The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Evolutionary Multiobjective Approach for Community Discovery in Dynamic Networks
Abstract
The discovery of evolving communities in dynamic networks is an important research topic that poses challenging tasks. Evolutionary clustering is a recent framework for clustering dynamic networks that introduces the concept of temporal smoothness inside the community structure detection method. Evolutionary-based clustering approaches try to maximize cluster accuracy with respect to incoming data of the current time step, and minimize clustering drift from one time step to the successive one. In order to optimize both these two competing objectives, an input parameter that controls the preference degree of a user towards either the snapshot quality or the temporal quality is needed. In this paper the detection of communities with temporal smoothness is formulated as a multiobjective problem and a method based on genetic algorithms is proposed. The main advantage of the algorithm is that it automatically provides a solution representing the best trade-off between the accuracy of the clustering obtained, and the deviation from one time step to the successive. Experiments on synthetic data sets show the very good performance of the method when compared with state-of-the-art approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
Finding and evaluating community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.026113 · Cited by 13,931
Resolution limit in community detection
Fortunato, S., & Barthélemy, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605965104 · Cited by 3,024
Holme, P., & Saramäki, J. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.001 · Cited by 2,736 · cited 1×
“The MultiObjective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) we used is the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) proposed by Srinivas and Deb in [31] and implemented in the Genetic Algorithm and Direct Search Toolbox of MATLAB.”
MethodGraphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations
Leskovec, J., Kleinberg, J., & Faloutsos, C. (2005) · Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining · doi:10.1145/1081870.1081893 · Cited by 2,281
Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks
Mucha, P. J., Richardson, T., Macon, K., Porter, M. A., & Onnela, J.-P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1184819 · Cited by 2,123
Cited by
Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium
Holme, P. (2015) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2015-60657-4 · Cited by 734
Community detection in social networks
Bedi, P., & Sharma, C. (2016) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1178 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Folino, F., & Pizzuti, C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1838-1852
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022651954
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Evolutionary Multiobjective Approach for Community Discovery in Dynamic Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2013.131
- The paper
- Folino, F., & Pizzuti, C. (2014). An Evolutionary Multiobjective Approach for Community Discovery in Dynamic Networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2013.131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.