Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 960

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sparse representations in unions of bases

Open access
Gribonval, R., Nielsen, M.·2003·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

The purpose of this correspondence is to generalize a result by Donoho and Huo and Elad and Bruckstein on sparse representations of signals in a union of two orthonormal bases for R/sup N/. We consider general (redundant) dictionaries for R/sup N/, and derive sufficient conditions for having unique sparse representations of signals in such dictionaries. The special case where the dictionary is given by the union of L/spl ges/2 orthonormal bases for R/sup N/ is studied in more detail. In particular, it is proved that the result of Donoho and Huo, concerning the replacement of the /spl lscr//sup 0/ optimization problem with a linear programming problem when searching for sparse representations, has an analog for dictionaries that may be highly redundant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tit.2003.820031

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gribonval, R., & Nielsen, M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
2003-12
Volume
49
Issue
12
Pages
3320-3325
ISSN
0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136235822
Cited by
960
References
0
FWCI
30.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.