The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction: rough and fuzzy-rough-based approaches
Abstract
Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction refers to the problem of selecting those input features that are most predictive of a given outcome; a problem encountered in many areas such as machine learning, pattern recognition, and signal processing. This has found successful application in tasks that involve data sets containing huge numbers of features (in the order of tens of thousands), which would be impossible to process further. Recent examples include text processing and Web content classification. One of the many successful applications of rough set theory has been to this feature selection area. This paper reviews those techniques that preserve the underlying semantics of the data, using crisp and fuzzy rough set-based methodologies. Several approaches to feature selection based on rough set theory are experimentally compared. Additionally, a new area in feature selection, feature grouping, is highlighted and a rough set-based feature grouping technique is detailed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,844
(1992) · Cited by 23,431
Pawlak, Z. (1982) · International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01001956 · Cited by 12,322
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
Shafer, G. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv10vm1qb · Cited by 11,711
UCI Repository of machine learning databases
Blake, C. L. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,582
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
Shafer, G. (1976) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691214696 · Cited by 9,083
Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data
Pawlak, Z. (1991) · Our Digital Library (Warsaw University of Technology) · Cited by 8,343
Feature selection for classification
DASH, M., & LIU, H. (1997) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1088-467x(97)00008-5 · Cited by 3,574
Pawlak, Z. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3534-4 · Cited by 3,040
Devijver, P. A., & Kittler, J. (1982) · Prentice-Hall International eBooks · Cited by 2,910
Variable precision rough set model
Ziarko, W. (1993) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(93)90048-2 · Cited by 2,036
The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm
Kira, K., & Rendell, L. A. (1992) · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 1,897
The Discernibility Matrices and Functions in Information Systems
Skowron, A., & Rauszer, C. (1992) · Intelligent Decision Support · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7975-9_21 · Cited by 1,653
Subset Selection in Regression
(2003) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2003.s144 · Cited by 1,463
TOLERANCE APPROXIMATION SPACES
Skowron, A., & Stepaniuk, J. (1996) · Fundamenta Informaticae · doi:10.3233/fi-1996-272311 · Cited by 956
Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory
(1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7975-9 · Cited by 836
Rough set methods in feature selection and recognition
Świniarski, R. W., & Skowron, A. (2002) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/s0167-8655(02)00196-4 · Cited by 816
Feature Extraction Construction and Selection: A Data Mining Perspective
MTW, Liu, H., & Motoda, H. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669967 · Cited by 713
Selection of Relevant Features in Machine Learning.
Langley, P. (1994) · doi:10.21236/ada292575 · Cited by 709
Rough-Fuzzy Hybridization: A New Trend in Decision Making
Pal, S. K., & Skowron, A. (1999) · Cited by 669
Putting Rough Sets and Fuzzy Sets Together
Didier Dubois, A., & Prade, H. M. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7975-9_14 · Cited by 637
Subset Selection in Regression
Miller, A. J. (1990) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2939-6 · Cited by 625
Learning with many irrelevant features
Almuallim, H., & Dietterich, T. G. (1991) · Cited by 623
Feature Extraction, Construction and Selection
(1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5725-8 · Cited by 573
Subset Selection in Regression.
Raab, G. M., & Miller, A. J. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532418 · Cited by 547
Learning Boolean concepts in the presence of many irrelevant features
Almuallim, H., & Dietterich, T. G. (1994) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)90084-1 · Cited by 520
Fuzzy–rough attribute reduction with application to web categorization
Jensen, R., & Shen, Q. (2004) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(03)00021-6 · Cited by 518
Self-citationNeural-network feature selector
Setiono, R., & Liu, H. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.572104 · Cited by 379
Rough Sets: Mathematical Foundations
Polkowski, L. (2002) · Physica-Verlag eBooks · Cited by 337
Pawlak, Z., & Skowron, A. (1994) · Our Digital Library (Warsaw University of Technology) · Cited by 328
Using Rough Sets with Heuristics for Feature Selection
Zhong, N., Dong, J., & Ohsuga, S. (2001) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1011219601502 · Cited by 306
Rough set-aided keyword reduction for text categorization
Chouchoulas, A., & Shen, Q. (2001) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/088395101753210773 · Cited by 269
Self-citationRough set methods and applications: new developments in knowledge discovery in information systems
Polkowski, L., Tsumoto, S., & Lin, T. Y. (2000) · Physica-Verlag GmbH eBooks · Cited by 251
Fuzzy Similarity Relation as a Basis for Rough Approximations
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-69115-4_39 · Cited by 237
From rough set theory to evidence theory
Skowron, A., & Grzymalła-Busse, J. (1994) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 236
Shen, Q., & Jensen, R. (2004) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2003.10.016 · Cited by 221
Self-citationA rough-fuzzy approach for generating classification rules
Shen, Q., & Chouchoulas, A. (2002) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(01)00229-1 · Cited by 216
Self-citationReduction algorithms based on discernibility matrix: The ordered attributes method
Wang, J., & Wang, J. (2001) · Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/bf02943234 · Cited by 211
Feature selection using rough sets theory
Modrzejewski, M. (1993) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-56602-3_138 · Cited by 206
ROUGH SET REDUCTION OF ATTRIBUTES AND THEIR DOMAINS FOR NEURAL NETWORKS
Jelonek, J., Krawiec, K., & Slowiński, R. (1995) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1995.tb00036.x · Cited by 191
Rough sets perspective on data and knowledge
Skowron, A., Komorowski, J., Pawlak, Z., et al. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · Cited by 121
Submission, H. E. (1986) · Collection Management · doi:10.1300/j105v08n03_63 · Cited by 112
Normalized Decision Functions and Measures for Inconsistent Decision Tables Analysis
Ślȩzak, D. (2000) · Fundamenta Informaticae · doi:10.3233/fun-2000-44304 · Cited by 71
Maintenance of Reducts in the Variable Precision Rough Set Model
Kryszkiewicz, M. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1461-5_18 · Cited by 32
Cited by
Pawlak, Z., & Skowron, A. (2007) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2006.06.003 · Cited by 2,070
Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) in Brain-Computer Interface
Ang, K. K., Chin, Z. Y., Zhang, H., & Guan, C. (2008) · 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2008.4634130 · Cited by 1,514
Neighborhood rough set based heterogeneous feature subset selection
Hu, Q., Yu, D., Liu, J., & Wu, C. (2008) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2008.05.024 · Cited by 1,085
HU, Q., YU, D., & XIE, Z. (2008) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.10.043 · Cited by 513
A Fitting Model for Feature Selection With Fuzzy Rough Sets
Wang, C., Qi, Y., Shao, M., Hu, Q., Chen, D., Qian, Y., & Lin, Y. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2016.2574918 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, R., & Shen, Q.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1457-1471
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168523997
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 20.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
