DeepWalk: online learning of social representations
Open accessAbstract
We present DeepWalk, a novel approach for learning latent representations of vertices in a network. These latent representations encode social relations in a continuous vector space, which is easily exploited by statistical models. DeepWalk generalizes recent advancements in language modeling and unsupervised feature learning (or deep learning) from sequences of words to graphs.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DeepWalk learns latent representations of graph vertices by treating truncated random walks as sentences and applying neural language modeling (SkipGram with hierarchical softmax). It outperforms several network-classification baselines, especially when labeled data are sparse, and scales to large graphs such as YouTube.
Key findings
- DeepWalk’s representations improve multi-label node classification over baselines; the abstract reports F1 scores up to 10% higher than competing methods when labeled data is sparse, and in some experiments it outperforms all baselines while using 60% less training data.
- On BlogCatalog, when trained with only 20% of nodes labeled, DeepWalk performs better than EdgeCluster, Modularity, and wvRN when those methods are given 90% of the data; it also beats SpectralClustering when labeled data is sparse on MacroF1 (TR ≤ 20%) and MicroF1 (TR ≤ 60%).
- On Flickr, DeepWalk outperforms all baselines by at least 3% MicroF1; its MicroF1 at 3% labeled data beats all other methods at 10% labeled data. On YouTube, at 1% labeled nodes, MicroF1 improves by 14% and MacroF1 by 10% over EdgeCluster, ending with a 3% MicroF1 and 5% MacroF1 lead.
- Parameter sensitivity shows most benefit from starting γ = 30 walks per node, with diminishing returns after γ > 10; optimal dimensionality depends on the number of training examples.
Methods
- DeepWalk uses a random walk generator and an update procedure: for each vertex, it samples γ truncated random walks of length t, then applies SkipGram over windows of size w to learn a |V| × d representation matrix Φ. Hierarchical softmax reduces the cost of predicting context vertices from O(|V|) to O(log |V|), and stochastic gradient descent (with an asynchronous variant for parallelization) optimizes the parameters.
- Experiments use three social networks: BlogCatalog (|V| = 10,312; |E| = 333,983; |Y| = 39), Flickr (|V| = 80,513; |E| = 5,899,882; |Y| = 195), and YouTube (|V| = 1,138,499; |E| = 2,990,443; |Y| = 47).
- Multi-label classification is evaluated by randomly sampling a training ratio of labeled nodes, repeating 10 times, and reporting MacroF1 and MicroF1 using one-vs-rest logistic regression via LibLinear. Baselines are SpectralClustering, Modularity, EdgeCluster, wvRN, and Majority; main DeepWalk results use γ = 80, w = 10, d = 128, while sensitivity tests fix w = 10 and t = 40.
Limitations
- The paper does not include an explicit limitations section; it states future work will focus on strengthening the theoretical justifications of the method.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to multi-label classification on three social networks (BlogCatalog, Flickr, YouTube), and two baselines (SpectralClustering and Modularity) could not run on YouTube because of its size.
- Evident from the text: streaming and non-random-walk variants are described as possible extensions, but they are not experimentally evaluated in this paper.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
DeepWalk shows significantly increased classification performance in the presence of label sparsity, with improvements 5%-10% of Micro F1 on the sparsest problems considered.
“We show significantly increased classification performance in the presence of label sparsity, getting improvements 5%-10% of Micro F 1 , on the sparsest problems we consider.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ ABSTRACT · p. 1
DeepWalk outperforms challenging baselines that are allowed a global view of the network, especially in the presence of missing information.
“Our results show that DeepWalk outperforms challenging baselines which are allowed a global view of the network, especially in the presence of missing information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
DeepWalk outperforms other latent representation methods for creating social dimensions, especially when labeled nodes are scarce.
“DeepWalk outperforms other latent representation methods for creating social dimensions [39, 41], especially when labeled nodes are scarce.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] [41] L. Tang and H. Liu. Leveraging social media networks for classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 23(3):447-478, 2011. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 3.2 Connection: Power laws · p. 3
Word frequency in natural language follows a power-law distribution similar to vertex frequency in random walks.
“Word frequency in natural language follows a similar distribution, and techniques from language modeling account for this distributional behavior.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2 Connection: Power laws · p. 3 · plain
“The first comes from a series of short random walks on a scale-free graph, and the second comes from the text of 100,000 articles from the English Wikipedia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.2 Connection: Power laws · p. 3 · plain
- Findingown data§ DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations · p. 1
Linearly separable portions of the 2D embedding correspond to clusters found through modularity maximization in the input graph.
“Beyond the striking similarity, we note that linearly separable portions of (1b) correspond to clusters found through modularity maximization in the input graph (1a) (shown as vertex colors).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingnone given§ 3.2 Connection: Power laws · p. 3
The frequency with which vertices appear in short random walks on a scale-free graph follows a power-law distribution.
“If the degree distribution of a connected graph follows a power law (is scale-free ), we observe that the frequency which vertices appear in the short random walks will also follow a power-law distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The social networks to which DeepWalk is applied have degree distributions that follow a power law (are scale-free).
- Findingown data§ 4.3 Parallelizability · p. 5
Parallelizing DeepWalk shows no loss of predictive performance relative to running DeepWalk serially.
“It also shows that there is no loss of predictive performance relative to the running DeepWalk serially (Figure 4b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
DeepWalk demonstrates scalability by building representations of web-scale graphs (such as YouTube) using a parallel implementation.
“We demonstrate the scalability of our algorithm by building representations of web-scale graphs, (such as YouTube) using a parallel implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations · p. 1
The learned representation encodes community structure so it can be easily exploited by standard classification methods.
