The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crowdsourced Data Management: A Survey
Abstract
Any important data management and analytics tasks cannot be completely addressed by automated processes. These tasks, such as entity resolution, sentiment analysis, and image recognition can be enhanced through the use of human cognitive ability. Crowdsouring platforms are an effective way to harness the capabilities of people (i.e., the crowd) to apply human computation for such tasks. Thus, crowdsourced data management has become an area of increasing interest in research and industry. We identify three important problems in crowdsourced data management. (1) Quality Control: Workers may return noisy or incorrect results so effective techniques are required to achieve high quality; (2) Cost Control: The crowd is not free, and cost control aims to reduce the monetary cost; (3) Latency Control: The human workers can be slow, particularly compared to automated computing time scales, so latency-control techniques are required. There has been significant work addressing these three factors for designing crowdsourced tasks, developing crowdsourced data manipulation operators, and optimizing plans consisting of multiple operators. In this paper, we survey and synthesize a wide spectrum of existing studies on crowdsourced data management. Based on this analysis we then outline key factors that need to be considered to improve crowdsourced data management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
(2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2004.842673 · Cited by 24,496
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
(2009) · Cited by 6,153
A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching
Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P. A. (2001) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s007780100057 · Cited by 3,352
Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons
Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2334029 · Cited by 2,412
Borzsony, S., Kossmann, D., & Stocker, K. (2002) · Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.2001.914855 · Cited by 2,266
A View of the Em Algorithm that Justifies Incremental, Sparse, and other Variants
Neal, R. M., & Hinton, G. E. (1998) · Learning in Graphical Models · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9_12 · Cited by 2,187
Automated Planning: Theory & Practice
Nau, D. S., Ghallab, M., & Traverso, P. (2004) · HAL · Cited by 2,129
Cited by
The ApolloScape Open Dataset for Autonomous Driving and Its Application
Huang, X., Wang, P., Cheng, X., Zhou, D., Geng, Q., & Yang, R. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2926463 · Cited by 615
Truth inference in crowdsourcing: is the problem solved?
Zheng, Y., Li, G., Li, Y., Shan, C., & Cheng, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3055540.3055547 · Cited by 421
Self-citationKnowledge Graph Quality Management: a Comprehensive Survey
Xue, B., & Zou, L. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3150080 · Cited by 108
Knowledge Learning With Crowdsourcing: A Brief Review and Systematic Perspective
Zhang, J. (2022) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2022.105434 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, G., Wang, J., Zheng, Y., & Franklin, M. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2296-2319
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329105431
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 62.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crowdsourced Data Management: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2016.2535242
- The paper
- Li, G., Wang, J., Zheng, Y., & Franklin, M. J. (2016). Crowdsourced Data Management: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2016.2535242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.