The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cooperative Diversity in Wireless Networks: Efficient Protocols and Outage Behavior
Abstract
We develop and analyze low-complexity cooperative diversity protocols that combat fading induced by multipath propagation in wireless networks. The underlying techniques exploit space diversity available through cooperating terminals' relaying signals for one another. We outline several strategies employed by the cooperating radios, including fixed relaying schemes such as amplify-and-forward and decode-and-forward, selection relaying schemes that adapt based upon channel measurements between the cooperating terminals, and incremental relaying schemes that adapt based upon limited feedback from the destination terminal. We develop performance characterizations in terms of outage events and associated outage probabilities, which measure robustness of the transmissions to fading, focusing on the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime. Except for fixed decode-and-forward, all of our cooperative diversity protocols are efficient in the sense that they achieve full diversity (i.e., second-order diversity in the case of two terminals), and, moreover, are close to optimum (within 1.5 dB) in certain regimes. Thus, using distributed antennas, we can provide the powerful benefits of space diversity without need for physical arrays, though at a loss of spectral efficiency due to half-duplex operation and possibly at the cost of additional receive hardware. Applicable to any wireless setting, including cellular or ad hoc networks-wherever space constraints preclude the use of physical arrays-the performance characterizations reveal that large power or energy savings result from the use of these protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Andrews, J. G., Buzzi, S., Choi, W., Hanly, S. V., Lozano, A., Soong, A. C. K., & Zhang, J. C. (2014) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2014.2328098 · Cited by 8,106
Optical Communication in Space: Challenges and Mitigation Techniques
Kaushal, H., & Kaddoum, G. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2603518 · Cited by 1,927
Throughput Maximization for UAV-Enabled Mobile Relaying Systems
Zeng, Y., Zhang, R., & Lim, T. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2016.2611512 · Cited by 1,315
Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT): Recent Advances and Future Challenges
Ponnimbaduge Perera, T. D., Jayakody, D. N. K., Sharma, S. K., Chatzinotas, S., & Li, J. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2783901 · Cited by 920
Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio, Part II: Multiuser Networks
Ganesan, G., & Ye, L. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2007.05776 · Cited by 873
Metadata
- Authors
- Laneman, J. N., Tse, D. N. C., & Wornell, G. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3062-3080
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152121970
- Cited by
- 12,193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 450.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cooperative Diversity in Wireless Networks: Efficient Protocols and Outage Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2004.838089
- The paper
- Laneman, J. N., Tse, D. N. C., & Wornell, G. W. (2004). Cooperative Diversity in Wireless Networks: Efficient Protocols and Outage Behavior. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2004.838089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.