Slicing: A New Approach for Privacy Preserving Data Publishing
Abstract
Several anonymization techniques, such as generalization and bucketization, have been designed for privacy preserving microdata publishing. Recent work has shown that generalization loses considerable amount of information, especially for high-dimensional data. Bucketization, on the other hand, does not prevent membership disclosure and does not apply for data that do not have a clear separation between quasi-identifying attributes and sensitive attributes. In this paper, we present a novel technique called slicing, which partitions the data both horizontally and vertically. We show that slicing preserves better data utility than generalization and can be used for membership disclosure protection. Another important advantage of slicing is that it can handle high-dimensional data. We show how slicing can be used for attribute disclosure protection and develop an efficient algorithm for computing the sliced data that obey the ℓ-diversity requirement. Our workload experiments confirm that slicing preserves better utility than generalization and is more effective than bucketization in workloads involving the sensitive attribute. Our experiments also demonstrate that slicing can be used to prevent membership disclosure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cloud-based data sharing difficulty lies in how much trust users can place on cloud service providers, due to lack of transparency and loss of data control by users in cloud environments.
“Considering the fact that users and cloud providers usually belong to different administrative or security domains, the difficulty of cloud-based data sharing lies in how much trust users can place on cloud service providers.”
From A review of secure and privacy-preserving medical data sharing (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 312
- Authors
- Li, T., Li, N., Zhang, J., & Molloy, I.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 561-574
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019376841
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
- Keywords
- slicing, privacy-preserving data publishing, microdata anonymization, attribute disclosure, l-diversity, generalization, bucketization, high-dimensional data, data utility, sensitive attributes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review