The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustering and Sequential Pattern Mining of Online Collaborative Learning Data
Abstract
Group work is widespread in education. The growing use of online tools supporting group work generates huge amounts of data. We aim to exploit this data to support mirroring: presenting useful high-level views of information about the group, together with desired patterns characterizing the behavior of strong groups. The goal is to enable the groups and their facilitators to see relevant aspects of the group's operation and provide feedback if these are more likely to be associated with positive or negative outcomes and indicate where the problems are. We explore how useful mirror information can be extracted via a theory-driven approach and a range of clustering and sequential pattern mining. The context is a senior software development project where students use the collaboration tool TRAC. We extract patterns distinguishing the better from the weaker groups and get insights in the success factors. The results point to the importance of leadership and group interaction, and give promising indications if they are occurring. Patterns indicating good individual practices were also identified. We found that some key measures can be mined from early data. The results are promising for advising groups at the start and early identification of effective and poor practices, in time for remediation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930
Cited by
Educational Data Mining: A review of the state of the art
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2053532 · Cited by 2,251
Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Fauzy, W. M. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.01.007 · Cited by 564
A Systematic Review on Educational Data Mining
Dutt, A., Ismail, M. A., & Herawan, T. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2654247 · Cited by 528
Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2017) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001 · Cited by 376
RapidMiner: Data Mining Use Cases and Business Analytics Applications
(2016) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16023 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Perera, D., Kay, J., Koprinska, I., Yacef, K., & Zaiane, O. R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 759-772
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139471083
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering and Sequential Pattern Mining of Online Collaborative Learning Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2008.138
- The paper
- Perera, D., Kay, J., Koprinska, I., Yacef, K., & Zaiane, O. R. (2009). Clustering and Sequential Pattern Mining of Online Collaborative Learning Data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2008.138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.