Cited by 185Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisTransportation Planning and OptimizationTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques

A Generative Model of Urban Activities from Cellular Data

Yin, Mogeng, Sheehan, Madeleine, Feygin, Sidney, Paiement, Jean-Francois, Pozdnoukhov, Alexei·2018·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Activity-based travel demand models are becoming essential tools used in transportation planning and regional development scenario evaluation. They describe travel itineraries of individual travelers, namely, what activities they are participating in, when they perform these activities, and how they choose to travel to the activity locales. However, data collection for activity-based models is performed through travel surveys that are infrequent, expensive, and reflect the changes in transportation with significant delays. Thanks to the ubiquitous cell phone data, we see an opportunity to substantially complement these surveys with data extracted from network carrier mobile phone usage logs, such as call detail records (CDRs). In this paper, we develop input-output hidden Markov models to infer travelers' activity patterns from CDRs. We apply the model to the data collected by a major network carrier serving millions of users in the San Francisco Bay Area. Our approach delivers an end-to-end actionable solution to the practitioners in the form of a modular and interpretable activity-based travel demand model. It is experimentally validated with three independent data sources: aggregated statistics from travel surveys, a set of collected ground truth activities, and the results of a traffic micro-simulation informed with the travel plans synthesized from the developed generative model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2017.2695438

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML can provide information about mobility patterns necessary for agent-based travel demand models.

    “ML can provide information about mobility patterns, which is directly necessary for agent-based travel demand models, one of the main transport planning tools [864].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [864]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, M., Sheehan, M., Feygin, S., Paiement, J.-F., & Pozdnoukhov, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2018-06
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1682-1696
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W2617955281
Cited by
185
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12
FWCI
28.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
  • UC Berkeley (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • AT and T
  • State of California Department of Transportation through the UCCONNECT Faculty Research Grant Program (65A0529)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Keywords
activity-based travel demand modeling, call detail records, cellular data, hidden Markov models, input-output hidden Markov model, urban activity patterns, generative models, travel surveys, microscopic traffic simulation, San Francisco Bay Area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review