Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning Model for Decentralized VANETs Using Fully Homomorphic Encryption and Blockchain
Abstract
In Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs), privacy protection and data security during network transmission and data analysis have attracted attention. In this paper, we apply deep learning, blockchain, and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) technologies in VANETs and propose a Decentralized Privacy-preserving Deep Learning (DPDL) model. We propose a Decentralized VANETs (DVANETs) architecture, where computing tasks are decomposed from centralized cloud services to edge computing (EC) nodes, thereby effectively reducing network communication overhead and congestion delay. We use blockchain to establish a secure and trusted data communication mechanism among vehicles, roadside units, and EC nodes. In addition, we propose a DPDL model to provide privacy-preserving data analysis for DVANET, where the FHE algorithm is used to encrypt the transportation data on each EC node and input it into the local DPDL models, thereby effectively protecting the privacy and credibility of vehicles. Moreover, we further use blockchain to provide a decentralized and trusted DPDL model update mechanism, where the parameters of each local DPDL model are stored in the blockchain for sharing with other distributed models. In this way, all distributed models can update their models in a credible and asynchronous manner, avoiding possible threats and attacks. Extensive simulations are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness, practicality, and robustness of the proposed DVANET system and DPDL models.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
[19] used blockchain, ECC, and FHE for secure, reliable model updates and privacy-preserving data transmission.
“In [19], blockchain, elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC), and FHE were used for secure, reliable model updates and privacy-preserving data transmission.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
It ensured data privacy and mitigated threats like model extraction.
“It ensured data privacy and mitigated threats like model extraction.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
In [19], a decentralized privacy-preserving DL (DPDL) model for VANETs integrated FHE and blockchain to enable secure data exchanges among vehicles and edge nodes.
“In [19], a decentralized privacy-preserving DL (DPDL) model for VANETs integrated FHE and blockchain to enable secure data exchanges among vehicles and edge nodes.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
Cites
DeepChain: Auditable and Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning with Blockchain-based Incentive
Weng, J., Weng, J., Zhang, J., Li, M., Zhang, Y., & Luo, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2019.2952332 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Towards Fair and Privacy-Preserving Federated Deep Models
Lyu, L., Yu, J., Nandakumar, K., Li, Y., Ma, X., Jin, J., Yu, H., & Ng, K. S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2020.2996273 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain-Based Personalized Federated Learning for Internet of Medical Things
Lian, Z., Wang, W., Han, Z., & Su, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing · doi:10.1109/tsusc.2023.3279111 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Kalidoss, L., Thouti, S., Arunachalam, R., & Ramamurthy, P. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125275 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Jiang, W., Tao, J., & Guan, Z. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3492031 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Lakhan, A., Groenli, T.-M., Wu, H., Younas, M., & Ghinea, G. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2024.3493452 · Cited by 8
Islam, N., & Zulkernine, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01089 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Additionally, managing cumulative privacy loss over multiple queries or iterations (the privacy budget) is crucial to maintaining robust privacy guarantees over time.”
- Authors
- Chen, J., Li, K., & Yu, P. S.
- Affiliations
- Hunan University (CN)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 11633-11642
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W3196878063
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB2104000)
- Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2020JJ5084)
- International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program (20180024)
- National Science Foundation (III-1763325, III-1909323, III-2106758, SaTC-1930941)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- vehicular ad hoc networks, privacy-preserving deep learning, fully homomorphic encryption, blockchain, edge computing, vehicle data privacy, roadside units, communication cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review