The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Knowledge-Driven Approach to Activity Recognition in Smart Homes
Abstract
This paper introduces a knowledge-driven approach to real-time, continuous activity recognition based on multisensor data streams in smart homes. The approach goes beyond the traditional data-centric methods for activity recognition in three ways. First, it makes extensive use of domain knowledge in the life cycle of activity recognition. Second, it uses ontologies for explicit context and activity modeling and representation. Third and finally, it exploits semantic reasoning and classification for activity inferencing, thus enabling both coarse-grained and fine-grained activity recognition. In this paper, we analyze the characteristics of smart homes and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) upon which we built both context and ADL ontologies. We present a generic system architecture for the proposed knowledge-driven approach and describe the underlying ontology-based recognition process. Special emphasis is placed on semantic subsumption reasoning algorithms for activity recognition. The proposed approach has been implemented in a function-rich software system, which was deployed in a smart home research laboratory. We evaluated the proposed approach and the developed system through extensive experiments involving a number of various ADL use scenarios. An average activity recognition rate of 94.44 percent was achieved and the average recognition runtime per recognition operation was measured as 2.5 seconds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tapia, E. M., Intille, S. S., Haskell, W., Larson, K., Wright, J., King, A., & Friedman, R. (2007) · 2007 11th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers · doi:10.1109/iswc.2007.4373774 · Cited by 458
Keeping the Resident in the Loop: Adapting the Smart Home to the User
Rashidi, P., & Cook, D. J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2009.2025137 · Cited by 443
Wadley, V. G., Okonkwo, O., Crowe, M., & Ross-Meadows, L. A. (2008) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.jgp.0000310780.04465.13 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Sensor-Based Activity Recognition
Chen, L., Hoey, J., Nugent, C. D., Cook, D. J., & Yu, Z. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2012.2198883 · Cited by 1,074
Self-citationLSTM-CNN Architecture for Human Activity Recognition
Xia, K., Huang, J., & Wang, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2982225 · Cited by 851
Self-citationWang, Z., Yang, Z., & Dong, T. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17020341 · Cited by 355
A Comparative Study on Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial Sensors in a Smartphone
Wang, A., Chen, G., Yang, J., Zhao, S., & Chang, C.-Y. (2016) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2016.2545708 · Cited by 324
Daily Activity Feature Selection in Smart Homes Based on Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Liu, Y., Mu, Y., Chen, K., Li, Y., & Guo, J. (2020) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-019-10185-8 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, L., Nugent, C. D., & Wang, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 961-974
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136431085
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.