Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Open accessAbstract
While supervised learning has enabled great progress in many applications, unsupervised learning has not seen such widespread adoption, and remains an important and challenging endeavor for artificial intelligence. In this work, we propose a universal unsupervised learning approach to extract useful representations from high-dimensional data, which we call Contrastive Predictive Coding. The key insight of our model is to learn such representations by predicting the future in latent space by using powerful autoregressive models. We use a probabilistic contrastive loss which induces the latent space to capture information that is maximally useful to predict future samples. It also makes the model tractable by using negative sampling. While most prior work has focused on evaluating representations for a particular modality, we demonstrate that our approach is able to learn useful representations achieving strong performance on four distinct domains: speech, images, text and reinforcement learning in 3D environments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In CPC, predicting one or two timesteps in the future is too easy and results in poor performance, whereas predicting multiple timesteps leads to very effective representations.
“For example, Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) [80,143] utilizes a contrastive future prediction task, and it was found that predicting one or two timesteps in the future is (too) easy and results in poor performance, whereas predicting multiple timesteps into the future is much more complex, and leads to very effective representations.”
From Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task (2025) · cites this paper as [143]
Section 2.1 (p. 2) says that predicting farther into the future requires inferring more global structure, and the Introduction (p. 2) says CPC predicts many steps ahead and learns useful representations. But the paper does not report that predicting specifically one or two timesteps is too easy or results in poor performance; its Audio section (p. 5) says the prediction objective is 'neither trivial nor impossible.' (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSelf-supervised networks using contrastive loss learn to make representations similar for positive pairs and dissimilar for negative pairs, clustering similar samples together and pushing apart dissimilar samples.
“Using this contrastive loss, self-supervised networks learn to make the representations similar for positive pairs, and dissimilar for negative pairs, and hence are able to cluster similar (or positive) samples together and push apart dissimilar (or negative) samples.”
From Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning (2024) · cites this paper as Oord et al. 2018
Section 2.3 (p. 3) says CPC uses a contrastive loss to distinguish a positive future sample from negative samples, supporting the positive-versus-negative part of the claim. Section 2.4 (p. 4) describes earlier contrastive methods that bring related embeddings closer and separate others. The paper does not establish that CPC clusters generally similar samples together or pushes generally dissimilar samples apart; its positive and negative samples are defined by their relationship to a prediction context. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInfoNCE loss maximizes the agreement of two different augmented sequences' representations from the same sequence while minimizing the agreement with other negative sequences.
“It means that InfoNCE loss maximizes the agreement of two different augmented sequences' representations from the same sequence while minimizing the agreement with other negative sequences.”
From Contrastive Learning from Extremely Augmented Skeleton Sequences for Self-Supervised Action Recognition (2022) · cites this paper as Oord, Li, and Vinyals 2018
Section 2.3 (p. 3) describes InfoNCE as distinguishing a positive sample from negative samples, supporting the contrastive part of the claim. But the paper's positive pair is a future target and its preceding context, not representations of two augmented sequences derived from the same sequence; that specific characterization is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) framework captures the long-term temporal structure of sensor data streams.
“We introduce the Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) framework to human activity recognition, which captures the long-term temporal structure of sensor data streams.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Section 2.4 (p. 4) says CPC extracts features that retain information across long time horizons, supporting the temporal-structure part of the claim. The paper tests audio, images, language, and reinforcement learning (Conclusion, p. 9), but does not establish that CPC captures long-term structure in the sensor data streams used for human activity recognition. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEither c_t or z_t can be utilized as the representation.
“As mentioned in [58], either 𝑐 𝑡 (the output of 𝑔 𝑒𝑛𝑐 ) or 𝑧 𝑡 (the output of 𝑔 𝑎𝑟 ) can be utilized as the representation.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Section 2.2 (p. 3) explicitly says either z_t or c_t can be used as a representation for downstream tasks. But the citing sentence reverses their origins: the paper defines z_t as the output of g_enc and c_t as the output of g_ar. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The framework for data augmentation and batch formation plays a critical role in multi-view similarity learning.
“The framework for data augmentation and batch formation plays a critical role in multi-view similarity learning [12,16,44,115], where we start by following the popular SimCLR [16] method.”
