The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
XSimGCL: Towards Extremely Simple Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation
Open accessAbstract
Contrastive learning (CL) has recently been demonstrated critical in improving recommendation performance. The underlying principle of CL-based recommendation models is to ensure the consistency between representations derived from different graph augmentations of the user-item bipartite graph. This self-supervised approach allows for the extraction of general features from raw data, thereby mitigating the issue of data sparsity. Despite the effectiveness of this paradigm, the factors contributing to its performance gains have yet to be fully understood. This paper provides novel insights into the impact of CL on recommendation. Our findings indicate that CL enables the model to learn more evenly distributed user and item representations, which alleviates the prevalent popularity bias and promoting long-tail items. Our analysis also suggests that the graph augmentations, previously considered essential, are relatively unreliable and of limited significance in CL-based recommendation. Based on these findings, we put forward an eXtremelySimpleGraphContrastiveLearning method (XSimGCL) for recommendation, which discards the ineffective graph augmentations and instead employs a simple yet effective noise-based embedding augmentation to generate views for CL. A comprehensive experimental study on four large and highly sparse benchmark datasets demonstrates that, though the proposed method is extremely simple, it can smoothly adjust the uniformity of learned representations and outperforms its graph augmentation-based counterparts by a large margin in both recommendation accuracy and training efficiency. The code and used datasets are released athttps://github.com/Coder-Yu/SELFRec.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00975 · Cited by 13,347
Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples
Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6572 · Cited by 10,381
Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Oord, A. V. D., Li, Y., & Vinyals, O. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.03748 · Cited by 6,242 · cited 3×
“The InfoNCE loss [22] is formulated as: where i and j are users/items in B , z i and z i are L 2 normalized representations learned from two different dropout-based graph augmentations (namely z i = e (cid:4) i e (cid:4) i (cid:5) 2 ), and τ > 0 (e.g., 0.2) is the temperature which controls the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendation
He, X., Deng, K., Wang, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wang, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3397271.3401063 · Cited by 4,430
Bootstrap Your Own Latent: A New Approach to Self-Supervised Learning
Grill, J.-B., Strub, F., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Richemond, P. H., Buchatskaya, E., Doersch, C., Pires, B. A., Guo, Z. D., Azar, M. G., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07733 · Cited by 3,846
Neural Graph Collaborative Filtering
Wang, X., He, X., Wang, M., Feng, F., & Chua, T.-S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3331184.3331267 · Cited by 3,823
SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings
Gao, T., Yao, X., & Chen, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.552 · Cited by 2,851
Kernel density estimation via diffusion
Botev, Z. I., Grotowski, J. F., & Kroese, D. P. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/10-aos799 · Cited by 1,689
Session-Based Recommendation with Graph Neural Networks
Wu, S., Tang, Y., Zhu, Y., Wang, L., Xie, X., & Tan, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301346 · Cited by 1,532
Cited by
Self-supervised learning for recommender systems: A survey
Yu, J., Yin, H., Xia, X., Chen, T., Li, J., & Huang, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3282907 · Cited by 413
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, J., Xia, X., Chen, T., Cui, L., Hung, N. Q. V., & Yin, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2191
- 2326-3865
- OpenAlex
- W4381786098
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 75.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: XSimGCL: Towards Extremely Simple Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2023.3288135
- The paper
- Yu, J., Xia, X., Chen, T., Cui, L., Hung, N. Q. V., & Yin, H. (2023). XSimGCL: Towards Extremely Simple Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2023.3288135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.