Cited by 206Vehicle License Plate RecognitionAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques

Segmentation- and Annotation-Free License Plate Recognition With Deep Localization and Failure Identification

Bulan, Orhan, Kozitsky, Vladimir, Ramesh, Palghat, Shreve, Matthew·2017·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Automated license plate recognition (ALPR) is essential in several roadway imaging applications. For ALPR systems deployed in the United States, variation between jurisdictions on character width, spacing, and the existence of noise sources (e.g., heavy shadows, non-uniform illumination, various optical geometries, poor contrast, and so on) present in LP images makes it challenging for the recognition accuracy and scalability of ALPR systems. Font and plate-layout variation across jurisdictions further adds to the difficulty of proper character segmentation and increases the level of manual annotation required for training classifiers for each state, which can result in excessive operational overhead and cost. In this paper, we propose a new ALPR workflow that includes novel methods for segmentation- and annotation-free ALPR, as well as improved plate localization and automation for failure identification. Our proposed workflow begins with localizing the LP region in the captured image using a two-stage approach that first extracts a set of candidate regions using a weak sparse network of winnows classifier and then filters them using a strong convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier in the second stage. Images that fail a primary confidence test for plate localization are further classified to identify localization failures, such as LP not present, LP too bright, LP too dark, or no vehicle found. In the localized plate region, we perform segmentation and optical character recognition (OCR) jointly by using a probabilistic inference method based on hidden Markov models (HMMs) where the most likely code sequence is determined by applying the Viterbi algorithm. In order to reduce manual annotation required for training classifiers for OCR, we propose the use of either artificially generated synthetic LP images or character samples acquired by trained ALPR systems already operating in other sites. The performance gap due to differences between training and target domain distributions is minimized using an unsupervised domain adaptation. We evaluated the performance of our proposed methods on LP images captured in several US jurisdictions under realistic conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2016.2639020

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bulan, O., Kozitsky, V., Ramesh, P., & Shreve, M.
Affiliations
  • General Motors (United States) (US)
  • PARC, Webster, NY, USA
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2017-09
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
2351-2363
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W2575354312
Cited by
206
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 4
FWCI
23.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Vehicle License Plate Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Keywords
license plate recognition, plate localization, segmentation-free recognition, annotation-free training, failure identification, optical character recognition, hidden Markov models, Viterbi decoding, synthetic image generation, unsupervised domain adaptation, convolutional neural networks, jurisdictional variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review