The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trustworthiness Management in the Social Internet of Things
Abstract
The integration of social networking concepts into the Internet of things has led to the Social Internet of Things (SIoT) paradigm, according to which objects are capable of establishing social relationships in an autonomous way with respect to their owners with the benefits of improving the network scalability in information/service discovery. Within this scenario, we focus on the problem of understanding how the information provided by members of the social IoT has to be processed so as to build a reliable system on the basis of the behavior of the objects. We define two models for trustworthiness management starting from the solutions proposed for P2P and social networks. In the subjective model each node computes the trustworthiness of its friends on the basis of its own experience and on the opinion of the friends in common with the potential service providers. In the objective model, the information about each node is distributed and stored making use of a distributed hash table structure so that any node can make use of the same information. Simulations show how the proposed models can effectively isolate almost any malicious nodes in the network at the expenses of an increase in the network traffic for feedback exchange.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
The Internet of Things: A survey
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · Cited by 15,613
Self-citationThe Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 · Cited by 13,339
Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications
Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D., Kaashoek, M. F., & Balakrishnan, H. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/383059.383071 · Cited by 9,623
Pastry: Scalable, Decentralized Object Location, and Routing for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems
Rowstron, A., & Druschel, P. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45518-3_18 · Cited by 7,276
A scalable content-addressable network
Ratnasamy, S., Francis, P., Handley, M., Karp, R., & Shenker, S. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/383059.383072 · Cited by 6,372
The EigenTrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks
Kamvar, S. D., Schlosser, M. T., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2003) · Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on World Wide Web - WWW '03 · doi:10.1145/775152.775242 · Cited by 3,362
A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision
Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., & Boyd, C. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.019 · Cited by 3,330
The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.
Fiske, A. P. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.4.689 · Cited by 2,510
Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies
Procidano, M. E., & Heller, K. (1983) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00898416 · Cited by 2,245
Cited by
Securing Fog Computing for Internet of Things Applications: Challenges and Solutions
Ni, J., Zhang, K., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2762345 · Cited by 659
Assessment of the Suitability of Fog Computing in the Context of Internet of Things
Sarkar, S., Chatterjee, S., & Misra, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/tcc.2015.2485206 · Cited by 638
The Security of Big Data in Fog-Enabled IoT Applications Including Blockchain: A Survey
Tariq, N., Asim, M., Al-Obeidat, F., Zubair Farooqi, M., Baker, T., Hammoudeh, M., & Ghafir, I. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19081788 · Cited by 268
Machine Learning Based Trust Computational Model for IoT Services
Jayasinghe, U., Lee, G. M., Um, T.-W., & Shi, Q. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing · doi:10.1109/tsusc.2018.2839623 · Cited by 256
A survey on privacy and security of Internet of Things
Ogonji, M. M., Okeyo, G., & Wafula, J. M. (2020) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100312 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Nitti, M., Girau, R., & Atzori, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1253-1266
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123649966
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 73.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trustworthiness Management in the Social Internet of Things. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2013.105
- The paper
- Nitti, M., Girau, R., & Atzori, L. (2014). Trustworthiness Management in the Social Internet of Things. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2013.105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
