CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 26Complex Systems and Time Series AnalysisStatistical Mechanics and EntropyFractal and DNA sequence analysis

Statistical Patterns in Written Language

Open access
Zanette, Damián H.·2014·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1412.3336arXiv 1412.3336
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Quantitative linguistics has been allowed, in the last few decades, within the admittedly blurry boundaries of the field of complex systems. A growing host of applied mathematicians and statistical physicists devote their efforts to disclose regularities, correlations, patterns, and structural properties of language streams, using techniques borrowed from statistics and information theory. Overall, results can still be categorized as modest, but the prospects are promising: medium- and long-range features in the organization of human language -which are beyond the scope of traditional linguistics- have already emerged from this kind of analysis and continue to be reported, contributing a new perspective to our understanding of this most complex communication system. This short book is intended to review some of these recent contributions.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1412.3336

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower frequency words remain an important component of natural language because they facilitate expressivity.

    “However, lower frequency words remain an important component of natural language because they facilitate expressivity156.”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [156]

  • In English, the most common 1,000 words can cover more than 85% of content in spoken sentences.

    “For example, in English, the most common 1,000 words can cover more than 85% of the content in spoken sentences156.”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [156]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Zanette, D. H.
Affiliations
Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (AR)
Corresponding author
Zanette, Damián H.
ORCID
Zanette, Damián H.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1412.3336
arXiv
1412.3336
OpenAlex
W9420056
Cited by
25
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
written language, long-range correlations, complex systems, quantitative linguistics, information theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review