“The learned representation encodes community structure so it can be easily exploited by standard classification methods.”
- Also stated in: § DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations · p. 1 · plain
“Note the correspondence between community structure in the input graph and the embedding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations · p. 1 · plain
- Findingown data§ ABSTRACT · p. 1
DeepWalk's representations can provide F1 scores up to 10% higher than competing methods when labeled data is sparse.
“DeepWalk 's representations can provide F 1 scores up to 10% higher than competing methods when labeled data is sparse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Parallelizability · p. 5
Parallelizing DeepWalk shows consistent speedup in processing BlogCatalog and Flickr networks as workers increase to 8.
“It shows the speed up in processing BlogCatalog and Flickr networks is consistent as we increase the number of workers to 8 (Figure 4a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ ABSTRACT · p. 1
In some experiments, DeepWalk's representations outperform all baseline methods while using 60% less training data.
“In some experiments, DeepWalk 's representations are able to outperform all baseline methods while using 60% less training data.”
- Also stated in: § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2 · plain
“In some cases, DeepWalk 's representations can outperform its competitors even when given 60% less training data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2 · plain
- Findingnone given§ 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
Strong performance with DeepWalk's representations is possible with very simple linear classifiers (e.g., logistic regression).
“Strong performance with our representations is possible with very simple linear classifiers (e.g. logistic regression).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.3 YouTube · p. 6
On YouTube, the lead of DeepWalk over EdgeCluster narrows as the training data increases.
“This lead narrows as the training data increases”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.1 BlogCatalog · p. 6
On BlogCatalog, DeepWalk outperforms SpectralClustering on MicroF1 when the training ratio is at most 60%.
“DeepWalk still outperforms when labeled data is sparse on both MacroF 1 ( T R ≤ 20%) and MicroF 1 ( T R ≤ 60%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.3 YouTube · p. 6
On YouTube, DeepWalk ends with a 5% improvement in MacroF1 over EdgeCluster.
“an impressive 5% improvement in MacroF 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.2.1 Effect of Dimensionality · p. 8
The relative performance between different dimensions is relatively stable across different values of γ.
“The relative performance between dimensions is relatively stable across different values of γ .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.3 YouTube · p. 6
On YouTube, DeepWalk ends with a 3% lead in MicroF1 over EdgeCluster.
“DeepWalk ends with a 3% lead in MicroF 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.2 Flickr · p. 6
On Flickr, DeepWalk's MicroF1 performance when only 3% of the graph is labeled beats all other methods even when they have been given 10% of the data.
“Additionally, its MicroF 1 performance when only 3% of the graph is labeled beats all other methods even when they have been given 10% of the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.2.1 Effect of Dimensionality · p. 8
The relative difference between different values of γ is quite consistent between Flickr and BlogCatalog.
“The second is that the relative difference between different values of γ is quite consistent between the two graphs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.2.1 Effect of Dimensionality · p. 8
The performance of the DeepWalk model depends on the number of random walks it has seen.
“They also show that the performance of the model depends on the number of random walks it has seen, and the appropriate dimensionality of the model depends on the training examples available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.1 BlogCatalog · p. 6
On BlogCatalog, when trained with only 20% of the nodes labeled, DeepWalk performs better than EdgeCluster, Modularity, and wvRN when they are given 90% of the data.
“In fact, when trained with only 20% of the nodes labeled, DeepWalk performs better than these approaches when they are given 90% of the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.2 Flickr · p. 6
On Flickr, DeepWalk outperforms all baselines by at least 3% with respect to MicroF1.
“DeepWalk outperforms all baselines by at least 3% with respect to MicroF 1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.2.1 Effect of Dimensionality · p. 8
Most of the benefit is accomplished by starting γ = 30 walks per node in both Flickr and BlogCatalog.
“The first is that there is most of the benefit is accomplished by starting γ = 30 walks per node in both graphs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.1 BlogCatalog · p. 6
On BlogCatalog, DeepWalk outperforms SpectralClustering on MacroF1 when the training ratio is at most 20%.
“DeepWalk still outperforms when labeled data is sparse on both MacroF 1 ( T R ≤ 20%) and MicroF 1 ( T R ≤ 60%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.3 YouTube · p. 6
On YouTube, DeepWalk's MacroF1 shows a corresponding 10% increase over EdgeCluster.
“The MacroF 1 shows a corresponding 10% increase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.1 BlogCatalog · p. 6
On BlogCatalog, DeepWalk performs consistently better than EdgeCluster, Modularity, and wvRN.
“DeepWalk performs consistently better than EdgeCluster, Modularity, and wvRN.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.3 YouTube · p. 6
On YouTube, DeepWalk significantly outperforms the scalable baseline EdgeCluster.
“They show that DeepWalk significantly outperforms the scalable baseline for creating graph representations, EdgeCluster.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.2.1 Effect of Dimensionality · p. 8
The optimal dimensionality for a DeepWalk model depends on the number of training examples available.
“The performance is quite consistent between both Flickr and BlogCatalog and show that the optimal dimensionality for a model is dependent on the number of training examples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6.1.3 YouTube · p. 6
On YouTube, when 1% of the labeled nodes are used for test, DeepWalk's MicroF1 improves by 14% over EdgeCluster.
“When 1% of the labeled nodes are used for test, the MicroF 1 improves by 14%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations · p. 1
DeepWalk learns latent representations of vertices in a network by modeling a stream of short random walks.
“We develop an algorithm ( DeepWalk ) that learns social representations of a graph's vertices, by modeling a stream of short random walks.”