From MARs: Multi-view Attention Regularizations for Patch-based Feature Recognition of Space Terrain (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
The Vision section (p. 6) says data augmentation helped CPC image training, and the Audio section (pp. 5–6) compares how different choices of negative samples from minibatches affected phone-classification accuracy. These findings support the importance of augmentation and sample selection in CPC, but the paper does not establish the broader claim about a data-augmentation and batch-formation framework for multi-view similarity learning. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe described contrastive learner setting is common for self-supervised contrastive learners with NCE objectives, including SimCLR and SimCSE.
“We note that this is a common setting for self-supervised contrastive learners with NCE objectives (Gutmann & Hyvärinen, 2010;Oord et al., 2018), including SimCLR (Chen et al., 2020) and SimCSE (Gao et al., 2021).”
From The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (2024) · cites this paper as Oord et al., 2018
Predicting just the next future timestep involves exploiting the local smoothness of the signal, whereas predicting multiple subsequent timesteps requires inferring the global structure of time-series data.
“The key insight behind this approach is that predicting just the next future timestep involves exploiting the local smoothness of the signal, whereas predicting multiple subsequent timesteps requires inferring the global structure of time-series data.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Haresamudram et al. adapted Contrastive Predictive Coding for human activity recognition, emphasizing the importance of temporal structure in sensor data representation.
“Haresamudram et al. [80] adapted Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC [143]) for HAR, emphasizing the importance of temporal structure in sensor data representation.”
From Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task (2025) · cites this paper as [143]
Contrastive predictive coding (CPC) provides a contrastive learning framework to perform the prediction task using InfoNCE loss.
“Contrastive predictive coding (CPC) proposed by [109] provides a contrastive learning framework to perform the prediction task using InfoNCE loss.”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
CPC does not directly predict future observations x_{t+k}; instead, it tries to preserve the mutual information of c_t and x_{t+k}.
“It can be seen that CPC does not directly predict future observations x t + k . Instead, it tries to preserve the mutual information of c t and x t + k .”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
The contrastive loss (InfoNCE) is minimised when the similarity is high for positive pairs and low for negative pairs.
“This contrastive loss, or InfoNCE loss (Oord et al. 2018), is minimised when the similarity is high for positive pairs and low for negative pairs.”
From Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning (2024) · cites this paper as Oord et al. 2018
The authors follow the standard linear benchmarking evaluation scheme, training a linear classifier (single MLP layer) on top of a frozen self-supervised pretrained encoder.
“To evaluate the performance of our TS-TCC model, we follow the standard linear benchmarking evaluation scheme [Oord et al. , 2018; Chen et al. , 2020]. Particularly, we train a linear classifier (single MLP layer) on top of a frozen self-supervised pretrained encoder model.”
From Time-Series Representation Learning via Temporal and Contextual Contrasting (2021) · cites this paper as Oord et al. , 2018
Contrastive-based methods usually use a contrastive similarity metric, such as InfoNCE loss.
“Contrastive-based methods usually use a contrastive similarity metric, such as InfoNCE loss [109].”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
CPC representations encode the high-level information between temporally separated parts of the time-series signal.
“This results in representations that encode the high-level information between temporally separated parts of the time-series signal [58], thereby leading to improved downstream recognition performance.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) performs contrastive learning over multiple future timestep predictions.
“Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) [58], which is the focus of this work, performs contrastive learning over multiple future timestep predictions.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Contrastive learning has resulted in excellent representation learning performance across domains such as computer vision, natural language, speech recognition, and time-series data.
“This framework has resulted in excellent representation learning performance across domains such as computer vision [12, 33, 35], natural language [49], speech recognition [6, 58] and time-series data [39].”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
If extra context from the past is useful for classification, then c_t can be used; else z_t may be more effective.
“If extra context from the past is useful for classification, then 𝑐 𝑡 can be used; else 𝑧 𝑡 may be more effective.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
SimCLR aims to maximize the learned representation similarity between augmented views of the same input.
“SimCLR aims to maximize the learned representation similarity between augmented views of the same input.”
From MARs: Multi-view Attention Regularizations for Patch-based Feature Recognition of Space Terrain (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
The Abstract (p. 1) describes Contrastive Predictive Coding, and Related Work (p. 4) discusses a different multi-view contrastive method. Searches for SimCLR and augmented views found no passage in our copy that describes SimCLR’s objective. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More recent advancements in autoregressive modeling such as masked convolutional architectures [18, 19] or self-attention networks [20] could help improve results further.”
BackgroundImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These techniques made manually specified features largely redundant and have greatly improved state-of-the-art in several real-world applications [1, 2, 3].”
