The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
K-Means+ID3: A Novel Method for Supervised Anomaly Detection by Cascading K-Means Clustering and ID3 Decision Tree Learning Methods
Abstract
In this paper, we present "k-means+ID3", a method to cascade k-means clustering and the ID3 decision tree learning methods for classifying anomalous and normal activities in a computer network, an active electronic circuit, and a mechanical mass-beam system. The k-means clustering method first partitions the training instances into k clusters using Euclidean distance similarity. On each cluster, representing a density region of normal or anomaly instances, we build an ID3 decision tree. The decision tree on each cluster refines the decision boundaries by learning the subgroups within the cluster. To obtain a final decision on classification, the decisions of the k-means and ID3 methods are combined using two rules: 1) the nearest-neighbor rule and 2) the nearest-consensus rule. We perform experiments on three data sets: 1) network anomaly data (NAD), 2) Duffing equation data (DED), and 3) mechanical system data (MSD), which contain measurements from three distinct application domains of computer networks, an electronic circuit implementing a forced Duffing equation, and a mechanical system, respectively. Results show that the detection accuracy of the k-means+ID3 method is as high as 96.24 percent at a false-positive-rate of 0.03 percent on NAD; the total accuracy is as high as 80.01 percent on MSD and 79.9 percent on DED
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms
Huang, J., & Ling, C. X. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2005.50 · Cited by 2,148
Parzen-window network intrusion detectors
Yeung, D.-Y., & Chow, C. (2003) · Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots · doi:10.1109/icpr.2002.1047476 · Cited by 277
Cited by
Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review
Nassif, A. B., Talib, M. A., Nasir, Q., & Dakalbab, F. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3083060 · Cited by 748
A Survey of Discretization Techniques: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis in Supervised Learning
Garcia, S., Luengo, J., Sáez, J. A., López, V., & Herrera, F. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2012.35 · Cited by 548
Botnet in DDoS Attacks: Trends and Challenges
Hoque, N., Bhattacharyya, D. K., & Kalita, J. K. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2457491 · Cited by 299
Decision Tree Based Intrusion Detection System for NSL-KDD Dataset
Ingre, B., Yadav, A., & Soni, A. K. (2018) · Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63645-0_23 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaddam, S. R., Phoha, V. V., & Balagani, K. S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-354
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104837959
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: K-Means+ID3: A Novel Method for Supervised Anomaly Detection by Cascading K-Means Clustering and ID3 Decision Tree Learning Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2007.44
- The paper
- Gaddam, S. R., Phoha, V. V., & Balagani, K. S. (2007). K-Means+ID3: A Novel Method for Supervised Anomaly Detection by Cascading K-Means Clustering and ID3 Decision Tree Learning Methods. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2007.44
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.