- Also stated in: § ABSTRACT · p. 1 · plain
“DeepWalk uses local information obtained from truncated random walks to learn latent representations by treating walks as the equivalent of sentences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § ABSTRACT · p. 1 · plain
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2 Connection: Power laws · p. 3
Techniques used to model natural language can be re-purposed to model community structure in networks.
“A core contribution of our work is the idea that techniques which have been used to model natural language (where the symbol frequency follows a power law distribution (or Zipf's law )) can be re-purposed to model community structure in networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations · p. 1
DeepWalk generalizes neural language models to process a special language composed of randomly-generated walks.
“DeepWalk generalizes neural language models to process a special language composed of a set of randomly-generated walks.”
- Also stated in: § ABSTRACT · p. 1 · plain
“DeepWalk generalizes recent advancements in language modeling and unsupervised feature learning (or deep learning ) from sequences of words to graphs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § ABSTRACT · p. 1 · plain
- Interpretationcitation§ DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations · p. 1
DeepWalk introduces deep learning as a tool to analyze graphs for the first time.
“In this paper we introduce deep learning (unsupervised feature learning) [2] techniques, which have proven successful in natural language processing, into network analysis for the first time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] [2] Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent. Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. 2013. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 2. PROBLEM DEFINITION · p. 2
The same representation can be used for multiple classification problems concerning that network.
“Moreover, the same representation can be used for multiple classification problems concerning that network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 2. PROBLEM DEFINITION · p. 2
The separation between structural representation and labeling task avoids cascading errors that can occur in iterative methods.
“This separation between the structural representation and the labeling task avoids cascading errors, which can occur in iterative methods [33].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] [33] J. Neville and D. Jensen. A bias/variance decomposition for models using collective inference. Machine Learning , 73(1):87-106, 2008. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2.2 Hierarchical Softmax · p. 4
Hierarchical Softmax reduces the computational complexity of calculating Pr(u_k | Φ(v_j)) from O(|V|) to O(log |V|).
“This reduces the computational complexity of calculating Pr( u k | Φ( v j )) from O ( | V | ) to O (log | V | ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations · p. 1
The latent representations encode social relations in a continuous vector space with a relatively small number of dimensions.
“These latent representations encode social relations in a continuous vector space with a relatively small number of dimensions.”
- Also stated in: § ABSTRACT · p. 1 · plain
“These latent representations encode social relations in a continuous vector space, which is easily exploited by statistical models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § ABSTRACT · p. 1 · plain
- Interpretationnone given§ 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
DeepWalk learns structural regularities present within short random walks.
“DeepWalk learns structural regularities present within short random walks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.1 Overview · p. 4
The algorithm does not require knowing the vocabulary or frequency distribution of vertices ahead of training.
“While it is beneficial to know the V and the frequency distribution of vertices in the random walks ahead of the training, it is not necessary for the algorithm to work as we will show in 4.2.2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.3 Parallelizability · p. 5
ASGD achieves an optimal rate of convergence when updates are sparse and no lock is acquired for shared model parameters.
“Given that our updates are sparse and we do not acquire a lock to access the model shared parameters, ASGD will achieve an optimal rate of convergence [36].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] [36] B. Recht, C. Re, S. Wright, and F. Niu. Hogwild: A lock-free approach to parallelizing stochastic gradient descent. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24 , pages 693-701. 2011. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 6.2.1 Effect of Dimensionality · p. 8
DeepWalk can make useful models of various sizes.
“These experiments show that our method can make useful models of various sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 6.1.2 Flickr · p. 6
DeepWalk can outperform the baselines on Flickr with 60% less training data.
“In other words, DeepWalk can outperform the baselines with 60% less training data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 6.2.2 Effect of sampling frequency · p. 8
DeepWalk is able to learn meaningful latent representations for vertices after only a small number of random walks.
“These results demonstrate that we are able to learn meaningful latent representations for vertices after only a small number of random walks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 6.1.3 YouTube · p. 6
DeepWalk performs exceedingly well in a sparsely labeled environment.
“DeepWalk , can scale to large graphs, and performs exceedingly well in such a sparsely labeled environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 6.1.3 YouTube · p. 6
The YouTube experiment showcases performance benefits that can occur from using social representation learning for multilabel classification.
“This experiment showcases the performance benefits that can occur from using social representation learning for multilabel classification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 7. RELATED WORK · p. 8
DeepWalk learns latent social representations instead of computing statistics related to centrality or partitioning.
“We learn our latent social representations, instead of computing statistics related to centrality [12] or partitioning [41].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] [12] B. Gallagher and T. Eliassi-Rad. Leveraging label-independent features for classification in sparsely labeled networks: An empirical study. In Advances in Social Network Mining and Analysis , pages 1-19. Springer, 2010. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [41] [41] L. Tang and H. Liu. Leveraging social media networks for classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 23(3):447-478, 2011. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 8. CONCLUSIONS · p. 9
As an online algorithm, DeepWalk is scalable.
“As an online algorithm, DeepWalk is also scalable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 8. CONCLUSIONS · p. 9
Experiments on a variety of different graphs illustrate the effectiveness of DeepWalk on challenging multi-label classification tasks.
“Experiments on a variety of different graphs illustrate the effectiveness of our approach on challenging multi-label classification tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 7. RELATED WORK · p. 8
DeepWalk applies unsupervised representation learning to graphs.
“Weapply unsupervised representation learning to graphs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 6.1.3 YouTube · p. 6
DeepWalk can scale to large graphs.
“DeepWalk , can scale to large graphs, and performs exceedingly well in such a sparsely labeled environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 6.1.1 BlogCatalog · p. 6
The strong performance of DeepWalk when only small fractions of the graph are labeled is a core strength of the approach.