MethodAdam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We use the Adam optimizer [32] with a learning rate of 2e-4, and use 8 GPUs each with a minibatch of 8 examples from which the negative samples in the contrastive loss are drawn.”
MethodImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In our visual representation experiments we use the ILSVRC ImageNet competition dataset [34].”
MethodBatch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We did not use Batch-Norm [38].”
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In Word2Vec [9] neighbouring words are predicted using a contrastive loss.”
BackgroundLearning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545 · see citing works
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These techniques made manually specified features largely redundant and have greatly improved state-of-the-art in several real-world applications [1, 2, 3].”
BackgroundSelf-citationFaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering
Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., & Philbin, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298682 · Cited by 15,267 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, the techniques proposed by [21, 22, 23] were based on triplet losses using a max-margin approach to separate positive from negative examples.”
MethodLayer NormalizationPreprint
Ba, J., Kiros, J., & Hinton, G. E. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06450 · Cited by 13,745 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[41] is the same skip-thought model with layer normalization trained for 1M iterations. evaluate with 10-fold cross-validation for MR, CR, Subj, MPQA and use the train/test split for TREC.”
MethodIdentity mappings in deep residual networks
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38 · Cited by 10,741 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We follow the same setup as [36] and use a ResNet v2 101 architecture [37] as the image encoder g enc to extract CPC representations (note that this encoder is not pretrained).”
MethodDistributed Representations of Sentences and DocumentsPreprint
Le, Q. V., & Mikolov, T. (2014) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1405.4053 · Cited by 10,307 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[40] is an unsupervised approach to learning sentence-level representations.”
BackgroundHinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These techniques made manually specified features largely redundant and have greatly improved state-of-the-art in several real-world applications [1, 2, 3].”
BackgroundMethodMining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For the classification tasks we used the following datasets: movie review sentiment (MR) [43], customer product reviews (CR) [44], subjectivity/objectivity [45], opinion polarity (MPQA) [46] and question-type classification (TREC) [47].”
MethodAsynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Mnih, V., Badia, A. P., Mirza, M., Graves, A., Lillicrap, T. P., Harley, T., Silver, D., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.01783 · Cited by 7,132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Here, we take the standard batched A2C [52] agent as base model and add CPC as an auxiliary loss.”
MethodShow and tell: A neural image caption generator
Vinyals, O., Toshev, A., Bengio, S., & Erhan, D. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298935 · Cited by 6,318 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…example, when pre-training a model to do image classification, the induced features transfer reasonably well to other image classification domains, but also lack certain information such as color or the ability to count that are irrelevant for classification but relevant for e.g. image captioning [4].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citation“Librispeech: an ASR corpus based on public domain audio books,”
Panayotov, V., Chen, G., Povey, D., & Khudanpur, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178964 · Cited by 6,072 · cited 1× · see citing works
“tions, and in reinforcement learning we measure how the auxiliary CPC loss speeds up learning of the agent. 3.1 Audio For audio, we use a 100-hour subset of the publicly available LibriSpeech dataset [30]. Although the dataset does not provide labels other than the raw text, we obtained force-aligned phone sequences 4…”
MethodInfluentialRao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/4580 · Cited by 5,483 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In neuroscience, predictive coding theories suggest that the brain predicts observations at various levels of abstraction [7, 8].”
BackgroundWaveNet: a generative model for raw audio
Oord, A. V. D., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.03499 · Cited by 4,911 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More recent advancements in autoregressive modeling such as masked convolutional architectures [18, 19] or self-attention networks [20] could help improve results further.”
BackgroundSelf-citationDistance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification
Weinberger, K. Q., & Saul, L. K. (2009) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1577069.1577078 · Cited by 4,651 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, the techniques proposed by [21, 22, 23] were based on triplet losses using a max-margin approach to separate positive from negative examples.”
MethodA theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In neuroscience, predictive coding theories suggest that the brain predicts observations at various levels of abstraction [7, 8].”
BackgroundMethodLearning a Similarity Metric Discriminatively, with Application to Face Verification
Chopra, S., Hadsell, R., & LeCun, Y. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.202 · Cited by 4,036 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, the techniques proposed by [21, 22, 23] were based on triplet losses using a max-margin approach to separate positive from negative examples.”
