Cited by 2,410Big Data Technologies and ApplicationsInformation Retrieval and Data MiningData Mining Algorithms and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data mining with big data

Xindong Wu, Xingquan Zhu, Gong-Qing Wu, Wei Ding·2014·IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Abstract

Big Data concern large-volume, complex, growing data sets with multiple, autonomous sources. With the fast development of networking, data storage, and the data collection capacity, Big Data are now rapidly expanding in all science and engineering domains, including physical, biological and biomedical sciences. This paper presents a HACE theorem that characterizes the features of the Big Data revolution, and proposes a Big Data processing model, from the data mining perspective. This data-driven model involves demand-driven aggregation of information sources, mining and analysis, user interest modeling, and security and privacy considerations. We analyze the challenging issues in the data-driven model and also in the Big Data revolution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tkde.2013.109

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. gillick, 2006, Mapreduce Distributed Computing for Machine Learning
  2. ghoting, 2009, Hadoop-ML: An Infrastructure for the Rapid Implementation of Parallel Reusable Analytics, Proc Large-Scale Machine Learning Parallelism and Massive Data Sets Workshop (NIPS '09)
  3. bughin, 2010, Clouds Big Data and Smart Assets Ten Tech-enabled Business Trends to Watch
  4. reed, 2011, Real Time Machine Learning to Find Fast Transient Radio Anomalies: A Semi-Supervised Approach Combining Detection and RFI Excision, Proc Int'l Astronomical Union Symp Time Domain Astronomy

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Wu, X., Zhu, X., Wu, G.-Q., & Ding, W.
Affiliations
  • Hefei University of Technology (CN)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Published
2014-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
97-107
ISSN
1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040263621
Cited by
2,410
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 224 · 2020: 271 · 2019: 305 · 2018: 321 · 2017: 323 · 2016: 291 · 2015: 231 · 2014: 71
FWCI
434.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Data Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
Keywords
big data, data mining, data-driven modeling, information sources, user interest modeling, data security and privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review