“This strong performance when only small fractions of the graph are labeled is a core strength of our approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 8. CONCLUSIONS · p. 9
DeepWalk is a novel approach for learning latent social representations of vertices.
“We propose DeepWalk , a novel approach for learning latent social representations of vertices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 8. CONCLUSIONS · p. 9
On large graphs, DeepWalk significantly outperforms other methods designed to operate for sparsity.
“On such large graphs, our method significantly outperforms other methods designed to operate for sparsity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 8. CONCLUSIONS · p. 9
DeepWalk can create meaningful representations for graphs too large to run spectral methods on.
“Our results show that we can create meaningful representations for graphs too large to run spectral methods on.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 8. CONCLUSIONS · p. 9
Using local information from truncated random walks as input, DeepWalk learns a representation which encodes structural regularities.
“Using local information from truncated random walks as input, our method learns a representation which encodes structural regularities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
- May combine two claims. 11
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 4.2 Algorithm: DeepWalk · p. 4Random walks with restarts show no advantage over those without restarts in preliminary results.
“These walks could have restarts (i.e. a teleport probability of returning back to their root), but our preliminary results did not show any advantage of using restarts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ ABSTRACT · p. 1DeepWalk is scalable; it is an online learning algorithm that builds useful incremental results and is trivially parallelizable.
“DeepWalk is also scalable. It is an online learning algorithm which builds useful incremental results, and is trivially parallelizable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 6.1.2 Flickr · p. 6On Flickr, DeepWalk performs quite well in MacroF1, initially performing close to SpectralClustering, but distancing itself to a 1% improvement.
“It also performs quite well in MacroF 1 , initially performing close to SpectralClustering, but distancing itself to a 1% improvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 6.2.2 Effect of sampling frequency · p. 8Increasing γ has a big effect on results initially, but this effect quickly slows for γ > 10.
“Initially, increasing γ has a big effect in the results, but this effect quickly slows ( γ > 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.1 Datasets · p. 6BlogCatalog is a network of social relationships provided by blogger authors.
“BlogCatalog [39] is a network of social relationships provided by blogger authors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6The eigenvectors of the Modularity matrix encode information about modular graph partitions of G.
“The eigenvectors of B encode information about modular graph partitions of G [34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] [34] M. E. Newman. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 103(23):8577-8582, 2006. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 2DeepWalk's representations are general and can be combined with any classification method, including iterative inference methods.
“Our representations are general, and can be combined with any classification method (including iterative inference methods).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6EdgeCluster uses k-means clustering to cluster the adjacency matrix of G.
“EdgeCluster [40]: This method uses k -means clustering to cluster the adjacency matrix of G .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] [40] L. Tang and H. Liu. Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , pages 1107-1116. ACM, 2009. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6Modularity generates a representation in R^d from the top-d eigenvectors of the Modularity matrix of G.
“Modularity [39]: This method generates a representation in R d from the topd eigenvectors of B , the Modularity matrix of G .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6EdgeCluster has been shown to perform comparably to the Modularity method, with the added advantage of scaling to graphs which are too large for spectral decomposition.
“Its has been shown to perform comparably to the Modularity method, with the added advantage of scaling to graphs which are too large for spectral decomposition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] [40] L. Tang and H. Liu. Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , pages 1107-1116. ACM, 2009. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.1 Datasets · p. 6Flickr is a network of contacts between users of the photo sharing website.
“Flickr [39] is a network of the contacts between users of the photo sharing website.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ ABSTRACT · p. 1DeepWalk's representations are suitable for a broad class of real world applications such as network classification and anomaly detection.
“These qualities make it suitable for a broad class of real world applications such as network classification, and anomaly detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3 · p. 3Solving the optimization problem builds representations that capture shared similarities in local graph structure between vertices; vertices with similar neighborhoods acquire similar representations, allowing generalization.
“Solving the optimization problem from Eq. 2 builds representations that capture the shared similarities in local graph structure between vertices. Vertices which have similar neighborhoods will acquire similar representations (encoding cocitation similarity), and allowing generalization on machine learning tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. INTRODUCTION · p. 1DeepWalk's representation quality is not influenced by the choice of labeled vertices, so they can be shared among tasks.
“Our representation quality is not influenced by the choice of labeled vertices, so they can be shared among tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.1 Datasets · p. 6In Flickr, the labels represent the interest groups of the users.
“The labels represent the interest groups of the users such as ' black and white photos '.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6wvRN is a weighted-vote Relational Neighbor relational classifier.
“wvRN [24]: The weighted-vote Relational Neighbor is a relational classifier.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] [24] S. A. Macskassy and F. Provost. A simple relational classifier. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining (MRDM-2003) at KDD-2003 , pages 64-76, 2003. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.1 Datasets · p. 6YouTube is a social network between users of the popular video sharing website.
“YouTube [40] is a social network between users of the popular video sharing website.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] [40] L. Tang and H. Liu. Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , pages 1107-1116. ACM, 2009. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6SpectralClustering generates a representation in R^d from the d-smallest eigenvectors of the normalized graph Laplacian of G.
“SpectralClustering [41]: This method generates a representation in R d from the d -smallest eigenvectors of ˜ L , the normalized graph Laplacian of G .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] [41] L. Tang and H. Liu. Leveraging social media networks for classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 23(3):447-478, 2011. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.1 Datasets · p. 6In YouTube, the labels represent groups of viewers that enjoy common video genres.
“The labels here represent groups of viewers that enjoy common video genres (e.g. anime and wrestling ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] [40] L. Tang and H. Liu. Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , pages 1107-1116. ACM, 2009. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.1 Datasets · p. 6In BlogCatalog, the labels represent the topic categories provided by the authors.
“The labels represent the topic categories provided by the authors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 7.1 Relational Learning · p. 8Exact inference in the collective classification problem is NP-hard.