MethodZhang, R., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2016) · European Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46487-9_40 · Cited by 3,803 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Work shown useful [10, 11].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,317 · cited 1× · see citing works
“nd the word embeddings learned by the model. For the classification tasks we used the following datasets: movie review sentiment (MR) [43], customer product reviews (CR) [44], subjectivity/objectivity [45], opinion polarity (MPQA) [46] and question-type classification (TREC) [47]. As in [26] we train a logistic regressi…”
MethodInfluentialLearning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.1078 · Cited by 3,317 · see citing works
Pixel Recurrent Neural NetworksPreprint
van den Oord, A., Kalchbrenner, N., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1601.06759 · Cited by 3,111 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Next, we use a PixelCNN-style autoregressive model [19] (a convolutional row-GRU PixelRNN [39] gave similar results) to make predictions about the latent activations in following rows top-to-bottom, visualized in Figure 4.”
MethodSelf-citationConditional Image Generation with PixelCNN DecodersPreprint
van den Oord, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Vinyals, O., Espeholt, L., Graves, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05328 · Cited by 3,066 · cited 2× · see citing works
“More recent advancements in autoregressive modeling such as masked convolutional architectures [18, 19] or self-attention networks [20] could help improve results further.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationUnsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzles
Noroozi, M., & Favaro, P. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46466-4_5 · Cited by 2,775 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The ImageNet dataset has been used to evaluate unsupervised vision models by many authors [28, 11, 35, 10, 29, 36].”
BackgroundMethodUnsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Prediction
Doersch, C., Gupta, A., & Efros, A. A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.167 · Cited by 2,629 · cited 4× · see citing works
“8 Relative Position [11] 30.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialZhu, Y., Kiros, R., Zemel, R., Salakhutdinov, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.11 · Cited by 2,264 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We first learn our unsupervised model on the BookCorpus dataset [42], and evaluate the capability of our model as a generic feature extractor by using CPC representations for a set of classification tasks.”
MethodPang, B., & Lee, L. (2005) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1219840.1219855 · Cited by 2,153 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For the classification tasks we used the following datasets: movie review sentiment (MR) [43], customer product reviews (CR) [44], subjectivity/objectivity [45], opinion polarity (MPQA) [46] and question-type classification (TREC) [47].”
MethodAdversarial Feature LearningPreprint
Donahue, J., Krähenbühl, P., & Darrell, T. (2016) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.09782 · Cited by 1,982 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The ImageNet dataset has been used to evaluate unsupervised vision models by many authors [28, 11, 35, 10, 29, 36].”
MethodAnnotating Expressions of Opinions and Emotions in Language
Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., & Cardie, C. (2005) · Computers and the Humanities · doi:10.1007/s10579-005-7880-9 · Cited by 1,763 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For the classification tasks we used the following datasets: movie review sentiment (MR) [43], customer product reviews (CR) [44], subjectivity/objectivity [45], opinion polarity (MPQA) [46] and question-type classification (TREC) [47].”
MethodSlow Feature Analysis: Unsupervised Learning of Invariances
Wiskott, L., & B, T. J. S. A. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602317318938 · Cited by 1,351 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These ’slow features’ [13] that span many time steps are often more interesting (e.g., phonemes and intonation in speech, objects in images, or the story line in books.).”
BackgroundKiros, R., Zhu, Y., Salakhutdinov, R., Zemel, R. S., Torralba, A., Urtasun, R., & Fidler, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.06726 · Cited by 1,293 · cited 6× · see citing works
“As in [26] we train a logistic regression classifier and Table 5: Classification accuracy on five common NLP benchmarks.”
MethodInfluentialLi, X., & Roth, D. (2002) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1072228.1072378 · Cited by 1,270 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For the classification tasks we used the following datasets: movie review sentiment (MR) [43], customer product reviews (CR) [44], subjectivity/objectivity [45], opinion polarity (MPQA) [46] and question-type classification (TREC) [47].”
MethodExploring the Limits of Language ModelingPreprint
Józefowicz, R., Vinyals, O., Schuster, M., Shazeer, N., & Wu, Y.-H. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.02410 · Cited by 1,202 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although we cannot evaluate p ( x ) or p ( x | c ) directly, we can use samples from these distributions, allowing us to use techniques such as Noise-Contrastive Estimation [12, 14, 15] and Importance Sampling [16] that are based on comparing the target value with randomly sampled negative values.”
MethodSelf-citationUnsupervised Learning of Visual Representations Using Videos
Wang, X., & Gupta, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.320 · Cited by 1,005 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In Computer Vision [28] use a triplet loss on tracked video patches so that patches from the same object at different timesteps are more similar to each other than to random patches.”
BackgroundMethodIMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner ArchitecturesPreprint
Espeholt, L., Soyer, H., Munos, R., Simonyan, K., Mnih, V., Ward, T., Doron, Y., Firoiu, V., Harley, T., Dunning, I., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.01561 · Cited by 851 · cited 3× · see citing works
“We refer to [50] for all other hyperparameter and implementation details.”
MethodMulti-task Self-Supervised Visual Learning
Doersch, C., & Zisserman, A. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.226 · Cited by 682 · cited 3× · see citing works
“We follow the same setup as [36] and use a ResNet v2 101 architecture [37] as the image encoder g enc to extract CPC representations (note that this encoder is not pretrained).”
MethodTime-Contrastive Networks: Self-Supervised Learning from Video
Sermanet, P., Lynch, C., Chebotar, Y., Hsu, J., Jang, E., Stefan Schaal, A., Levine, S., & Brain, G. (2018) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8462891 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
MINE: Mutual Information Neural EstimationPreprint
Belghazi, M. I., Baratin, A., Rajeswar, S., Ozair, S., Bengio, Y., Courville, A. C., & Hjelm, R. D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.04062 · Cited by 575 · cited 1× · see citing works
“InfoNCE is also related to MINE [54].”
Learning to Generate Reviews and Discovering Sentiment
Radford, A., Jozefowicz, R., & Sutskever, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.01444 · Cited by 330 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Skip-thought vectors [26] and Byte mLSTM [27] are alternatives which go beyond word prediction with a Recurrent Neural Network, and use maximum likelihood over sequences of observations.”
BackgroundMethodA Fast and Simple Algorithm for Training Neural Probabilistic Language Models
Mnih, A., & Teh, Y. W. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1206.6426 · Cited by 315 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although we cannot evaluate p ( x ) or p ( x | c ) directly, we can use samples from these distributions, allowing us to use techniques such as Noise-Contrastive Estimation [12, 14, 15] and Importance Sampling [16] that are based on comparing the target value with randomly sampled negative values.”
MethodAdaptive Predictive Coding of Speech Signals
Atal, B. S., & Schroeder, M. R. (1970) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1970.tb04297.x · Cited by 256 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This idea of predictive coding [5, 6] is one of the oldest techniques in signal processing for data compression.”
MethodAdaptive Importance Sampling to Accelerate Training of a Neural Probabilistic Language Model
Bengio, Y., & Senécal, J.-S. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2007.912312 · Cited by 223 · cited 1× · see citing works
“though we cannot evaluate p(x) or p(xjc) directly, we can use samples from these distributions, allowing us to use techniques such as Noise-Contrastive Estimation [12, 14, 15] and Importance Sampling [16] that are based on comparing the target value with randomly sampled negative values. In the proposed model, either…”
MethodUnsupervised Learning of Visual Representations using VideosPreprint
Wang, X., & Gupta, A. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1505.00687 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICAPreprint
Hyvärinen, A., & Morioka, H. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.06336 · Cited by 176 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In Time Contrastive Learning [25] a contrastive loss is used to predict the segment-ID of multivariate time-series as a way to extract features and perform nonlinear ICA.”
MethodSelf-Adaptive Hierarchical Sentence ModelPreprint
Zhao, H., Lu, Z., & Poupart, P. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.05070 · Cited by 116 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We note that better [49, 27] results have been published on these target datasets, by transfer learning from a different source task.”
BackgroundTime-Contrastive Networks: Self-Supervised Learning from Multi-view Observation
Sermanet, P., Lynch, C., Hsu, J., & Levine, S. (2017) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2017.69 · Cited by 112 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More recent work includes Time Contrastive Networks [24] which proposes to minimize distances between embeddings from multiple viewpoints of the same scene and whilst maximizing distances between embeddings extracted from different timesteps.”
