Predictive Energy Management Strategy for Fully Electric Vehicles Based on Preceding Vehicle Movement
Abstract
This paper presents an energy-efficient and terrain-information-and-preceding-vehicle-information-incorporated energy management strategy for fully electric vehicles (FEVs) equipped with in-wheel motors. Saving driving energy with terrain preview and preceding vehicle movement prediction are crucial to prolong the driving distance for an FEV. Unlike conducting energy optimization under the assumption that the preceding vehicle movements are already known in most studies, the front vehicle movements are predicted during each control cycle based on the vehicle-to-vehicle communication, and the FEV vehicle velocity and motor torque distribution are optimized by a nonlinear model predictive controller to reduce energy consumption. The energy-saving objective is achieved by including, in the cost function, the motor energy consumption in each control cycle, while the safety objective is accomplished by keeping a suitable relative distance from the preceding vehicle. Since the nonlinear vehicle longitudinal model is applied, the gridding initial torque plane is utilized in each time step to search for the global minimum. Simulation results show that this method has a better energy-saving performance than the control method without using the preceding vehicle movement information, and the algorithm proposed here has a wide applicability under various driving conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Zhang et al.'s simulations, EV velocity and motor torque distribution are optimized by a nonlinear predictive controller model to reduce energy consumption.
“In their simulations, EV velocity and motor torque distribution are optimized by a nonlinear predictive controller model to reduce energy consumption.”
From A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [89]
Zhang et al. simulate how to extend driving ranges by predicting terrain changes and preceding vehicle movement.
“Particularly, the authors simulate how to extend driving ranges, by predicting both terrain changes and preceding vehicle's movement.”
From A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [89]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Luo, Y., Wang, J., Wang, X., & Li, K.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3049-3060
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W2596696538
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFB0100905)
- State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (U1564208)
- China Scholarship Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Keywords
- energy management strategy, fully electric vehicles, in-wheel motor, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, nonlinear model predictive control, energy consumption reduction, longitudinal vehicle dynamics, driving range extension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review