The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance Evaluation of Sensing Fabrics for Monitoring Physiological and Biomechanical Variables
Abstract
In the last few years, the smart textile area has become increasingly widespread, leading to developments in new wearable sensing systems. Truly wearable instrumented garments capable of recording behavioral and vital signals are crucial for several fields of application. Here we report on results of a careful characterization of the performance of innovative fabric sensors and electrodes able to acquire vital biomechanical and physiological signals, respectively. The sensing function of the fabric sensors relies upon newly developed strain sensors, based on rubber-carbon-coated threads, and mainly depends on the weaving topology, and the composition and deposition process of the conducting rubber-carbon mixture. Fabric sensors are used to acquire the respitrace (RT) and movement sensors (MS). Sensing features of electrodes, instead rely upon metal-based conductive threads, which are instrumental in detecting bioelectrical signals, such as electrocardiogram (ECG) and electromyogram (EMG). Fabric sensors have been tested during some specific tasks of breathing and movement activity, and results have been compared with the responses of a commercial piezoelectric sensor and an electrogoniometer, respectively. The performance of fabric electrodes has been investigated and compared with standard clinical electrodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis
Pantelopoulos, A., & Bourbakis, N. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2009.2032660 · Cited by 2,296
A Wearable Health Care System Based on Knitted Integrated Sensors
Paradiso, R., Loriga, G., & Taccini, N. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2005.854512 · Cited by 729
Self-citationWireless Sensor Networks and Chemo-/Biosensing
Diamond, D., Coyle, S., Scarmagnani, S., & Hayes, J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0681187 · Cited by 265
A wearable yarn-based piezo-resistive sensor
Huang, C.-T., Shen, C.-L., Tang, C.-F., & Chang, S.-H. (2008) · Sensors and Actuators A: Physical · doi:10.1016/j.sna.2007.10.069 · Cited by 255
Validation of the Hexoskin wearable vest during lying, sitting, standing, and walking activities
Villar, R., Beltrame, T., & Hughson, R. L. (2015) · Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/apnm-2015-0140 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Scilingo, E. P., Gemignani, A., Paradiso, R., Taccini, N., Ghelarducci, B., & DeRossi, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-352
- ISSN
- 1089-7771 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077741723
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Evaluation of Sensing Fabrics for Monitoring Physiological and Biomechanical Variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/titb.2005.854506
- The paper
- Scilingo, E. P., Gemignani, A., Paradiso, R., Taccini, N., Ghelarducci, B., & DeRossi, D. (2005). Performance Evaluation of Sensing Fabrics for Monitoring Physiological and Biomechanical Variables. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1109/titb.2005.854506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.