“Exact inference in the collective classification problem is NP-hard, and solutions have focused on the use of approximate inference algorithm which may not be guaranteed to converge [37].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] [37] P. Sen, G. Namata, M. Bilgic, L. Getoor, B. Galligher, and T. Eliassi-Rad. Collective classification in network data. AI magazine , 29(3):93, 2008. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6wvRN estimates Pr(y_i|N_i) with the appropriately normalized weighted mean of its neighbors.
“Given the neighborhood N i of vertex v i , wvRN estimates Pr( y i |N i ) with the (appropriately normalized) weighted mean of its neighbors”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] [24] S. A. Macskassy and F. Provost. A simple relational classifier. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining (MRDM-2003) at KDD-2003 , pages 64-76, 2003. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 7.1 Relational Learning · p. 9Graph Kernels are quite slow unless approximated.
“Graph Kernels [42] have been proposed as a way to use relational data as part of the classification process, but are quite slow unless approximated [19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] [19] U. Kang, H. Tong, and J. Sun. Fast random walk graph kernel. In SDM , pages 828-838, 2012. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 7. RELATED WORK · p. 8DeepWalk is a scalable online method which uses only local information.
“We propose a scalable online method which uses only local information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 7.1 Relational Learning · p. 8Solutions to collective classification have focused on approximate inference algorithms which may not be guaranteed to converge.
“Exact inference in the collective classification problem is NP-hard, and solutions have focused on the use of approximate inference algorithm which may not be guaranteed to converge [37].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] [37] P. Sen, G. Namata, M. Bilgic, L. Getoor, B. Galligher, and T. Eliassi-Rad. Collective classification in network data. AI magazine , 29(3):93, 2008. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 7. RELATED WORK · p. 8Most methods require global information and are offline.
“Most methods require global information and are offline [16,39-41].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [16] [16] K. Henderson, B. Gallagher, L. Li, L. Akoglu, T. Eliassi-Rad, H. Tong, and C. Faloutsos. It's who you know: Graph mining using recursive structural features. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '11, pages 663-671, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] [39] L. Tang and H. Liu. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , KDD '09, pages 817-826, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] [40] L. Tang and H. Liu. Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , pages 1107-1116. ACM, 2009. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] [41] L. Tang and H. Liu. Leveraging social media networks for classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 23(3):447-478, 2011. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 7.2 Unsupervised Feature Learning · p. 9Distributed representations have been proposed to model structural relationship between concepts.
“Distributed representations have been proposed to model structural relationship between concepts [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] [17] G. E. Hinton. Learning distributed representations of concepts. In Proceedings of the eighth annual conference of the cognitive science society , pages 1-12. Amherst, MA, 1986. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 7.2 Unsupervised Feature Learning · p. 9Neural networks have made advancements in computer vision, speech recognition, and natural language processing.
“these networks have made advancements in diverse fields such as computer vision [21], speech recognition [7], and natural language processing [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [21] [21] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In NIPS , volume 1, page 4, 2012. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [7] [7] G. E. Dahl, D. Yu, L. Deng, and A. Acero. Context-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition. Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on , 20(1):30-42, 2012. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] [6] R. Collobert and J. Weston. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning , pages 160-167. ACM, 2008. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Baseline Methods · p. 6wvRN has shown surprisingly good performance in real networks, and has been advocated as a sensible relational classification baseline.
“It has shown surprisingly good performance in real networks, and has been advocated as a sensible relational classification baseline [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] [25] S. A. Macskassy and F. Provost. Classification in networked data: A toolkit and a univariate case study. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 8:935-983, 2007. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 8. CONCLUSIONS · p. 9DeepWalk is parallelizable, allowing workers to update different parts of the model concurrently.
“We also show that our approach is parallelizable, allowing workers to update different parts of the model concurrently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
In relational classification, links between feature vectors violate the traditional i.i.d. assumption.
“In the relational classification problem, the links between feature vectors violate the traditional i.i.d. assumption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The social networks to which DeepWalk is applied have degree distributions that follow a power law (are scale-free).
“If the degree distribution of a connected graph follows a power law (is scale-free ), we observe that the frequency which vertices appear in the short random walks will also follow a power-law distribution.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Network embedding contains non-deep learning methods such as matrix factorization and random walks.
“On the other hand, network embedding contains other non-deep learning methods such as matrix factorization [33], [34] and random walks [35].”
From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [35]
Graph embedding methods like node2vec and DeepWalk cannot be applied to the Pinterest setting.
“graph embedding methods like node2vec [17] and DeepWalk [26] cannot be applied here.”
From Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systems (2018) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
YouTube section calls the 1% sample test data
MinorThe experimental procedure says the sampled labeled nodes are used for training and the remainder for testing, whereas the YouTube section calls the 1% sample test data.
“When 1% of the labeled nodes are used for test, the MicroF 1 improves by 14%.”
“Specifically, we randomly sample a portion ( T R ) of the labeled nodes, and use them as training data. The rest of the nodes are used as test.”
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568 · see citing works
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533 · see citing works
Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.
Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596 · Cited by 17,949 · see citing works
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001 · see citing works
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256 · see citing works
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687 · see citing works
LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification
Fan, R.-E., Chang, K., Hsieh, C., Xiang-rui, W., & Lin, C. (2008) · doi:10.5555/1390681.1442794 · Cited by 6,680 · see citing works
A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning
Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390177 · Cited by 5,058 · see citing works
An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups
Zachary, W. W. (1977) · Journal of Anthropological Research · doi:10.1086/jar.33.4.3629752 · Cited by 4,709 · see citing works
Collective Classification in Network Data
Sen, P., Namata, G., Bilgic, M., Getoor, L., Gallagher, B., & Eliassi‐Rad, T. (2008) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v29i3.2157 · Cited by 3,293 · see citing works
Context-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition
Dahl, G. E., Yu, D., Deng, L., & Acero, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2011.2134090 · Cited by 3,011 · see citing works
A neural probabilistic language model
BengioYoshua, DucharmeRéjean, VincentPascal, & JanvinChristian (2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944966 · Cited by 2,646 · see citing works
Why Does Unsupervised Pre-training Help Deep Learning?
