Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

XSimGCL: Towards Extremely Simple Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation

Open access
Yu, Junliang, Xia, Xin, Chen, Tong, Cui, Lizhen, Hung, Nguyen Quoc Viet, Yin, Hongzhi·2023·IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Abstract

Contrastive learning (CL) has recently been demonstrated critical in improving recommendation performance. The underlying principle of CL-based recommendation models is to ensure the consistency between representations derived from different graph augmentations of the user-item bipartite graph. This self-supervised approach allows for the extraction of general features from raw data, thereby mitigating the issue of data sparsity. Despite the effectiveness of this paradigm, the factors contributing to its performance gains have yet to be fully understood. This paper provides novel insights into the impact of CL on recommendation. Our findings indicate that CL enables the model to learn more evenly distributed user and item representations, which alleviates the prevalent popularity bias and promoting long-tail items. Our analysis also suggests that the graph augmentations, previously considered essential, are relatively unreliable and of limited significance in CL-based recommendation. Based on these findings, we put forward an eXtremelySimpleGraphContrastiveLearning method (XSimGCL) for recommendation, which discards the ineffective graph augmentations and instead employs a simple yet effective noise-based embedding augmentation to generate views for CL. A comprehensive experimental study on four large and highly sparse benchmark datasets demonstrates that, though the proposed method is extremely simple, it can smoothly adjust the uniformity of learned representations and outperforms its graph augmentation-based counterparts by a large margin in both recommendation accuracy and training efficiency. The code and used datasets are released athttps://github.com/Coder-Yu/SELFRec.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tkde.2023.3288135

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Yu, J., Xia, X., Chen, T., Cui, L., Hung, N. Q. V., & Yin, H.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Published
2023
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2191
  • 2326-3865
OpenAlex
W4381786098
Cited by
322
References
54
FWCI
75.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: XSimGCL: Towards Extremely Simple Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2023.3288135
The paper
Yu, J., Xia, X., Chen, T., Cui, L., Hung, N. Q. V., & Yin, H. (2023). XSimGCL: Towards Extremely Simple Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2023.3288135

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.