Cited by 10,123Advanced Graph Neural NetworksComplex Network Analysis TechniquesTopic Modeling

DeepWalk: online learning of social representations

Open access
Perozzi, Bryan, Al-Rfou, Rami, Skiena, Steven·2014·Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining

Abstract

We present DeepWalk, a novel approach for learning latent representations of vertices in a network. These latent representations encode social relations in a continuous vector space, which is easily exploited by statistical models. DeepWalk generalizes recent advancements in language modeling and unsupervised feature learning (or deep learning) from sequences of words to graphs.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

DeepWalk learns latent representations of graph vertices by treating truncated random walks as sentences and applying neural language modeling (SkipGram with hierarchical softmax). It outperforms several network-classification baselines, especially when labeled data are sparse, and scales to large graphs such as YouTube.

Key findings

  • DeepWalk’s representations improve multi-label node classification over baselines; the abstract reports F1 scores up to 10% higher than competing methods when labeled data is sparse, and in some experiments it outperforms all baselines while using 60% less training data.
  • On BlogCatalog, when trained with only 20% of nodes labeled, DeepWalk performs better than EdgeCluster, Modularity, and wvRN when those methods are given 90% of the data; it also beats SpectralClustering when labeled data is sparse on MacroF1 (TR ≤ 20%) and MicroF1 (TR ≤ 60%).
  • On Flickr, DeepWalk outperforms all baselines by at least 3% MicroF1; its MicroF1 at 3% labeled data beats all other methods at 10% labeled data. On YouTube, at 1% labeled nodes, MicroF1 improves by 14% and MacroF1 by 10% over EdgeCluster, ending with a 3% MicroF1 and 5% MacroF1 lead.
  • Parameter sensitivity shows most benefit from starting γ = 30 walks per node, with diminishing returns after γ > 10; optimal dimensionality depends on the number of training examples.

Methods

  • DeepWalk uses a random walk generator and an update procedure: for each vertex, it samples γ truncated random walks of length t, then applies SkipGram over windows of size w to learn a |V| × d representation matrix Φ. Hierarchical softmax reduces the cost of predicting context vertices from O(|V|) to O(log |V|), and stochastic gradient descent (with an asynchronous variant for parallelization) optimizes the parameters.
  • Experiments use three social networks: BlogCatalog (|V| = 10,312; |E| = 333,983; |Y| = 39), Flickr (|V| = 80,513; |E| = 5,899,882; |Y| = 195), and YouTube (|V| = 1,138,499; |E| = 2,990,443; |Y| = 47).
  • Multi-label classification is evaluated by randomly sampling a training ratio of labeled nodes, repeating 10 times, and reporting MacroF1 and MicroF1 using one-vs-rest logistic regression via LibLinear. Baselines are SpectralClustering, Modularity, EdgeCluster, wvRN, and Majority; main DeepWalk results use γ = 80, w = 10, d = 128, while sensitivity tests fix w = 10 and t = 40.

Limitations

  • The paper does not include an explicit limitations section; it states future work will focus on strengthening the theoretical justifications of the method.
  • Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to multi-label classification on three social networks (BlogCatalog, Flickr, YouTube), and two baselines (SpectralClustering and Modularity) could not run on YouTube because of its size.
  • Evident from the text: streaming and non-random-walk variants are described as possible extensions, but they are not experimentally evaluated in this paper.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2623330.2623732

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    DeepWalk shows significantly increased classification performance in the presence of label sparsity, with improvements 5%-10% of Micro F1 on the sparsest problems considered.

    “We show significantly increased classification performance in the presence of label sparsity, getting improvements 5%-10% of Micro F 1 , on the sparsest problems we consider.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § ABSTRACT · p. 1

    DeepWalk outperforms challenging baselines that are allowed a global view of the network, especially in the presence of missing information.

    “Our results show that DeepWalk outperforms challenging baselines which are allowed a global view of the network, especially in the presence of missing information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation
    § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    DeepWalk outperforms other latent representation methods for creating social dimensions, especially when labeled nodes are scarce.

    “DeepWalk outperforms other latent representation methods for creating social dimensions [39, 41], especially when labeled nodes are scarce.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] [41] L. Tang and H. Liu. Leveraging social media networks for classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 23(3):447-478, 2011. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data
    § 3.2 Connection: Power laws · p. 3

    Word frequency in natural language follows a power-law distribution similar to vertex frequency in random walks.

