The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection With Deep Learning
Open accessAbstract
Anomalies are rare observations (e.g., data records or events) that deviate significantly from the others in the sample. Over the past few decades, research on anomaly mining has received increasing interests due to the implications of these occurrences in a wide range of disciplines - for instance, security, finance, and medicine. For this reason, anomaly detection, which aims to identify these rare observations, has become one of the most vital tasks in the world and has shown its power in preventing detrimental events, such as financial fraud, network intrusions, and social spam. The detection task is typically solved by identifying outlying data points in the feature space, which, inherently, overlooks the relational information in real-world data. At the same time, graphs have been prevalently used to represent the structural/relational information, which raises thegraph anomaly detection problem- identifying anomalous graph objects (i.e., nodes, edges and sub-graphs) in a single graph, or anomalous graphs in a set/database of graphs. Conventional anomaly detection techniques cannot tackle this problem well because of the complexity of graph data (e.g., irregular structures, relational dependencies, node/edge types/attributes/directions/multiplicities/weights, large scale, etc.). However, thanks to the advent of deep learning in breaking these limitations, graph anomaly detection with deep learning has received a growing attention recently. In this survey, we aim to provide a systematic and comprehensive review of the contemporary deep learning techniques for graph anomaly detection. Specifically, we provide a taxonomy that follows a task-driven strategy and categorizes existing work according to the anomalous graph objects that they can detect. We especially focus on the challenges in this research area and discuss the key intuitions, technical details as well as relative strengths and weaknesses of various techniques in each category. From the survey results, we highlight 12 future research directions spanning unsolved and emerging problems introduced by graph data, anomaly detection, deep learning and real-world applications. Additionally, to provide a wealth of useful resources for future studies, we have compiled a set of open-source implementations, public datasets, and commonly-used evaluation metrics. With this survey, our goal is to create a “one-stop-shop” that provides a unified understanding of the problem categories and existing approaches, publicly available hands-on resources, and high-impact open challenges for graph anomaly detection using deep learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
(1996) · Cited by 20,179
GAN(Generative Adversarial Nets)
(2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 19,270
Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.10903 · Cited by 12,107
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., & Yu, P. S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.2978386 · Cited by 11,000
node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks
Grover, A., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939754 · Cited by 10,926
Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs
Hamilton, W. L., Ying, R., & Leskovec, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02216 · Cited by 10,639
DeepWalk: online learning of social representations
Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Skiena, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623732 · Cited by 10,123
Veličković, P., Casanova, A., Liò, P., Cucurull, G., Romero, A., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.17863/cam.48429 · Cited by 8,657
Cited by
eFraudCom: An E-commerce Fraud Detection System via Competitive Graph Neural Networks
Zhang, G., Li, Z., Huang, J., Wu, J., Zhou, C., Yang, J., & Gao, J. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3474379 · Cited by 177
Self-citationInterpretable Anomaly Detection with DIFFI: Depth-based feature importance of Isolation Forest
Carletti, M., Terzi, M., & Susto, G. A. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105730 · Cited by 118
One-Class Anomaly Detection for Industrial Applications: A Comparative Survey and Experimental Study
Paolini, D., Dini, P., Soldaini, E., & Saponara, S. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14070281 · Cited by 21
Detecting malicious IoT network communication through Graph Neural Networks in real-world conditions
Carletti, V., Foggia, P., Rosa, F., & Vento, M. (2025) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2025.01.010 · Cited by 12
A Deep Multi-View Framework for Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks (Extended Abstract)
Peng, Z., Luo, M., Li, J., Xue, L., & Zheng, Q. (2023) · 2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde55515.2023.00326 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, X., Wu, J., Xue, S., Yang, J., Zhou, C., Sheng, Q. Z., Xiong, H., & Akoglu, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2023-12-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 12012-12038
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2191
- 2326-3865
- OpenAlex
- W3171259348
- Cited by
- 835
- References
- 205
- FWCI
- 38.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection With Deep Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2021.3118815
- The paper
- Ma, X., Wu, J., Xue, S., Yang, J., Zhou, C., Sheng, Q. Z., Xiong, H., & Akoglu, L. (2023). A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection With Deep Learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2021.3118815
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.