BackgroundBeattie, C., Leibo, J. Z., Teplyashin, D., Ward, T., Wainwright, M., Küttler, H., Lefrancq, A., Green, S., Valdés, V., Sadik, A., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.03801 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Time-Contrastive Networks: Self-Supervised Learning from VideoPreprint
Sermanet, P., Lynch, C., Chebotar, Y., Hsu, J., Jang, E., Stefan Schaal, A., & Levine, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.06888 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Negro, P. J. (2019) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/9781681087665119010016 · cited 2×
“This idea of predictive coding [5, 6] is one of the oldest techniques in signal processing for data compression.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [12][12] Michael Gutmann and Aapo Hyvärinen. Noise-contrastive estimation: A new estimation principle for unnormalized statistical models. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 297-304, 2010. -
- [31][31] Daniel Povey, Arnab Ghoshal, Gilles Boulianne, Lukas Burget, Ondrej Glembek, Nagendra Goel, Mirko Hannemann, Petr Motlicek, Yanmin Qian, Petr Schwarz, et al. The kaldi speech recognition toolkit. In IEEE 2011 workshop on automatic speech recognition and understanding . IEEE Signal Processing Society, 2011. -
- [33][33] Laurens van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learning research , 9(Nov):2579-2605, 2008. -
- [48][48] Sida Wang and Christopher D. Manning. Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers - Volume 2 , ACL '12, pages 90-94, 2012. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00975 · Cited by 13,347 · see citing works
A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations
Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05709 · Cited by 10,857 · see citing works
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293 · see citing works
Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learning
Chen, X., & He, K. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01549 · Cited by 3,725 · see citing works
Bootstrap Your Own Latent: A New Approach to Self-Supervised Learning
Grill, J.-B., Strub, F., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Richemond, P. H., Buchatskaya, E., Doersch, C., Pires, B. A., Guo, Z. D., Azar, M. G., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07733 · Cited by 3,846 · see citing works
HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Units
Hsu, W.-N., Bolte, B., Tsai, Y.-H. H., Lakhotia, K., Salakhutdinov, R., & Mohamed, A. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2021.3122291 · Cited by 2,983 · see citing works
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676 · see citing works
wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representations
Baevski, A., Zhou, H., Mohamed, A., & Auli, M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11477 · Cited by 2,369 · see citing works
Shortcut learning in deep neural networks
Geirhos, R., Jacobsen, J.-H., Michaelis, C., Zemel, R., Brendel, W., Bethge, M., & Wichmann, F. A. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00257-z · Cited by 2,224 · see citing works
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3703155 · Cited by 2,142 · see citing works
Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive LearningPreprint
Chen, X., Fan, H., Girshick, R., & He, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.04297 · Cited by 2,579 · see citing works
Self-Supervised Visual Feature Learning With Deep Neural Networks: A Survey
Jing, L., & Tian, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.2992393 · Cited by 2,036 · see citing works
Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignments
Caron, M., Misra, I., Mairal, J., Goyal, P., Bojanowski, P., & Joulin, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.09882 · Cited by 2,499 · see citing works
WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processing
Chen, S., Wang, C., Chen, Z., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Chen, Z., Li, J., Kanda, N., Yoshioka, T., Xiao, X., et al. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2022.3188113 · Cited by 1,926 · see citing works
Diffusion Models in Vision: A Survey
Croitoru, F.-A., Hondru, V., Ionescu, R. T., & Shah, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3261988 · Cited by 1,965 · see citing works
ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generators
Clark, K., Luong, M.-T., Le, Q. V., & Manning, C. D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.10555 · Cited by 1,844 · see citing works
An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformers
Chen, X., Xie, S., & He, K. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00950 · Cited by 1,648 · see citing works
Model-Contrastive Federated Learning
Li, Q., He, B., & Song, D. X. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01057 · Cited by 1,634 · see citing works
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Chen, M., Tworek, J., Jun, H., Yuan, Q., Pinto, H. P. D. O., Kaplan, J., Edwards, H., Burda, Y., Joseph, N., Brockman, G., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03374 · Cited by 1,436 · see citing works
“…al., 2018), computer vision (Van Oord et al., 2016; Menick & Kalchbrenner, 2018; Chen et al., 2020; Bao et al., 2021), audio and speech processing (Oord et al., 2016; 2018; Dhari-wal et al., 2020; Baevski et al., 2020), biology (Alley et al., 2019; Rives et al., 2021), and even across multiple…”
BackgroundSelf-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representations
Misra, I., & van der Maaten, L. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00674 · Cited by 1,435 · see citing works
wav2vec: Unsupervised Pre-Training for Speech Recognition
Schneider, S., Baevski, A., Collobert, R., & Auli, M. (2019) · Interspeech 2019 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2019-1873 · Cited by 1,290 · see citing works
Lin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Qiu, X. (2022) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.10.001 · Cited by 1,422 · see citing works
CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning
Hessel, J., Holtzman, A., Forbes, M., Le Bras, R., & Choi, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.595 · Cited by 1,232 · see citing works