Erhan, D., Bengio, Y., Courville, A. C., Manzagol, P.-A., Vincent, P., & Bengio, S. (2010) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.5555/1756006.1756025 · Cited by 2,579 · see citing works
Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning
(2007) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7432.001.0001 · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
Fouss, F., Pirotte, A., Renders, J.-M., & Saerens, M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2007.46 · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
Hogwild: A Lock-Free Approach to Parallelizing Stochastic Gradient Descent
Niu, F., Recht, B., Re, C., & Wright, S. J. (2011) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1106.5730 · Cited by 1,211 · see citing works
Local Graph Partitioning using PageRank Vectors
Andersen, R., Chung, F., & Lang, K. (2006) · 2006 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'06) · doi:10.1109/focs.2006.44 · Cited by 967 · see citing works
On the Foundations of Relaxation Labeling Processes
Hummel, R. A., & Zucker, S. W. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1983.4767390 · Cited by 885 · see citing works
A Scalable Hierarchical Distributed Language Model
Mnih, A., & Hinton, G. E. (2008) · Cited by 843 · see citing works
(2005) · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Learning distributed representations of concepts.
Hinton, G. E. (1989) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 815 · see citing works
Spielman, D. A., & Teng, S. (2004) · ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) · doi:10.1145/1007352.1007372 · Cited by 803 · see citing works
Relational learning via latent social dimensions
Tang, L., & Liu, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1557019.1557109 · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Diffusion Kernels on Graphs and Other Discrete Input Spaces
Kondor, R., & Lafferty, J. (2002) · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Classification in Networked Data: A Toolkit and a Univariate Case Study
(2007) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1248659.1248693 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Leveraging social media networks for classification
Tang, L., & Liu, H. (2011) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-010-0210-x · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Polyglot: Distributed Word Representations for Multilingual NLPPreprint
Al‐Rfou, R., Perozzi, B., & Skiena, S. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1307.1662 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Self-citationA Simple Relational Classifier
Macskassy, S. A., & Provost, F. (2003) · doi:10.21236/ada452802 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions
Tang, L., & Liu, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management · doi:10.1145/1645953.1646094 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
It's who you know: graph mining using recursive structural features
Henderson, K., Gallagher, B., Li, L., Akoglu, L., Eliassi-Rad, T., Tong, H., & Faloutsos, C. (2011) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2020408.2020512 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Using ghost edges for classification in sparsely labeled networks
Gallagher, B. J., Tong, H., Eliassi‐Rad, T., & Faloutsos, C. (2008) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/1401890.1401925 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Kang, U., Tong, H., & Sun, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972825.71 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Leveraging relational autocorrelation with latent group models
Neville, J., & Jensen, D. (2005) · Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Multi-relational mining - MRDM '05 · doi:10.1145/1090193.1090201 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Semi-Supervised Classification of Network Data Using Very Few Labels
Lin, F., & Cohen, W. W. (2010) · 2010 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1109/asonam.2010.19 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Multi-label relational neighbor classification using social context features
Wang, X., & Sukthankar, G. (2013) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487610 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
A bias/variance decomposition for models using collective inference
Neville, J., & Jensen, D. (2008) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-008-5066-6 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- L. Bottou . Stochastic gradient learning in neural networks . In Proceedings of Neuro-Nîmes 91 , Nimes, France , 1991 . EC2. L. Bottou. Stochastic gradient learning in neural networks. In Proceedings of Neuro-Nîmes 91, Nimes, France, 1991. EC2.
- J. Dean , G. Corrado , R. Monga , K. Chen , M. Devin , Q. Le , M. Mao , M. Ranzato , A. Senior , P. Tucker , K. Yang , and A. Ng . Large scale distributed deep networks. In P. Bartlett, F. Pereira, C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Weinberger, editors , Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 , pages 1232 -- 1240 . 2012 . J. Dean, G. Corrado, R. Monga, K. Chen, M. Devin, Q. Le, M. Mao, M. Ranzato, A. Senior, P. Tucker, K. Yang, and A. Ng. Large scale distributed deep networks. In P. Bartlett, F. Pereira, C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25, pages 1232--1240. 2012.
- 10.5555/1883692.1883693 · DOI
- 10.1002/asi.v58:7 · DOI
- T. Mikolov , W.-t. Yih , and G. Zweig . Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations . In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT , pages 746 -- 751 , 2013 . T. Mikolov, W.-t. Yih, and G. Zweig. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 746--751, 2013.
- J. Neville and D. Jensen . Iterative classification in relational data . In Proc. AAAI-2000 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data , pages 13 -- 20 , 2000 . J. Neville and D. Jensen. Iterative classification in relational data. In Proc. AAAI-2000 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data, pages 13--20, 2000.
