The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information-Theoretic Regret Bounds for Gaussian Process Optimization in the Bandit Setting
Open accessAbstract
Many applications require optimizing an unknown, noisy function that is expensive to evaluate. We formalize this task as a multiarmed bandit problem, where the payoff function is either sampled from a Gaussian process (GP) or has low norm in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space. We resolve the important open problem of deriving regret bounds for this setting, which imply novel convergence rates for GP optimization. We analyze an intuitive Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) algorithm, and bound its cumulative regret in terms of maximal in- formation gain, establishing a novel connection between GP optimization and experimental design. Moreover, by bounding the latter in terms of operator spectra, we obtain explicit sublinear regret bounds for many commonly used covariance functions. In some important cases, our bounds have surprisingly weak dependence on the dimensionality. In our experiments on real sensor data, GP-UCB compares favorably with other heuristical GP optimization approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions
Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M., & Welch, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008306431147 · Cited by 8,070
Finite-time Analysis of the Multiarmed Bandit Problem
Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., & Fischer, P. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1013689704352 · Cited by 6,033
Spline Models for Observational Data
Wahba, G. (1990) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970128 · Cited by 4,184
Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments
Robbins, H. (1952) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1952-09620-8 · Cited by 2,184
Cited by
Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms
Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., & Adams, R. P. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1206.2944 · Cited by 6,691
(2011) · Cited by 3,939
Auto-WEKA: combined selection and hyperparameter optimization of classification algorithms
Thornton, C., Hutter, F., Hoos, H. H., & Leyton-Brown, K. (2013) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487629 · Cited by 1,359
Closed-loop optimization of fast-charging protocols for batteries with machine learning
Attia, P. M., Grover, A., Jin, N., Severson, K. A., Markov, T. M., Liao, Y.-H., Chen, M. H., Cheong, B., Perkins, N., Yang, Z., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1994-5 · Cited by 1,180
Predictive Entropy Search for Efficient Global Optimization of Black-box Functions
Hernández-Lobato, J. M., Hoffman, M. W., & Ghahramani, Z. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.2541 · Cited by 407
Metadata
- Authors
- Srinivas, N., Krause, A., Kakade, S. M., & Seeger, M. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3250-3265
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2951665052
- Cited by
- 1,850
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 72.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information-Theoretic Regret Bounds for Gaussian Process Optimization in the Bandit Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2011.2182033
- The paper
- Srinivas, N., Krause, A., Kakade, S. M., & Seeger, M. W. (2012). Information-Theoretic Regret Bounds for Gaussian Process Optimization in the Bandit Setting. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2011.2182033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.