Cited by 312Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataData Quality and ManagementAccess Control and Trust

Slicing: A New Approach for Privacy Preserving Data Publishing

Li, Tiancheng, Li, Ninghui, Zhang, Jian, Molloy, Ian·2012·IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Abstract

Several anonymization techniques, such as generalization and bucketization, have been designed for privacy preserving microdata publishing. Recent work has shown that generalization loses considerable amount of information, especially for high-dimensional data. Bucketization, on the other hand, does not prevent membership disclosure and does not apply for data that do not have a clear separation between quasi-identifying attributes and sensitive attributes. In this paper, we present a novel technique called slicing, which partitions the data both horizontally and vertically. We show that slicing preserves better data utility than generalization and can be used for membership disclosure protection. Another important advantage of slicing is that it can handle high-dimensional data. We show how slicing can be used for attribute disclosure protection and develop an efficient algorithm for computing the sliced data that obey the ℓ-diversity requirement. Our workload experiments confirm that slicing preserves better utility than generalization and is more effective than bucketization in workloads involving the sensitive attribute. Our experiments also demonstrate that slicing can be used to prevent membership disclosure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tkde.2010.236

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cloud-based data sharing difficulty lies in how much trust users can place on cloud service providers, due to lack of transparency and loss of data control by users in cloud environments.

    “Considering the fact that users and cloud providers usually belong to different administrative or security domains, the difficulty of cloud-based data sharing lies in how much trust users can place on cloud service providers.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 312

Authors
Li, T., Li, N., Zhang, J., & Molloy, I.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Published
2012-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
561-574
ISSN
1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019376841
Cited by
312
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
Keywords
slicing, privacy-preserving data publishing, microdata anonymization, attribute disclosure, l-diversity, generalization, bucketization, high-dimensional data, data utility, sensitive attributes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review