- S. Vishwanathan , N. N. Schraudolph , R. Kondor , and K. M. Borgwardt . Graph kernels . The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 99 : 1201 -- 1242 , 2010 . S. Vishwanathan, N. N. Schraudolph, R. Kondor, and K. M. Borgwardt. Graph kernels. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 99:1201--1242, 2010.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.10903 · Cited by 12,107
node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks
Grover, A., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939754 · Cited by 10,926 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., & Yu, P. S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.2978386 · Cited by 11,000 · see citing works
Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications
Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Li, C., & Sun, M. (2020) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.01.001 · Cited by 6,880 · see citing works
LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embedding
Tang, J., Qu, M., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Yan, J., & Mei, Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741093 · Cited by 5,416 · see citing works
Geometric Deep Learning: Going beyond Euclidean data
Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., LeCun, Y., Szlam, A., & Vandergheynst, P. (2017) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2693418 · Cited by 3,661 · see citing works
Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network
Wang, X., Ji, H., Shi, C., Wang, B., Ye, Y., Cui, P., & Yu, P. S. (2019) · The World Wide Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313562 · Cited by 3,191 · see citing works
Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systems
Ying, R., He, R., Chen, K., Eksombatchai, P., Hamilton, W. L., & Leskovec, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3219890 · Cited by 3,733 · see citing works
Structural Deep Network Embedding
Wang, D., Cui, P., & Zhu, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939753 · Cited by 2,845 · see citing works
Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications
Wang, Q., Mao, Z., Wang, B., & Guo, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2754499 · Cited by 2,654 · see citing works
A survey on semi-supervised learning
van Engelen, J. E., & Hoos, H. H. (2020) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6 · Cited by 2,666 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey of Graph Embedding: Problems, Techniques, and Applications
Cai, H., Zheng, V. W., & Chang, K. C.-C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2807452 · Cited by 2,034 · see citing works
Graph convolutional networks: a comprehensive review
Zhang, S., Tong, H., Xu, J., & Maciejewski, R. (2019) · Computational Social Networks · doi:10.1186/s40649-019-0069-y · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey
Goyal, P., & Ferrara, E. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.022 · Cited by 1,801 · see citing works
Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks
Zitnik, M., Agrawal, M., & Leskovec, J. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty294 · Cited by 1,501 · see citing works
Cui, P., Wang, X., Pei, J., & Zhu, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2849727 · Cited by 1,274 · see citing works
Deep learning modelling techniques: Current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges
Ahmed, S. F., Alam, M. S. B., Hassan, M., Rozbu, M. R., Ishtiak, T., Rafa, N., Mofijur, M., Shawkat Ali, A. B. M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8 · Cited by 1,079 · see citing works
Adversarially Regularized Graph Autoencoder for Graph Embedding
Pan, S., Hu, R., Long, G., Jiang, J., Yao, L., & Zhang, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/362 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
Image Generation from Scene Graphs
Johnson, J., Gupta, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00133 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
Fadlullah, Z. M., Tang, F., Mao, B., Kato, N., Akashi, O., Inoue, T., & Mizutani, K. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2707140 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Network Representation Learning: A Survey
Zhang, D., Yin, J., Zhu, X., & Zhang, C. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2018.2850013 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Poincaré Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representations
Nickel, M., & Kiela, D. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.08039 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
GRAM: Graph-based Attention Model for Healthcare Representation Learning
Choi, E., Bahadori, M. T., Song, L., Stewart, W. F., & Sun, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098126 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Traffic Flow Prediction via Spatial Temporal Graph Neural Network
Wang, X., Ma, Y., Wang, Y., Jin, W., Wang, X., Tang, J., Jia, C., & Yu, J. (2020) · Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020 · doi:10.1145/3366423.3380186 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
DeepInf: Social Influence Prediction with Deep Learning
Qiu, J., Tang, J., Ma, H., Dong, Y., Wang, K., & Tang, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220077 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Large-Scale Learnable Graph Convolutional Networks
Gao, H., Wang, Z., & Ji, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3219947 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
BioWordVec, improving biomedical word embeddings with subword information and MeSH
Zhang, Y., Chen, Q., Yang, Z., Lin, H., & Lu, Z. (2019) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0055-0 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Dual Graph Convolutional Networks for Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Classification
Zhuang, C., & Ma, Q. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186116 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Wan, F., Hong, L., Xiao, A., Jiang, T., & Zeng, J. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty543 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Brave New World? On AI and the Management of Customer Relationships
Libai, B., Bart, Y., Gensler, S., Hofacker, C. F., Kaplan, A., Kötterheinrich, K., & Kroll, E. B. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2020.04.002 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
GeniePath: Graph Neural Networks with Adaptive Receptive Paths
Liu, Z., Chen, C., Li, L., Zhou, J., Li, X., Song, L., & Qi, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33014424 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Utilizing graph machine learning within drug discovery and development
Gaudelet, T., Day, B., Jamasb, A. R., Soman, J., Regep, C., Liu, G., Hayter, J. B. R., Vickers, R., Roberts, C., Tang, J., et al. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab159 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Random Walks: A Review of Algorithms and Applications
Xia, F., Liu, J., Nie, H., Fu, Y., Wan, L., & Kong, X. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2019.2952908 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare
Li, M. M., Huang, K., & Zitnik, M. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00942-x · Cited by 294 · see citing works
“55 ).”