    “Word frequency in natural language follows a similar distribution, and techniques from language modeling account for this distributional behavior.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.2 Connection: Power laws · p. 3 · plain
      “The first comes from a series of short random walks on a scale-free graph, and the second comes from the text of 100,000 articles from the English Wikipedia.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations · p. 1

    Linearly separable portions of the 2D embedding correspond to clusters found through modularity maximization in the input graph.

    “Beyond the striking similarity, we note that linearly separable portions of (1b) correspond to clusters found through modularity maximization in the input graph (1a) (shown as vertex colors).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 4.2 Algorithm: DeepWalk · p. 4

    Random walks with restarts show no advantage over those without restarts in preliminary results.

    “These walks could have restarts (i.e. a teleport probability of returning back to their root), but our preliminary results did not show any advantage of using restarts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § ABSTRACT · p. 1

    DeepWalk is scalable; it is an online learning algorithm that builds useful incremental results and is trivially parallelizable.

    “DeepWalk is also scalable. It is an online learning algorithm which builds useful incremental results, and is trivially parallelizable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 6.1.2 Flickr · p. 6

    On Flickr, DeepWalk performs quite well in MacroF1, initially performing close to SpectralClustering, but distancing itself to a 1% improvement.

    “It also performs quite well in MacroF 1 , initially performing close to SpectralClustering, but distancing itself to a 1% improvement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 6.2.2 Effect of sampling frequency · p. 8

    Increasing γ has a big effect on results initially, but this effect quickly slows for γ > 10.

    “Initially, increasing γ has a big effect in the results, but this effect quickly slows ( γ > 10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 Datasets · p. 6

    BlogCatalog is a network of social relationships provided by blogger authors.

    “BlogCatalog [39] is a network of social relationships provided by blogger authors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6

    The eigenvectors of the Modularity matrix encode information about modular graph partitions of G.

    “The eigenvectors of B encode information about modular graph partitions of G [34].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] [34] M. E. Newman. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 103(23):8577-8582, 2006. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    DeepWalk's representations are general and can be combined with any classification method, including iterative inference methods.

    “Our representations are general, and can be combined with any classification method (including iterative inference methods).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6

    EdgeCluster uses k-means clustering to cluster the adjacency matrix of G.

    “EdgeCluster [40]: This method uses k -means clustering to cluster the adjacency matrix of G .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] [40] L. Tang and H. Liu. Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , pages 1107-1116. ACM, 2009. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6

    Modularity generates a representation in R^d from the top-d eigenvectors of the Modularity matrix of G.

    “Modularity [39]: This method generates a representation in R d from the topd eigenvectors of B , the Modularity matrix of G .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6

    EdgeCluster has been shown to perform comparably to the Modularity method, with the added advantage of scaling to graphs which are too large for spectral decomposition.

    “Its has been shown to perform comparably to the Modularity method, with the added advantage of scaling to graphs which are too large for spectral decomposition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] [40] L. Tang and H. Liu. Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , pages 1107-1116. ACM, 2009. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 Datasets · p. 6

    Flickr is a network of contacts between users of the photo sharing website.

    “Flickr [39] is a network of the contacts between users of the photo sharing website.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ABSTRACT · p. 1

    DeepWalk's representations are suitable for a broad class of real world applications such as network classification and anomaly detection.

    “These qualities make it suitable for a broad class of real world applications such as network classification, and anomaly detection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.3 · p. 3

    Solving the optimization problem builds representations that capture shared similarities in local graph structure between vertices; vertices with similar neighborhoods acquire similar representations, allowing generalization.

    “Solving the optimization problem from Eq. 2 builds representations that capture the shared similarities in local graph structure between vertices. Vertices which have similar neighborhoods will acquire similar representations (encoding cocitation similarity), and allowing generalization on machine learning tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 1

    DeepWalk's representation quality is not influenced by the choice of labeled vertices, so they can be shared among tasks.

    “Our representation quality is not influenced by the choice of labeled vertices, so they can be shared among tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 Datasets · p. 6

    In Flickr, the labels represent the interest groups of the users.

    “The labels represent the interest groups of the users such as ' black and white photos '.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6

    wvRN is a weighted-vote Relational Neighbor relational classifier.