Toward Causal Representation Learning
Scholkopf, B., Locatello, F., Bauer, S., Ke, N. R., Kalchbrenner, N., Goyal, A., & Bengio, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3058954 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Recent advances and clinical applications of deep learning in medical image analysis
Chen, X., Wang, X., Zhang, K., Fung, K.-M. A., Thai, T., Moore, K. N., Mannel, R. S., Liu, H., Zheng, B., & Qiu, Y. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102444 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentation
Zhu, Y., Xu, Y., Yu, F., Liu, Q., Wu, S., & Wang, L. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3449802 · Cited by 1,192 · see citing works
Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillation
Li, J., Selvaraju, R. R., Gotmare, A. D., Joty, S., Xiong, C., & Hoi, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07651 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey
Zhang, J., Huang, J., Jin, S., & Lu, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3369699 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
“Given a batch of B images, contrastive-learning objectives ( e.g. , InfoNCE [68] and its variants [12], [13]) are usually formulated as follows: where z Ii is the query embedding, { z Ij } B +1 j =1 ,j ̸ = i are key embeddings, where z I + stands for z Ii ’s positive key and the rest are z Ii ’s…”
BackgroundCutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localization
Li, C.-L., Sohn, K., Yoon, J., & Pfister, T. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00954 · Cited by 1,107 · see citing works
Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation LearningPreprint
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. B. (2019) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.05722 · Cited by 16,250 · see citing works
Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Training
Zhai, X., Mustafa, B., Kolesnikov, A., & Beyer, L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01100 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
Li, B., Li, Y., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01409 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Self-citationContrastive Learning for Compact Single Image Dehazing
Wu, H., Qu, Y., Lin, S., Zhou, J. Y., Qiao, R., Zhang, Z., Xie, Y., & Ma, L. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01041 · Cited by 982 · see citing works
BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformers
Bao, H., Dong, L., Piao, S., & Wei, F. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.08254 · Cited by 1,392 · see citing works
Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Hénaff, O. J., Srinivas, A., De Fauw, J., Razavi, A., Doersch, C., Eslami, S. M. A., & Oord, A. V. D. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.09272 · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular contrastive learning of representations via graph neural networks
Wang, Y., Wang, J., Cao, Z., & Farimani, A. B. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00447-x · Cited by 885 · see citing works
Contrastive Representation Learning: A Framework and Review
Le-Khac, P. H., Healy, G., & Smeaton, A. F. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3031549 · Cited by 862 · see citing works
Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsPreprint
You, Y., Chen, T., Sui, Y., Chen, T., Wang, Z., & Shen, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.13902 · Cited by 1,400 · see citing works
Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysis
Tang, Y., Yang, D., Li, W., Roth, H. R., Landman, B., Xu, D., Nath, V., & Hatamizadeh, A. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.02007 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
ImageBind One Embedding Space to Bind Them All
Girdhar, R., El-Nouby, A., Liu, Z., Singh, M., Alwala, K. V., Joulin, A., & Misra, I. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01457 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
“The embeddings and the encoders are optimized using an InfoNCE [54] loss: LI,M = − log exp(q⊺i ki/τ) exp(q⊺i ki/τ) + ∑ j ̸=i exp(q ⊺ i kj/τ) , (1) where τ is a scalar temperature that controls the smoothness of the softmax distribution and j denotes unrelated observations, also called ‘negatives’.”
MethodInfluentialPoint-BERT: Pre-training 3D Point Cloud Transformers with Masked Point Modeling
Yu, X., Tang, L., Rao, Y., Huang, T., Zhou, J., & Lu, J. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01871 · Cited by 832 · see citing works
Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy ReductionPreprint
Žbontar, J., Jing, L., Misra, I., LeCun, Y., & Deny, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.03230 · Cited by 1,329 · see citing works
MedCLIP: Contrastive Learning from Unpaired Medical Images and Text
Wang, Z., Wu, Z., Agarwal, D., & Sun, J. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.256 · Cited by 838 · see citing works
Reconstruction by inpainting for visual anomaly detection
Zavrtanik, V., Kristan, M., & Skočaj, D. (2020) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107706 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
MDETR - Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understanding
Kamath, A., Singh, M., LeCun, Y., Synnaeve, G., Misra, I., & Carion, N. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00180 · Cited by 761 · see citing works
A visual–language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical twitter
Huang, Z., Bianchi, F., Yuksekgonul, M., Montine, T. J., & Zou, J. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02504-3 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Revisiting Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learning
Kolesnikov, A., Zhai, X., & Beyer, L. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00202 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Reproducible Scaling Laws for Contrastive Language-Image Learning
Cherti, M., Beaumont, R., Wightman, R., Wortsman, M., Ilharco, G., Gordon, C., Schuhmann, C., Schmidt, L., & Jitsev, J. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00276 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
“The InfoNCE loss [52] used by CLIP can be thought of as a method to maximize the mutual information between text and image representations.”
