Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gatt, A., & Krahmer, E. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.5477 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Spoken dialogue technology: enabling the conversational user interface
McTear, M. F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505285 · Cited by 571
Revisiting readability: a unified framework for predicting text quality
Pitler, E., & Nenkova, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '08 · doi:10.3115/1613715.1613742 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Visual task characterization for automated visual discourse synthesis
Zhou, M. X., & Feiner, S. K. (1998) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '98 · doi:10.1145/274644.274698 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metrics
Pagnoni, A., Balachandran, V., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.383 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
A survey on aspect-based sentiment classification
Brauwers, G., & Frasincar, F. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3503044 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Explanation in Second Generation Expert Systems
Swartout, W. R., & Moore, J. D. (1993) · Second Generation Expert Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-77927-5_24 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Automatic detection of Incoherent speech for diagnosing schizophrenia
Iter, D., Yoon, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Keyboard to Clinic · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-0615 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Using rhetorical structure in sentiment analysis
Hogenboom, A., Frasincar, F., de Jong, F., & Kaymak, U. (2015) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2699418 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions
Kilicoglu, H. (2017) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx057 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Lacson, R. C., Barzilay, R., & Long, W. J. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.009 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Talk2Me: Automated linguistic data collection for personal assessment
Komeili, M., Pou-Prom, C., Liaqat, D., Fraser, K. C., Yancheva, M., & Rudzicz, F. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212342 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Automatic endpoint detection to support the systematic review process.
Blake, C., & Lucic, A. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.004 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Rhetorical Figure Detection: the Case of Chiasmus
Dubremetz, M., & Nivre, J. (2015) · Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature · doi:10.3115/v1/w15-0703 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Rhetorical Structure and Reader Manipulation in Agatha Christie's Murder on the Orient Express
Alexander, M. (2009) · Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies · doi:10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20099713 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- MANN, W. C., & THOMPSON, S. A.
- ORCID
- THOMPSON, SANDRA A.
- Venue
- Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0165-4888 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4117
- OpenAlex
- W2045738181
- Cited by
- 3,853
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 191 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 202 · 2020: 198 · 2019: 288 · 2018: 202 · 2017: 217 · 2016: 192 · 2015: 160 · 2014: 195 · 2013: 150 · 2012: 154
- FWCI
- 63.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Text and Talk (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic research and analysis
- Keywords
- Rhetorical Structure Theory, text structure, functional theory, discourse structure, text linguistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review