Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensors and AI Techniques for Situational Awareness in Autonomous Ships: A Review

Open access
Thombre, Sarang, Zhao, Zheng, Ramm-Schmidt, Henrik, Vallet Garcia, Jose M., Malkamaki, Tuomo, Nikolskiy, Sergey, Hammarberg, Toni, Nuortie, Hiski, H. Bhuiyan, M. Zahidul, Sarkka, Simo, Lehtola, Ville V.·2022·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Autonomous ships are expected to improve the level of safety and efficiency in future maritime navigation. Such vessels need perception for two purposes: to perform autonomous situational awareness and to monitor the integrity of the sensor system itself. In order to meet these needs, the perception system must fuse data from novel and traditional perception sensors using Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques. This article overviews the recognized operational requirements that are imposed on regular and autonomous seafaring vessels, and then proceeds to consider suitable sensors and relevant AI techniques for an operational sensor system. The integration of four sensors families is considered: sensors for precise absolute positioning (Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)), visual sensors (monocular and stereo cameras), audio sensors (microphones), and sensors for remote-sensing (RADAR and LiDAR). Additionally, sources of auxiliary data, such as Automatic Identification System (AIS) and external data archives are discussed. The perception tasks are related to well-defined problems, such as situational abnormality detection, vessel classification, and localization, that are solvable using AI techniques. Machine learning methods, such as deep learning and Gaussian processes, are identified to be especially relevant for these problems. The different sensors and AI techniques are characterized keeping in view the operational requirements, and some example state-of-the-art options are compared based on accuracy, complexity, required resources, compatibility and adaptability to maritime environment, and especially towards practical realization of autonomous systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2020.3023957

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Thombre, S., Zhao, Z., Ramm-Schmidt, H., Vallet Garcia, J. M., Malkamaki, T., Nikolskiy, S., Hammarberg, T., Nuortie, H., H. Bhuiyan, M. Z., Sarkka, S., & Lehtola, V. V.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2022-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
64-83
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W3089916726
Cited by
283
References
78
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensors and AI Techniques for Situational Awareness in Autonomous Ships: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2020.3023957
The paper
Thombre, S., Zhao, Z., Ramm-Schmidt, H., Vallet Garcia, J. M., Malkamaki, T., Nikolskiy, S., Hammarberg, T., Nuortie, H., H. Bhuiyan, M. Z., Sarkka, S., & Lehtola, V. V. (2022). Sensors and AI Techniques for Situational Awareness in Autonomous Ships: A Review. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2020.3023957

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.