Probabilistic Charging Power Forecast of EVCS: Reinforcement Learning Assisted Deep Learning Approach
Open accessAbstract
The electric vehicle (EV) and electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) have been widely deployed with the development of large-scale transportation electrifications. However, since charging behaviors of EVs show large uncertainties, the forecasting of EVCS charging power is non-trivial. This paper tackles this issue by proposing a reinforcement learning assisted deep learning framework for the probabilistic EVCS charging power forecasting to capture its uncertainties. Since the EVCS charging power data are not standard time-series data like electricity load, they are first converted to the time-series format. On this basis, one of the most popular deep learning models, the long short-term memory (LSTM) is used and trained to obtain the point forecast of EVCS charging power. To further capture the forecast uncertainty, a Markov decision process (MDP) is employed to model the change of LSTM cell states, which is solved by our proposed adaptive exploration proximal policy optimization (AePPO) algorithm based on reinforcement learning. Finally, experiments are carried out on the real EVCSs charging data from Caltech, and Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA, respectively. The results and comparative analysis verify the effectiveness and outperformance of our proposed framework.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Introducing a mandatory requirement for EVCS reactive power control will require the use of an active front end in fast EVCSs, which may lead to an increase in their cost.
“In addition, the introduction of this requirement will require the use of an active front end in fast EVCSs, which may lead to an increase in their cost [49,50].”
From Determining Volt/Var Characteristics of Electric Vehicle Charging Station Inverters for Voltage Regulation in Distribution Networks (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
The Introduction (p. 1) discusses uncertainty in EVCS charging power and the need to forecast it, not requirements for reactive power control. Searches for active front ends, reactive power control, and converter costs found no passage addressing whether such a requirement would increase fast-EVCS costs. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- [1][1] Z. Wei, Y. Li, and L. Cai, 'Electric vehicle charging scheme for a park-and-charge system considering battery degradation costs,' IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles , vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 361-373, 2018. -
- [2][2] L. Liu, F. Kong, X. Liu, Y. Peng, and Q. Wang, 'A review on electric vehicles interacting with renewable energy in smart grid,' Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , vol. 51, pp. 648-661, 2015. -
- [3][3] Y. Shi, H. D. Tuan, A. V. Savkin, T. Q. Duong, and H. V. Poor, 'Model predictive control for smart grids with multiple electric-vehicle charging stations,' IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 21272136, 2019. -
- [4][4] K. Chaudhari, N. K. Kandasamy, A. Krishnan, A. Ukil, and H. B. Gooi, 'Agent-based aggregated behavior modeling for electric vehicle charging load,' IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 856-868, 2019. -
- [5][5] S. Cheng, Z. Wei, D. Shang, Z. Zhao, and H. Chen, 'Charging load prediction and distribution network reliability evaluation considering electric vehicles' spatial-temporal transfer randomness,' IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 124 084-124 096, 2020. -
- [6][6] L. Chen, F. Yang, Q. Xing, S. Wu, R. Wang, and J. Chen, 'Spatialtemporal distribution prediction of charging load for electric vehicles based on dynamic traffic information,' in 2020 IEEE 4th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration , 2020, pp. 1269-1274. -
- [7][7] Y. Zheng, Z. Shao, Y. Zhang, and L. Jian, 'A systematic methodology for mid-and-long term electric vehicle charging load forecasting: The case study of Shenzhen, China,' Sustainable Cities and Society , vol. 56, p. 102084, 2020. -
- [8][8] H. J. Feng, L. C. Xi, Y. Z. Jun, Y. X. Ling, and H. Jun, 'Review of electric vehicle charging demand forecasting based on multi-source data,' in 2020 IEEE Sustainable Power and Energy Conference , 2020, pp. 139-146. -
- [9][9] H. M. Louie, 'Time-series modeling of aggregated electric vehicle charging station load,' Electric Power Components and Systems , vol. 45, no. 14, pp. 1498-1511, 2017. -
- [10][10] X. Zhang, 'Short-term load forecasting for electric bus charging stations based on fuzzy clustering and least squares support vector machine optimized by wolf pack algorithm,' Energies , vol. 11, no. 6, p. 1449, 2018. -
- [11][11] A. Almaghrebi, F. Aljuheshi, M. Rafaie, K. James, and M. Alahmad, 'Data-driven charging demand prediction at public charging stations using supervised machine learning regression methods,' Energies , vol. 13, no. 16, p. 4231, 2020. -
- [12][12] J. Zhu, Z. Yang, M. Mourshed, Y. Guo, Y. Zhou, Y. Chang, Y. Wei, and S. Feng, 'Electric vehicle charging load forecasting: A comparative study of deep learning approaches,' Energies , vol. 12, no. 14, p. 2692, 2019. -
