The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selecting Attributes for Sentiment Classification Using Feature Relation Networks
Abstract
A major concern when incorporating large sets of diverse n-gram features for sentiment classification is the presence of noisy, irrelevant, and redundant attributes. These concerns can often make it difficult to harness the augmented discriminatory potential of extended feature sets. We propose a rule-based multivariate text feature selection method called Feature Relation Network (FRN) that considers semantic information and also leverages the syntactic relationships between n-gram features. FRN is intended to efficiently enable the inclusion of extended sets of heterogeneous n-gram features for enhanced sentiment classification. Experiments were conducted on three online review testbeds in comparison with methods used in prior sentiment classification research. FRN outperformed the comparison univariate, multivariate, and hybrid feature selection methods; it was able to select attributes resulting in significantly better classification accuracy irrespective of the feature subset sizes. Furthermore, by incorporating syntactic information about n-gram relations, FRN is able to select features in a more computationally efficient manner than many multivariate and hybrid techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
Cited by
A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications
Ravi, K., & Ravi, V. (2015) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015 · Cited by 1,306
A comprehensive review on ensemble deep learning: Opportunities and challenges
Mohammed, A., & Kora, R. (2023) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.01.014 · Cited by 1,127
ABCDM: An Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model for sentiment analysis
Basiri, M. E., Nemati, S., Abdar, M., Cambria, E., & Acharya, U. R. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.08.005 · Cited by 745
Document-level sentiment classification: An empirical comparison between SVM and ANN
Moraes, R., Valiati, J. F., & Gavião Neto, W. P. (2013) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.059 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbasi, A., France, S., Zhang, Z., & Chen, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 447-462
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137704276
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selecting Attributes for Sentiment Classification Using Feature Relation Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2010.110
- The paper
- Abbasi, A., France, S., Zhang, Z., & Chen, H. (2011). Selecting Attributes for Sentiment Classification Using Feature Relation Networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2010.110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.