Toward better drug discovery with knowledge graph
Zeng, X., Tu, X., Liu, Y., Fu, X., & Su, Y. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2021.09.003 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
KAME: Knowledge-based Attention Model for Diagnosis Prediction in Healthcare
Ma, F., You, Q., Xiao, H., Chitta, R., Zhou, J., & Gao, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3269206.3271701 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Learning Deep Network Representations with Adversarially Regularized Autoencoders
Yu, W., Zheng, C., Cheng, W., Aggarwal, C. C., Song, D., Zong, B., Chen, H., & Wang, W. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220000 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Deep Recursive Network Embedding with Regular Equivalence
Tu, K., Cui, P., Wang, X., Yu, P. S., & Zhu, W. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220068 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Hierarchical Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-supervised Node Classification
Hu, F., Zhu, Y., Wu, S., Wang, L., & Tan, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/630 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
SkipGNN: predicting molecular interactions with skip-graph networks
Huang, K., Xiao, C., Glass, L. M., Zitnik, M., & Sun, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77766-9 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The Future of False Information Detection on Social Media: New Perspectives and Trends
Guo, B., Ding, Y., Yao, L., Liang, Y., & Yu, Z. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3393880 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
DeepAID: Interpreting and Improving Deep Learning-based Anomaly Detection in Security Applications
Han, D., Wang, Z., Chen, W., Zhong, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, H., Yang, J., Shi, X., & Yin, X. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3460120.3484589 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
A Survey on Differentially Private Machine Learning [Review Article]
Gong, M., Xie, Y., Pan, K., Feng, K., & Qin, A. K. (2020) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2020.2976185 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Binarized attributed network embedding
Yang, H., Pan, S., Zhang, P., Chen, L., Lian, D., & Zhang, C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) · doi:10.1109/icdm.2018.8626170 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Disease Prediction via Graph Neural Networks
Sun, Z., Yin, H., Chen, H., Chen, T., Cui, L., & Yang, F. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2020.3004143 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Adversarial Label-Flipping Attack and Defense for Graph Neural Networks
Zhang, M., Hu, L., Shi, C., & Wang, X. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) · doi:10.1109/icdm50108.2020.00088 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
DTi2Vec: Drug–target interaction prediction using network embedding and ensemble learning
Thafar, M. A., Olayan, R. S., Albaradei, S., Bajic, V. B., Gojobori, T., Essack, M., & Gao, X. (2021) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-021-00552-w · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Li, H., Sun, Y., Hong, H., Huang, X., Tao, H., Huang, Q., Wang, L., Xu, K., Gan, J., Chen, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00469-5 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Combating Crowdsourced Review Manipulators: A Neighborhood-Based Approach
Kaghazgaran, P., Caverlee, J., & Squicciarini, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3159652.3159726 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Shen, X., Pan, S., Liu, W., Ong, Y.-S., & Sun, Q.-S. (2018) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/493 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Graph representation learning for single-cell biology
Hetzel, L., Fischer, D. S., Günnemann, S., & Theis, F. J. (2021) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2021.05.008 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
HeteroMed: Heterogeneous Information Network for Medical Diagnosis
Hosseini, A., Chen, T., Wu, W., Sun, Y., & Sarrafzadeh, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3269206.3271805 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Reinforced Structured State-Evolution for Vision-Language Navigation
Chen, J., Gao, C., Meng, E., Zhang, Q., & Liu, S. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01501 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Motif-Backdoor: Rethinking the Backdoor Attack on Graph Neural Networks via Motifs
Zheng, H., Xiong, H., Chen, J., Ma, H., & Huang, G. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3267094 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
RareBench: Can LLMs Serve as Rare Diseases Specialists?
Chen, X., Mao, X., Guo, Q., Wang, L., Zhang, S., & Chen, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671576 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Harmonized representation learning on dynamic EHR graphs
Lee, D., Jiang, X., & Yu, H. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103426 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Co-embedding of edges and nodes with deep graph convolutional neural networks
Zhou, Y., Huo, H., Hou, Z., Bu, L., Mao, J., Wang, Y., Lv, X., & Bu, F. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-44224-1 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Wang, T., Peng, Q., Liu, B., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00418 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
PICO entity extraction for preclinical animal literature.
Wang, Q., Liao, J., Lapata, M., & Macleod, M. (2022) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-022-02074-4 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Formatting biological big data for modern machine learning in drug discovery
Duran‐Frigola, M., Fernández‐Torras, A., Bertoni, M., & Aloy, P. (2019) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1408 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Aceso: PICO-Guided Evidence Summarization on Medical Literature.
Zhang, X., Geng, P., Zhang, T., Lu, Q., Gao, P., & Mei, J. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2020.2984704 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Yao, H., Guan, J., & Liu, T. (2020) · Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219720020400107 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Fraud De-Anonymization for Fun and Profit
Hernandez, N., Rahman, M., Recabarren, R., & Carbunar, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3243734.3243770 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Search Rank Fraud De-Anonymization in Online Systems
Rahman, M., Hernandez, N., Carbunar, B., & Chau, D. H. (2018) · Proceedings of the 29th on Hypertext and Social Media · doi:10.1145/3209542.3209555 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Pinhanez, C. S., Candello, H., Cavalin, P., Pichiliani, M. C., Appel, A. P., Alves Ribeiro, V. H., Nogima, J., de Bayser, M., Guerra, M., Ferreira, H., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445368 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A comprehensive benchmark and empirical study of trace anomaly detection
Sun, Y., Shao, M., Nie, X., Yang, K., Li, X., Hao, B., Zhang, S., Pei, C., He, D., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2025.3622122 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Skiena, S.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-08-24
- Pages
- 701-710
- OpenAlex
- W2154851992
- Semantic Scholar
- fff114cbba4f3ba900f33da574283e3de7f26c83
- Cited by
- 10,123
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 412 · 2025: 873 · 2024: 1086 · 2023: 1219 · 2022: 1276 · 2021: 1620 · 2020: 1398 · 2019: 1166 · 2018: 661 · 2017: 281 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 80.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Google (Faculty Research Award)
- Division of Information and Intelligent Systems (DBI-1060572 and IIS-1017181)
- Division of Biological Infrastructure (DBI-1060572 and IIS-1017181)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- DeepWalk, graph embedding, social networks, random walks, unsupervised feature learning, graph representation learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review