The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Optimal Hard Threshold for Singular Values is \(4/\sqrt {3}\)
Open accessAbstract
We consider recovery of low-rank matrices from noisy data by hard thresholding of singular values, in which empirical singular values below a threshold λ are set to 0. We study the asymptotic mean squared error (AMSE) in a framework, where the matrix size is large compared with the rank of the matrix to be recovered, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the low-rank piece stays constant. The AMSE-optimal choice of hard threshold, in the case of n-by-n matrix in white noise of level σ, is simply (4/√3)√nσ ≈ 2.309√nσ when σ is known, or simply 2.858 · ymedwhen σ is unknown, where ymedis the median empirical singular value. For nonsquare, m by n matrices with m ≠ n the thresholding coefficients 4/√3 and 2.858 are replaced with different provided constants that depend on m/n. Asymptotically, this thresholding rule adapts to unknown rank and unknown noise level in an optimal manner: it is always better than hard thresholding at any other value, and is always better than ideal truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD), which truncates at the true rank of the low-rank matrix we are trying to recover. Hard thresholding at the recommended value to recover an n-by-n matrix of rank r guarantees an AMSE at most 3 nrσ2. In comparison, the guarantees provided by TSVD, optimally tuned singular value soft thresholding and the best guarantee achievable by any shrinkage of the data singular values are 5 nrσ2, 6 nrσ2, and 2 nrσ2, respectively. The recommended value for hard threshold also offers, among hard thresholds, the best possible AMSE guarantees for recovering matrices with bounded nuclear norm. Empirical evidence suggests that performance improvement over TSVD and other popular shrinkage rules can be substantial, for different noise distributions, even in relatively small n.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors
Cattell, R. B. (1966) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 · Cited by 13,554
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248
A Singular Value Thresholding Algorithm for Matrix Completion
Cai, J.-F., Candès, E. J., & Shen, Z. (2010) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/080738970 · Cited by 5,809
The Approximation of One Matrix by Another of Lower Rank
Eckart, C., & Young, G. (1936) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02288367 · Cited by 3,800
Cross-Validatory Estimation of the Number of Components in Factor and Principal Components Models
Wold, S. (1978) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1978.10489693 · Cited by 2,601
Jackson, D. A. (1993) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939574 · Cited by 2,298
Singular value decomposition for genome-wide expression data processing and modeling
Alter, O., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.18.10101 · Cited by 1,971
On the distribution of the largest eigenvalue in principal components analysis
Johnstone, I. M. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1009210544 · Cited by 1,949
Calculating the Singular Values and Pseudo-Inverse of a Matrix
Golub, G., & Kahan, W. (1965) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Series B Numerical Analysis · doi:10.1137/0702016 · Cited by 1,786
Spectral Analysis of Large Dimensional Random Matrices
Bai, Z., & Silverstein, J. W. (2010) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0661-8 · Cited by 1,544
Cited by
Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems
Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1517384113 · Cited by 4,796
Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations
Rudy, S. H., Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602614 · Cited by 1,557
Chaos as an intermittently forced linear system
Brunton, S. L., Brunton, B. W., Proctor, J. L., Kaiser, E., & Kutz, J. N. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00030-8 · Cited by 608
Mathematics for Machine Learning
Deisenroth, M. P., Faisal, A. A., & Ong, C. S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108679930 · Cited by 573
(2018) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2018.2810460 · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- Gavish, M., & Donoho, D. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5040-5053
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2963780177
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 24.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Optimal Hard Threshold for Singular Values is \(4/\sqrt {3}\). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2014.2323359
- The paper
- Gavish, M., & Donoho, D. L. (2014). The Optimal Hard Threshold for Singular Values is \(4/\sqrt {3}\). IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2014.2323359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.