Decentralized Quality of Service Based System for Energy Trading Among Electric Vehicles
Abstract
This paper incorporates a new perspective into P2P energy trading coordination schemes for EVs by considering Quality of Service (QoS) management. QoS could be utilized as a control metric to facilitate resilient and reliable transactions according to user preferences. To that end, this paper proposes a novel decentralized QoS-based system for P2P energy trading among EV energy providers and consumers. The system utilizes smart contracts to carry out the matching between EVs and monitor the delivery of a QoS-based P2P contract without the presence of a third party. Two QoS-based mechanisms are proposed to match trading EVs in this system. The proposed mechanisms are designed to match single-consumer to multiple-providers and multiple-consumers to multiple-providers based on consumers’ and providers’ QoS requirements and offers, respectively. A fuzzy-based approach with minimum and intelligible input is introduced to determine the weight values of each QoS attribute. Further, a penalty mechanism is developed to discourage dishonest requests/offers and ensure that trading parties stick to their contractual obligations. Numerical simulations are conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed QoS-based mechanisms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies in Refs [11 -17,19 -22] do not introduce a proper flexibility quantification method to effectively exploit the flexibility of EVs.
“Furthermore, the studies in Refs. [11 -17,19 -22] do not introduce a proper flexibility quantification method to effectively exploit the flexibility of EVs”
From Improving distribution system flexibility using electric vehicles under the distributed energy resource management system framework (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Most mentioned studies overlook the potential benefits of an integrated DER environment, such as DERMS, where EVs could operate in coordination with other DERs to enhance overall grid stability and flexibility.
“Second, most studies overlook the potential benefits of an integrated DER environment, such as DERMS, where EVs could operate in coordination with other DERs to enhance overall grid stability and flexibility.”
From Improving distribution system flexibility using electric vehicles under the distributed energy resource management system framework (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, S., & Jung, J. (2026) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.116292 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Al-Obaidi, A. A., & Farag, H. E. Z.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 6586-6595
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W3132586917
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- York University Research Chairs Program
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Keywords
- peer-to-peer energy trading, electric vehicles, quality of service, decentralized systems, smart contracts, fuzzy logic, punishment mechanism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
