Cited by 27Traffic control and managementTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesReinforcement Learning in Robotics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning Multi-Intersection Traffic Signal Control via Coevolutionary Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Chen, Wubing, Yang, Shangdong, Li, Wenbin, Hu, Yujing, Liu, Xiao, Gao, Yang·2024·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Effective management of multi-intersection traffic signal control (MTSC) is vital for intelligent transportation systems. Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has shown promise in achieving MTSC. However, existing MARL-based MTSC algorithms have primarily focused on capturing the spatial relationship between multi-intersection traffic signals but have overlooking the importance of the temporally stable traffic pattern. This pattern refers to the fixed positions and relatively stable traffic flow between intersections over short periods in real-world MTSC scenarios, which indicates that the learned spatial relationships between traffic signals should co-evolve over time. To this end, we propose a novel algorithm calledCoevolutionaryMulti-AgentReinforcementLearning (CoevoMARL). CoevoMARL employs a graph neural network to capture the complex spatial interaction network among traffic signals. Furthermore, we propose a relationship-driven progressive LSTM (RDP-LSTM) that dynamically evolves the learned spatial interaction network over time by leveraging insights from the temporally stable traffic pattern. To accelerate convergence, we also propose the mutual information reward optimization (MIRO) technique, which strengthens the correlation between policy learning and high-performance samples by using a mutual information-based intrinsic reward. Experimental results on both synthetic and realistic datasets demonstrate the superiority of CoevoMARL over existing MTSC algorithms, providing valuable insights into incorporating the temporally stable traffic pattern.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2024.3410023

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Pishue, 2023, 2022 Global Traffic Scorecard
  2. 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3146811 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/tnnls.2023.3264709 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3230701 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/3447556.3447565 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TITS.2018.2815520 · DOI
  7. 10.1057/jors.1963.61 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/978-1-4614-6243-9_2 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/ITSC.2012.6338817 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TCNS.2014.2378871 · DOI
  11. 10.11591/ijai.v11.i3.pp809-818 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/IVS.1992.252240 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00026-1 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2276571 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TITS.2020.3008612 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/3219819.3220096 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/TITS.2021.3107258 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TITS.2021.3131596 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TITS.2021.3091014 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TITS.2022.3216203 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TITS.2022.3229477 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TITS.2021.3105426 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TITS.2021.3115240 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/TKDE.2022.3232711 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3146201 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3146858 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3094901 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.913919 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3197918 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TNN.2008.2005605 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Battaglia, Interaction networks for learning about objects, relations and physics, 4502
  32. Hunt, 1982, The scoot online traffic signal optimisation technique, Traffic Eng., Control, 23, 190
  33. Lowrie, 1992, Scats: A Traffic Responsive Method of Controlling Urban Traffic Control
  34. 10.1007/978-1-4471-5113-5_3 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0968-090X(00)00047-4 · DOI
  36. Robertson, Transyt: Traffic network study tool, 22
  37. 10.1145/3357384.3357902 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/TMC.2020.3033782 · DOI
  39. Van der Pol, Coordinated deep reinforcement learners for traffic light control, 1
  40. 10.1007/978-3-540-87479-9_61 · DOI
  41. 10.1109/TITS.2010.2091408 · DOI
  42. 10.1109/TITS.2013.2255286 · DOI
  43. Wiering, Multi-agent reinforcement learning for traffic light control, 2065
  44. 10.1145/3292500.3330949 · DOI
  45. 10.1145/3357384.3357900 · DOI
  46. 10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5744 · DOI
  47. 10.1609/aaai.v35i1.16147 · DOI
  48. 10.1145/1082473.1082545 · DOI
  49. 10.1049/iet-its.2009.0070 · DOI
  50. 10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569301 · DOI
  51. 10.3390/s20010137 · DOI
  52. Zhang, Expression might be enough: Representing pressure and demand for reinforcement learning based traffic signal control, 26645
  53. Wu, 2021, Efficient pressure: Improving efficiency for signalized intersections, arXiv:2112.02336 · arXiv
  54. 10.1145/3564754 · DOI
  55. 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3087228 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/B978-1-55860-335-6.50027-1 · DOI
  57. Nam, Reinforcement learning with state observation costs in action-contingent noiselessly observable Markov decision processes, 15650
  58. 10.1145/3308558.3314139 · DOI
  59. Velickovic, 2018, Graph attention networks, arXiv:1710.10903 · arXiv
  60. Battaglia, 2018, Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks, arXiv:1806.01261 · arXiv
  61. Setoodeh, 2022, Deep learning, 113
  62. Bai, 2018, An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling, arXiv:1803.01271 · arXiv
  63. 10.1109/TITS.2022.3155749 · DOI
  64. 10.48550/ARXIV.1706.03762 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1109/TMM.2020.2965434 · DOI
  66. 10.1109/TMM.2018.2862341 · DOI
  67. Sutton, 2018, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
  68. Belghazi, Mutual information neural estimation, 531
  69. Yi, 2021, Learning to share in multi-agent reinforcement learning, arXiv:2112.08702 · arXiv
  70. Xu, 2022, Roadnetsz
  71. Oroojlooy, AttendLight: Universal attention-based reinforcement learning model for traffic signal control, 4509
  72. Mnih, 2013, Playing Atari with deep reinforcement learning, arXiv:1312.5602 · arXiv
  73. 10.1109/IJCNN.2010.5596468 · DOI
  74. Dong, 2024, WToE: Learning when to explore in multiagent reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 1, 10.1109/TCYB.2024.3403729 · DOI
  75. Schwarzer, Data-efficient reinforcement learning with self-predictive representations
  76. Tang, Understanding self-predictive learning for reinforcement learning, 33632
  77. Chen, Learning explicit credit assignment for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning via polarization policy gradient, 9
  78. Brockman, 2016, OpenAI gym, arXiv:1606.01540 · arXiv
  79. 10.21236/ADA276517 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chen, W., Yang, S., Li, W., Hu, Y., Liu, X., & Gao, Y.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Netease Fuxi AI Laboratory, Netease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2024-11
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
15947-15963
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W4399618329
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 9
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62192783, 62106100, 62206133)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu (BK20221441)
  • Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by the China Association for Science and Technology (2023QNRC001)
  • State Key Laboratory of Novel Software Technology Project (KFKT2022B12)
  • Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
multi-agent reinforcement learning, graph neural networks, spatial interaction networks, intrinsic rewards, intelligent transportation systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review