    “wvRN [24]: The weighted-vote Relational Neighbor is a relational classifier.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] [24] S. A. Macskassy and F. Provost. A simple relational classifier. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining (MRDM-2003) at KDD-2003 , pages 64-76, 2003. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 Datasets · p. 6

    YouTube is a social network between users of the popular video sharing website.

    “YouTube [40] is a social network between users of the popular video sharing website.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] [40] L. Tang and H. Liu. Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , pages 1107-1116. ACM, 2009. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6

    SpectralClustering generates a representation in R^d from the d-smallest eigenvectors of the normalized graph Laplacian of G.

    “SpectralClustering [41]: This method generates a representation in R d from the d -smallest eigenvectors of ˜ L , the normalized graph Laplacian of G .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] [41] L. Tang and H. Liu. Leveraging social media networks for classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 23(3):447-478, 2011. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 Datasets · p. 6

    In YouTube, the labels represent groups of viewers that enjoy common video genres.

    “The labels here represent groups of viewers that enjoy common video genres (e.g. anime and wrestling ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] [40] L. Tang and H. Liu. Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , pages 1107-1116. ACM, 2009. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 Datasets · p. 6

    In BlogCatalog, the labels represent the topic categories provided by the authors.

    “The labels represent the topic categories provided by the authors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 7.1 Relational Learning · p. 8

    Exact inference in the collective classification problem is NP-hard.

    “Exact inference in the collective classification problem is NP-hard, and solutions have focused on the use of approximate inference algorithm which may not be guaranteed to converge [37].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] [37] P. Sen, G. Namata, M. Bilgic, L. Getoor, B. Galligher, and T. Eliassi-Rad. Collective classification in network data. AI magazine , 29(3):93, 2008. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6

    wvRN estimates Pr(y_i|N_i) with the appropriately normalized weighted mean of its neighbors.

    “Given the neighborhood N i of vertex v i , wvRN estimates Pr( y i |N i ) with the (appropriately normalized) weighted mean of its neighbors”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] [24] S. A. Macskassy and F. Provost. A simple relational classifier. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining (MRDM-2003) at KDD-2003 , pages 64-76, 2003. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 7.1 Relational Learning · p. 9

    Graph Kernels are quite slow unless approximated.

    “Graph Kernels [42] have been proposed as a way to use relational data as part of the classification process, but are quite slow unless approximated [19].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] [19] U. Kang, H. Tong, and J. Sun. Fast random walk graph kernel. In SDM , pages 828-838, 2012. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 7. RELATED WORK · p. 8

    DeepWalk is a scalable online method which uses only local information.

    “We propose a scalable online method which uses only local information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 7.1 Relational Learning · p. 8

    Solutions to collective classification have focused on approximate inference algorithms which may not be guaranteed to converge.

    “Exact inference in the collective classification problem is NP-hard, and solutions have focused on the use of approximate inference algorithm which may not be guaranteed to converge [37].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] [37] P. Sen, G. Namata, M. Bilgic, L. Getoor, B. Galligher, and T. Eliassi-Rad. Collective classification in network data. AI magazine , 29(3):93, 2008. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 7. RELATED WORK · p. 8

    Most methods require global information and are offline.

    “Most methods require global information and are offline [16,39-41].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [16] [16] K. Henderson, B. Gallagher, L. Li, L. Akoglu, T. Eliassi-Rad, H. Tong, and C. Faloutsos. It's who you know: Graph mining using recursive structural features. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '11, pages 663-671, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] [40] L. Tang and H. Liu. Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , pages 1107-1116. ACM, 2009. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] [41] L. Tang and H. Liu. Leveraging social media networks for classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 23(3):447-478, 2011. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 7.2 Unsupervised Feature Learning · p. 9

    Distributed representations have been proposed to model structural relationship between concepts.

    “Distributed representations have been proposed to model structural relationship between concepts [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] [17] G. E. Hinton. Learning distributed representations of concepts. In Proceedings of the eighth annual conference of the cognitive science society , pages 1-12. Amherst, MA, 1986. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 7.2 Unsupervised Feature Learning · p. 9

    Neural networks have made advancements in computer vision, speech recognition, and natural language processing.