- [13][13] Z. Li, Y. Li, Y. Liu, P. Wang, R. Lu, and H. B. Gooi, 'Deep learning based densely connected network for load forecasting,' IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 2829-2840, 2021. -
- [14][14] G. Guo, W. Yuan, Y. Lv, W. Liu, and J. Liu, 'Traffic forecasting via dilated temporal convolution with peak-sensitive loss,' IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine , in press. -
- [15][15] M. Xue, L. Wu, Q. P. Zhang, J. X. Lu, X. Mao, and Y. Pan, 'Research on load forecasting of charging station based on XGBoost and LSTM model,' in Journal of Physics: Conference Series , vol. 1757, no. 1, 2021, p. 012145. -
- [16][16] Y. Kim and S. Kim, 'Forecasting charging demand of electric vehicles using time-series models,' Energies , vol. 14, no. 5, p. 1487, 2021. -
- [17][17] L. Buzna, P. De Falco, G. Ferruzzi, S. Khormali, D. Proto, N. Refa, M. Straka, and G. van der Poel, 'An ensemble methodology for hierarchical probabilistic electric vehicle load forecasting at regular charging stations,' Applied Energy , vol. 283, p. 116337, 2021. -
- [18][18] X. Zhang, K. W. Chan, H. Li, H. Wang, J. Qiu, and G. Wang, 'Deeplearning-based probabilistic forecasting of electric vehicle charging load with a novel queuing model,' IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics , vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 3157-3170, 2021. -
- [19][19] L. Zhu and N. Laptev, 'Deep and confident prediction for time series at uber,' 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops , pp. 103-110, 2017. -
- [20][20] Y. Li, G. Hao, Y. Liu, Y. Yu, Z. Ni, and Y. Zhao, 'Many-objective distribution network reconfiguration via deep reinforcement learning assisted optimization algorithm,' IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery , in press. -
- [21][21] C. Wan, Z. Xu, P. Pinson, Z. Y. Dong, and K. P. Wong, 'Probabilistic forecasting of wind power generation using extreme learning machine,' IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1033-1044, 2014. -
- [22][22] A. Khosravi, S. Nahavandi, D. Creighton, and A. F. Atiya, 'Comprehensive review of neural network-based prediction intervals and new advances,' IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks , vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1341-1356, 2011. -
- [23][23] M. Sun, T. Zhang, Y. Wang, G. Strbac, and C. Kang, 'Using bayesian deep learning to capture uncertainty for residential net load forecasting,' IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 188-201, 2020. -
- [24][24] Y. Chu and C. F. Coimbra, 'Short-term probabilistic forecasts for direct normal irradiance,' Renewable Energy , vol. 101, pp. 526-536, 2017. -
- [25][25] S. Kachroudi, M. Grossard, and N. Abroug, 'Predictive driving guidance of full electric vehicles using particle swarm optimization,' IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 3909-3919, 2012. -
- [26][26] Z. J. Lee, T. Li, and S. H. Low, 'ACN-data: Analysis and applications of an open ev charging dataset,' in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Future Energy Systems , 2019, pp. 139-149. -
- [27][27] Y. He, R. Liu, H. Li, S. Wang, and X. Lu, 'Short-term power load probability density forecasting method using kernel-based support vector quantile regression and copula theory,' Applied Energy , vol. 185, pp. 254-266, 2017. -
- [28][28] T. Hong, P. Wang, and H. L. Willis, 'A na¨ ıve multiple linear regression benchmark for short term load forecasting,' in 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting , 2011, pp. 1-6. -
- [29][29] Y. Wang, N. Zhang, Y. Tan, T. Hong, D. S. Kirschen, and C. Kang, 'Combining probabilistic load forecasts,' IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 3664-3674, 2019. -
- [30][30] Y. Wang, D. Gan, M. Sun, N. Zhang, Z. Lu, and C. Kang, 'Probabilistic individual load forecasting using pinball loss guided LSTM,' Applied Energy , vol. 235, pp. 10-20, 2019. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voronin, V., Nepsha, F., & Ilyushin, P. (2024) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj15120553 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“In addition, the introduction of this requirement will require the use of an active front end in fast EVCSs, which may lead to an increase in their cost [49,50].”
- Authors
- Li, Y., He, S., Li, Y., Ge, L., Lou, S., & Zeng, Z.
- Affiliations
- Northeast Electric Power University (CN)
- China-EU Institute for Clean and Renewable Energy (CN)
- Tianjin University (CN)
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 344-357
- ISSN
- 2379-8858 (ISSN-L)
- 2379-8904
- OpenAlex
- W4224295330
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62073148)
- Tencent Rhinoceros Foundation of China (CCF-Tencent RAGR20210102)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Energy Load and Power Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
- Keywords
- electric vehicle charging stations, probabilistic forecasting, forecast uncertainty, reinforcement learning, deep learning, LSTM, Markov decision process, proximal policy optimization, adaptive exploration, EV charging behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review