The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survey on Aspect-Level Sentiment Analysis
Open accessAbstract
The field of sentiment analysis, in which sentiment is gathered, analyzed, and aggregated from text, has seen a lot of attention in the last few years. The corresponding growth of the field has resulted in the emergence of various subareas, each addressing a different level of analysis or research question. This survey focuses on aspect-level sentiment analysis, where the goal is to find and aggregate sentiment on entities mentioned within documents or aspects of them. An in-depth overview of the current state-of-the-art is given, showing the tremendous progress that has already been made in finding both the target, which can be an entity as such, or some aspect of it, and the corresponding sentiment. Aspect-level sentiment analysis yields very fine-grained sentiment information which can be useful for applications in various domains. Current solutions are categorized based on whether they provide a method for aspect detection, sentiment analysis, or both. Furthermore, a breakdown based on the type of algorithm used is provided. For each discussed study, the reported performance is included. To facilitate the quantitative evaluation of the various proposed methods, a call is made for the standardization of the evaluation methodology that includes the use of shared data sets. Semanticallyrich concept-centric aspect-level sentiment analysis is discussed and identified as one of the most promising future research direction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
On Information and Sufficiency
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · Cited by 20,193
Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species
Dice, L. R. (1945) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1932409 · Cited by 11,874
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
Shafer, G. (1976) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691214696 · Cited by 9,083
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601981516 · Cited by 6,720
Opinion mining and sentiment analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000011 · Cited by 6,372
Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques
Järvelin, K., & Kekäläinen, J. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/582415.582418 · Cited by 4,841
Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization
MANN, W. C., & THOMPSON, S. A. (1988) · Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse · doi:10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243 · Cited by 3,853
Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography
Church, K., & Hanks, P. (1990) · doi:10.5555/89086.89095 · Cited by 3,590
Cited by
A survey on sentiment analysis methods, applications, and challenges
Wankhade, M., Rao, A. C. S., & Kulkarni, C. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-022-10144-1 · Cited by 1,528
A review on sentiment analysis and emotion detection from text
Nandwani, P., & Verma, R. (2021) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-021-00776-6 · Cited by 869
Deep Learning for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Review
Do, H. H., Prasad, P., Maag, A., & Alsadoon, A. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.003 · Cited by 614
A Survey on Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: Tasks, Methods, and Challenges
Zhang, W., Li, X., Deng, Y., Bing, L., & Lam, W. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3230975 · Cited by 567
Mohammad, S. M. (2016) · Emotion Measurement · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100508-8.00009-6 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Schouten, K., & Frasincar, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2016-03-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 813-830
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2253519362
- Cited by
- 832
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 44.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survey on Aspect-Level Sentiment Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2015.2485209
- The paper
- Schouten, K., & Frasincar, F. (2016). Survey on Aspect-Level Sentiment Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2015.2485209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.