    “these networks have made advancements in diverse fields such as computer vision [21], speech recognition [7], and natural language processing [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21] [21] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In NIPS , volume 1, page 4, 2012. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [7] [7] G. E. Dahl, D. Yu, L. Deng, and A. Acero. Context-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition. Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on , 20(1):30-42, 2012. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] [6] R. Collobert and J. Weston. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning , pages 160-167. ACM, 2008. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6

    wvRN has shown surprisingly good performance in real networks, and has been advocated as a sensible relational classification baseline.

    “It has shown surprisingly good performance in real networks, and has been advocated as a sensible relational classification baseline [25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] [25] S. A. Macskassy and F. Provost. Classification in networked data: A toolkit and a univariate case study. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 8:935-983, 2007. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 8. CONCLUSIONS · p. 9

    DeepWalk is parallelizable, allowing workers to update different parts of the model concurrently.

    “We also show that our approach is parallelizable, allowing workers to update different parts of the model concurrently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
30 of 30
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In relational classification, links between feature vectors violate the traditional i.i.d. assumption.

    “In the relational classification problem, the links between feature vectors violate the traditional i.i.d. assumption.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The social networks to which DeepWalk is applied have degree distributions that follow a power law (are scale-free).

    “If the degree distribution of a connected graph follows a power law (is scale-free ), we observe that the frequency which vertices appear in the short random walks will also follow a power-law distribution.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Network embedding contains non-deep learning methods such as matrix factorization and random walks.

    “On the other hand, network embedding contains other non-deep learning methods such as matrix factorization [33], [34] and random walks [35].”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Graph embedding methods like node2vec and DeepWalk cannot be applied to the Pinterest setting.

    “graph embedding methods like node2vec [17] and DeepWalk [26] cannot be applied here.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • YouTube section calls the 1% sample test data

    Minor

    The experimental procedure says the sampled labeled nodes are used for training and the remainder for testing, whereas the YouTube section calls the 1% sample test data.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. L. Bottou . Stochastic gradient learning in neural networks . In Proceedings of Neuro-Nîmes 91 , Nimes, France , 1991 . EC2. L. Bottou. Stochastic gradient learning in neural networks. In Proceedings of Neuro-Nîmes 91, Nimes, France, 1991. EC2.
  2. J. Dean , G. Corrado , R. Monga , K. Chen , M. Devin , Q. Le , M. Mao , M. Ranzato , A. Senior , P. Tucker , K. Yang , and A. Ng . Large scale distributed deep networks. In P. Bartlett, F. Pereira, C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Weinberger, editors , Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 , pages 1232 -- 1240 . 2012 . J. Dean, G. Corrado, R. Monga, K. Chen, M. Devin, Q. Le, M. Mao, M. Ranzato, A. Senior, P. Tucker, K. Yang, and A. Ng. Large scale distributed deep networks. In P. Bartlett, F. Pereira, C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25, pages 1232--1240. 2012.
  3. 10.5555/1883692.1883693 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/asi.v58:7 · DOI
  5. T. Mikolov , W.-t. Yih , and G. Zweig . Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations . In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT , pages 746 -- 751 , 2013 . T. Mikolov, W.-t. Yih, and G. Zweig. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 746--751, 2013.
  6. J. Neville and D. Jensen . Iterative classification in relational data . In Proc. AAAI-2000 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data , pages 13 -- 20 , 2000 . J. Neville and D. Jensen. Iterative classification in relational data. In Proc. AAAI-2000 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data, pages 13--20, 2000.
  7. S. Vishwanathan , N. N. Schraudolph , R. Kondor , and K. M. Borgwardt . Graph kernels . The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 99 : 1201 -- 1242 , 2010 . S. Vishwanathan, N. N. Schraudolph, R. Kondor, and K. M. Borgwardt. Graph kernels. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 99:1201--1242, 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Skiena, S.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-08-24
Pages
701-710
OpenAlex
W2154851992
Cited by
10,123
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 412 · 2025: 873 · 2024: 1086 · 2023: 1219 · 2022: 1276 · 2021: 1620 · 2020: 1398 · 2019: 1166 · 2018: 661 · 2017: 281 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
80.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Google (Faculty Research Award)
  • Division of Information and Intelligent Systems (DBI-1060572 and IIS-1017181)
  • Division of Biological Infrastructure (DBI-1060572 and IIS-1017181)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
DeepWalk, graph embedding, social networks, random walks, unsupervised feature learning, graph representation learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review