Cited by 11Traffic control and managementTransportation and Mobility InnovationsRoad Transport and Highway Systems

Optimizing Departures of Automated Vehicles From Highways While Maintaining Mainline Capacity

Meissner, Eric, Chantem, Thidapat, Heaslip, Kevin·2016·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Automated vehicles have the potential to revolutionize our nation's transportation systems as they promise to dramatically reduce congestion, accidents, and fuel usage. Namely, as it becomes possible to precisely exert control on and coordinate the movement and placement of vehicles along a stretch of highway, the separation distance between vehicles can be reduced, thus increasing flow and minimizing congestion. Precise and coordinated vehicle controls and placements also improve predictability, resulting in fewer instances of sudden braking, which reduce fuel usage and accidents. Most existing research has focused on the steady-state behaviors and operations of automated vehicles, such as platooning, and assumes complete knowledge of the system, e.g., the number of vehicles and their destinations and/or neglects dynamic or transition operations such as exiting a highway and lane changing. Uncoordinated lane-changing and exiting behaviors by automated vehicles can significantly reduce the flow of traffic as vehicles will require larger separations, are forced to slow down, or worse, collide. In this paper, we present a collision-free runtime approach to efficiently organize the departures of automated vehicles from a highway environment while maintaining highway capacity in extremely dynamic conditions. To maximize the number of safe departures, the key ideas are to: 1) determine when, and where to, an exiting vehicle should lane change in order to make a successful exit given current traffic conditions as provided by connected vehicle technology and 2) execute the actual lane-change operations using a reservation-based approach. Simulation results show that, by coordinating vehicles' behaviors, traffic flow can be improved by up to five times of today's typical flow while ensuring a 100% exit success rate in a collision-free manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2016.2561203

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625197 · DOI
  2. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:2(182) · DOI
  3. 10.1109/LCN.2008.4664253 · DOI
  4. 10.1287/trsc.29.2.118 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/RAMECH.2004.1438017 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TITS.2007.908721 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.006 · DOI
  8. berry, 2010, The Effects of Driving Style and Vehicle Performance on the Realworld Fuel Consumption of US Light-duty Vehicles
  9. 10.1109/ITSC.2012.6338779 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.comcom.2007.12.008 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.trb.2005.04.003 · DOI
  12. board, 2010, Highway Capacity Manual
  13. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000165 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TITS.2008.928265 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/095965180121500402 · DOI
  16. 10.1088/0305-4470/33/48/103 · DOI
  17. greenshields, 0, A study of traffic capacity, Highw Res Board Proc Annu Meet, 448
  18. 10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00011-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0005-1098(97)00050-2 · DOI
  20. chee, 1994, Vehicle lane change maneuver in automated highway systems
  21. 10.1109/TITS.2003.811644 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TITS.2014.2356932 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1007/s12239-008-0043-4 · DOI
  25. tsao, 1994, Capacity of automated highway systems Effect of platooning and barriers
  26. 10.1142/S0219843611002319 · DOI
  27. subramanian, 2005, Motor vehicle traffic crashes as a leading cause of death in the U S 2002—A demographic perspective
  28. 10.1016/j.trc.2004.09.001 · DOI
  29. horowitz, 2004, An efficient lane change maneuver for platoons of vehicles in an automated highway system
  30. 10.1257/aer.101.6.2616 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.014 · DOI
  32. schrank, 2012, TTI's 2012 Urban Mobility Report
  33. 10.1109/87.852914 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/ACC.1995.533804 · DOI
  35. moriarty, 1998, Distributed learning of lane-selection strategies for traffic management
  36. 10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00012-5 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/25.618201 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/IVS.2007.4290284 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00006-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meissner, E., Chantem, T., & Heaslip, K.
Affiliations
  • Utah State University (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2016-12
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
3498-3511
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W2413042152
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1545091, 1544601)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Road Transport and Highway Systems
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, lane changing, road capacity, traffic flow, connected vehicles, traffic congestion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review