Cited by 22Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

An efficient model of enhanced optimization and dilated-GRU based secured multi-access edge computing with blockchain for VANET sector

Kalidoss, Lavanya, Thouti, Swapna, Arunachalam, Rajesh, Ramamurthy, Pugalenthi·2025·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125275

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalidoss, L., Thouti, S., Arunachalam, R., & Ramamurthy, P.
Affiliations
  • Velammal Educational Trust (IN)
  • Saveetha University (IN)
  • St. Joseph’s College of Engineering (IN)
Corresponding author
Thouti, Swapna
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
260
Pages
125275
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402129155
Cited by
22
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
vehicular ad hoc networks, VANET security, blockchain, mobile edge computing, node authentication, Osprey optimization algorithm, hyperparameter optimization, consensus algorithms, data privacy, quality of service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review