The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sharp Thresholds for High-Dimensional and Noisy Sparsity Recovery Using $\ell _{1}$-Constrained Quadratic Programming (Lasso)
Abstract
The problem of consistently estimating the sparsity pattern of a vector beta* isin Rpbased on observations contaminated by noise arises in various contexts, including signal denoising, sparse approximation, compressed sensing, and model selection. We analyze the behavior of l1-constrained quadratic programming (QP), also referred to as the Lasso, for recovering the sparsity pattern. Our main result is to establish precise conditions on the problem dimension p, the number k of nonzero elements in beta*, and the number of observations n that are necessary and sufficient for sparsity pattern recovery using the Lasso. We first analyze the case of observations made using deterministic design matrices and sub-Gaussian additive noise, and provide sufficient conditions for support recovery and linfin-error bounds, as well as results showing the necessity of incoherence and bounds on the minimum value. We then turn to the case of random designs, in which each row of the design is drawn from a N (0, Sigma) ensemble. For a broad class of Gaussian ensembles satisfying mutual incoherence conditions, we compute explicit values of thresholds 0l(Sigma) les thetasu(Sigma)0, if n > 2 (thetasu+ delta) klog (p- k), then the Lasso succeeds in recovering the sparsity pattern with probability converging to one for large problems, whereas for nl- delta)klog (p - k), then the probability of successful recovery converges to zero. For the special case of the uniform Gaussian ensemble (Sigma = Iptimesp), we show that thetasl= thetasu= 1, so that the precise threshold n = 2 klog(p- k) is exactly determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Cited by
An Interior-Point Method for Large-Scale -Regularized Least Squares
Kim, S.-J., Koh, K., Lustig, M., Boyd, S., & Gorinevsky, D. (2007) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2007.910971 · Cited by 2,083
High-dimensional Ising model selection using ℓ1-regularized logistic regression
Ravikumar, P., Wainwright, M. J., & Lafferty, J. D. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-aos691 · Cited by 892
Self-citationSparse Models and Methods for Optimal Instruments With an Application to Eminent Domain
(2012) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta9626 · Cited by 889
Optimization with Sparsity-Inducing Penalties
Bach, F. (2011) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601985118 · Cited by 608
A significance test for the lasso
Lockhart, R., Taylor, J., Tibshirani, R. J., & Tibshirani, R. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aos1175 · Cited by 541
Metadata
- Authors
- Wainwright, M. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2183-2202
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127300249
- Cited by
- 1,198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 63.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sharp Thresholds for High-Dimensional and Noisy Sparsity Recovery Using $\ell _{1}$-Constrained Quadratic Programming (Lasso). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2009.2016018
- The paper
- Wainwright, M. J. (2009). Sharp Thresholds for High-Dimensional and Noisy Sparsity Recovery Using $\ell _{1}$-Constrained Quadratic Programming (Lasso). IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2009.2016018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.