Cited by 2,692Complex Network Analysis TechniquesOpinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment

Centola, Damon·2010·Science

Abstract

How do social networks affect the spread of behavior? A popular hypothesis states that networks with many clustered ties and a high degree of separation will be less effective for behavioral diffusion than networks in which locally redundant ties are rewired to provide shortcuts across the social space. A competing hypothesis argues that when behaviors require social reinforcement, a network with more clustering may be more advantageous, even if the network as a whole has a larger diameter. I investigated the effects of network structure on diffusion by studying the spread of health behavior through artificially structured online communities. Individual adoption was much more likely when participants received social reinforcement from multiple neighbors in the social network. The behavior spread farther and faster across clustered-lattice networks than across corresponding random networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1185231

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This rapid attenuation contrasts with findings in human networks, where social influence can propagate across multiple degrees of separation.

    “This rapid attenuation contrasts with findings in human networks, where social influence can propagate across multiple degrees of separation 25,27 .”
  • The web has revolutionised the practice of public health surveillance.

    “While conventional surveillance was based on health data from healthcare organisations such as hospitals, government databases and insurance companies, the web has revolutionised the practice of PHS.7”
  • An individual is much more likely to adopt a content when his/her neighbors in the social network tend to reinforce it.

    “The analysis of information and behavioral spreading on social media [17] revealed that an individual is much more likely to adopt a content when his/her neighbors in the social network tend to reinforce it [48].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Centola, D.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Centola, Damon
Venue
Science
Published
2010-09-03
Volume
329
Issue
5996
Pages
1194-1197
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2150208547
Cited by
2,692
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 158 · 2025: 176 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 177 · 2021: 245 · 2020: 192 · 2019: 177 · 2018: 202 · 2017: 208 · 2016: 178 · 2015: 202 · 2014: 197 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 115
FWCI
72.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
social networks, network structure, clustering, social reinforcement, online communities, health behavior adoption, network diameter
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Reinforcement, Psychology, Social Support, Health Behavior, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review