Adaptive vehicle detector approach for complex environments
Abstract
In this paper, a vehicle detection approach for complex environments is presented. This paper proposes methods for solving problems of vehicle detection in traffic jams and complex weather conditions such as sunny days, rainy days, cloudy days, sunrise time, sunset time, or nighttime. In recent research, there have been many well-known vehicle detectors that utilize background extraction methods to recognize vehicles. In these studies, the background image needs to continuously be updated; otherwise, the luminance variation will impact the detection quality. The vehicle detection under various environments will have many difficulties such as illumination vibrations, shadow effects, and vehicle overlapping problems that appear in traffic jams. The main contribution of this paper is to propose an adaptive vehicle detection approach in complex environments to directly detect vehicles without extracting and updating a reference background image in complex environments. In the proposed approach, histogram extension addresses the removal of the effects of weather and light impact. The gray-level differential value method is utilized to directly extract moving objects from the images. Finally, tracking and error compensation are applied to refine the target tracking quality. In addition, many useful traffic parameters are evaluated. These useful traffic parameters, including traffic flows, velocity, and vehicle classifications, can help to control traffic and provide drivers with good guidance. Experimental results show that the proposed methods are robust, accurate, and powerful enough to overcome complex weather conditions and traffic jams.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wu and Juang's vehicle detection system using histogram extension and GDVM has reduced accuracy in rainy and dark conditions.
“However, the system's reduced accuracy in rainy and dark conditions suggests a limitation of traditional approaches when dealing with significant environmental variations.”
From Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicles under Adverse Weather: A Review of Traditional and Deep Learning Approaches (2024) · cites this paper as [108]
Cites
Lane Detection With Moving Vehicles in the Traffic Scenes
Cheng, H.-Y., Jeng, B.-S., Tseng, P.-T., & Fan, K.-C. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2006.883940 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edge Video Analytics for Public Safety: A Review
Zhang, Q., Sun, H., Wu, X., & Zhong, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2925910 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Tahir, N. U. A., Zhang, Z., Asim, M., Chen, J., & ELAffendi, M. (2024) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a17030103 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Analyzing Performance of YOLOx for Detecting Vehicles in Bad Weather Conditions
Ashraf, I., Hur, S., Kim, G., & Park, Y. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24020522 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Vehicles detection system at different weather conditions
Abdullah, M. N., & Ali, Y. H. (2021) · Iraqi Journal of Science · doi:10.24996/ijs.2021.62.6.30 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wu, B.-F., & Juang, J.-H.
- Affiliations
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- ORCID
- Wu, Bing-Fei
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 817-827
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W2157616852
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Keywords
- vehicle detection, traffic congestion, complex weather conditions, moving object extraction, vehicle tracking, error compensation, traffic flow estimation, vehicle speed estimation, vehicle classification, intelligent transportation systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review