The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Simple Shrinkage Is Still Relevant for Redundant Representations?
Abstract
Shrinkage is a well known and appealing denoising technique, introduced originally by Donoho and Johnstone in 1994. The use of shrinkage for denoising is known to be optimal for Gaussian white noise, provided that the sparsity on the signal's representation is enforced using a unitary transform. Still, shrinkage is also practiced with nonunitary, and even redundant representations, typically leading to very satisfactory results. In this correspondence we shed some light on this behavior. The main argument in this work is that such simple shrinkage could be interpreted as the first iteration of an algorithm that solves the basis pursuit denoising (BPDN) problem. While the desired solution of BPDN is hard to obtain in general, we develop a simple iterative procedure for the BPDN minimization that amounts to stepwise shrinkage. We demonstrate how the simple shrinkage emerges as the first iteration of this novel algorithm. Furthermore, we show how shrinkage can be iterated, turning into an effective algorithm that minimizes the BPDN via simple shrinkage steps, in order to further strengthen the denoising effect
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wedgelets: nearly minimax estimation of edges
Donoho, D. L. (1999) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1018031261 · Cited by 638
Cited by
A New TwIST: Two-Step Iterative Shrinkage/Thresholding Algorithms for Image Restoration
Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Figueiredo, M. A. T. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.909319 · Cited by 2,064
Dictionaries for Sparse Representation Modeling
Rubinstein, R., Bruckstein, A. M., & Elad, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2010.2040551 · Cited by 1,306
Self-citationIterative Thresholding for Sparse Approximations
Blumensath, T., & Davies, M. E. (2008) · Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00041-008-9035-z · Cited by 1,248
Alternating Direction Algorithms for $\ell_1$-Problems in Compressive Sensing
Yang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2011) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/090777761 · Cited by 1,201
Fixed-Point Continuation for $\ell_1$-Minimization: Methodology and Convergence
Hale, E. T., Yin, W., & Zhang, Y. (2008) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/070698920 · Cited by 909
Metadata
- Authors
- Elad, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5559-5569
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148556090
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Simple Shrinkage Is Still Relevant for Redundant Representations? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2006.885522
- The paper
- Elad, M. (2006). Why Simple Shrinkage Is Still Relevant for Redundant Representations? IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2006.885522
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.