Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sharp Thresholds for High-Dimensional and Noisy Sparsity Recovery Using $\ell _{1}$-Constrained Quadratic Programming (Lasso)

Wainwright, Martin J.·2009·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

The problem of consistently estimating the sparsity pattern of a vector beta* isin Rpbased on observations contaminated by noise arises in various contexts, including signal denoising, sparse approximation, compressed sensing, and model selection. We analyze the behavior of l1-constrained quadratic programming (QP), also referred to as the Lasso, for recovering the sparsity pattern. Our main result is to establish precise conditions on the problem dimension p, the number k of nonzero elements in beta*, and the number of observations n that are necessary and sufficient for sparsity pattern recovery using the Lasso. We first analyze the case of observations made using deterministic design matrices and sub-Gaussian additive noise, and provide sufficient conditions for support recovery and linfin-error bounds, as well as results showing the necessity of incoherence and bounds on the minimum value. We then turn to the case of random designs, in which each row of the design is drawn from a N (0, Sigma) ensemble. For a broad class of Gaussian ensembles satisfying mutual incoherence conditions, we compute explicit values of thresholds 0l(Sigma) les thetasu(Sigma)0, if n > 2 (thetasu+ delta) klog (p- k), then the Lasso succeeds in recovering the sparsity pattern with probability converging to one for large problems, whereas for nl- delta)klog (p - k), then the probability of successful recovery converges to zero. For the special case of the uniform Gaussian ensemble (Sigma = Iptimesp), we show that thetasl= thetasu= 1, so that the precise threshold n = 2 klog(p- k) is exactly determined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tit.2009.2016018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,198

Metadata

Authors
Wainwright, M. J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
2009-05
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
2183-2202
ISSN
0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127300249
Cited by
1,198
References
1
FWCI
63.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sharp Thresholds for High-Dimensional and Noisy Sparsity Recovery Using $\ell _{1}$-Constrained Quadratic Programming (Lasso). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2009.2016018
The paper
Wainwright, M. J. (2009). Sharp Thresholds for High-Dimensional and Noisy Sparsity Recovery Using $\ell _{1}$-Constrained Quadratic Programming (Lasso). IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2009.2016018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.