CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proof of security of quantum key distribution with two-way classical communications

Gottesman, D., Hoi-Kwong Lo·2003·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
DOI 10.1109/tit.2002.807289
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tit.2002.807289

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two approaches exist to circumvent these issues: reducing the transmission loss using free-space communication and decoherence-free subspaces, or employing quantum repeaters.

    “Notwithstanding, two approaches exist to circumvent these issues: reducing the transmission loss using free-space communication [43,96,105,348,350,351,393-399] and decoherencefree subspaces [42,116,385,386,[388][389][390][391], or employing quantum repeaters.”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [394]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4238 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ben-Or, Presentation at, for example, Introductory Workshop in Quantum Computation
  4. 10.1145/335305.335406 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3018 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0375-9601(97)00176-X · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2022 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.1163 · DOI
  9. Gottesman, An introduction to quantum error correction, 10.1090/psapm/058/1922900 · DOI
  10. Gottesman, 2000, From quantum cheating to quantum security, 53, 22
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.022309 · DOI
  12. Grosshans, Reverse reconciliation protocols for quantum cryptography with continuous variables
  13. Holevo, 1973, Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel, Probl. Inform. Transm. (U.S.S.R.), 9, 177
  14. Inamori, Security of EPR-based quantum key distribution (Los Alamos e-print archive)
  15. Inamori, Security of EPR-based quantum key distribution using three bases (Los Alamos e-print archive)
  16. Inamori, Unconditional security of practical quantum key distribution. (Los Alamos e-print archive)
  17. 10.1126/science.1068972 · DOI
  18. Lo, 2001, Proof of unconditional security of six-state quantum key distribution scheme, 1, 81
  19. Lo, 1999, Unconditional security of quantum key distribution over arbitrarily long distances, 283, 2050
  20. Lo, 1998, Quantum cryptographic system with reduced data loss
  21. Lo, Efficient quantum key distribution scheme and proof of its unconditional security (Los Alamos e-print archive
  22. 10.1142/3724 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3301 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/3-540-48071-4_32 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/18.256484 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/18.748999 · DOI
  27. Mayers, Unconditional security in Quantum Cryptography, 48, 351
  28. Shor, 2000, Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol, 85, 441
  29. 10.1145/1008908.1008920 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1007/3-540-68697-5_26 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gottesman, D., & Lo, H.-K.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2003-02
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
457-475
ISSN
0018-9448
DOI
10.1109/tit.2002.807289
Cited by
283
References
6
Licence
ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review