BackgroundMethod(2019) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 350 · see citing works
SUPERB: Speech Processing Universal PERformance Benchmark
Yang, S.-W., Chi, P.-H., Chuang, Y.-S., Lai, C.-I. J., Lakhotia, K., Lin, Y. Y., Liu, A. T., Shi, J., Chang, X., Lin, G.-T., et al. (2021) · Interspeech 2021 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2021-1775 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
A Survey on Deep Learning for Data-Driven Soft Sensors
Sun, Q., & Ge, Z. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3053128 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classification
Azizi, S., Mustafa, B., Ryan, F., Beaver, Z., Freyberg, J., Deaton, J., Loh, A., Karthikesalingam, A., Kornblith, S., Chen, T., et al. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00346 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Chen, R. J., Lu, M. Y., Wang, J., Williamson, D. F. K., Rodig, S. J., Lindeman, N. I., & Mahmood, F. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.3021387 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
What makes for good views for contrastive learning
Tian, Y., Sun, C., Poole, B., Krishnan, D., Schmid, C., & Isola, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.10243 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Time-Series Representation Learning via Temporal and Contextual Contrasting
Eldele, E., Ragab, M., Chen, Z., Wu, M., Kwoh, C. K., Li, X., & Guan, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/324 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Training
Wang, X., Zhang, R., Shen, C., Kong, T., & Li, L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00304 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Loss
Wang, F., & Liu, H. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00252 · Cited by 698 · see citing works
Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Representation Learning for Speech Recognition
Conneau, A., Baevski, A., Collobert, R., Mohamed, A., & Auli, M. (2021) · Interspeech 2021 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2021-329 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Exploring Cross-Image Pixel Contrast for Semantic Segmentation
Wang, W., Zhou, T., Yu, F., Dai, J., Konukoglu, E., & Gool, L. V. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00721 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
End-to-End Learning of Visual Representations From Uncurated Instructional Videos
Miech, A., Alayrac, J.-B., Smaira, L., Laptev, I., Šivic, J., & Zisserman, A. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00990 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
RegionCLIP: Region-based Language-Image Pretraining
Zhong, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, P., Li, C., Codella, N., Li, L. H., Zhou, L., Dai, X., Yuan, L., Li, Y., et al. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01629 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-Supervised Hypergraph Convolutional Networks for Session-based Recommendation
Xia, X., Yin, H., Yu, J., Wang, Q., Cui, L., & Zhang, X. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16578 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Improving Graph Collaborative Filtering with Neighborhood-enriched Contrastive Learning
Lin, Z., Tian, C., Hou, Y., et al. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512104 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation
Yang, L., Qi, L., Feng, L., Zhang, W., & Shi, Y. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00699 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
“So the InfoNCE loss [59] is satisfied: Ls1↔s2 = − log exp(qs1 · qs2) ∑C i=0 exp(qj · ki) , s.”
SCAN: Learning to Classify Images Without Labels
Gansbeke, W. V., Vandenhende, S., Georgoulis, S., Proesmans, M., & Gool, L. V. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58607-2_16 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
XLS-R: Self-supervised Cross-lingual Speech Representation Learning at Scale
Babu, A., Wang, C., Tjandra, A., Lakhotia, K., Xu, Q., Goyal, N., Singh, K., von Platen, P., Saraf, Y., Pino, J., et al. (2022) · Interspeech 2022 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2022-143 · Cited by 586 · see citing works
FSCE: Few-Shot Object Detection via Contrastive Proposal Encoding
Sun, B., Li, B., Cai, S., Yuan, Y., & Zhang, C. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00727 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
Tian, Y., Krishnan, D., & Isola, P. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.05849 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Graph Representation Learning via Graphical Mutual Information Maximization
Peng, Z., Huang, W., Luo, M., Zheng, Q., Rong, Y., Xu, T., & Huang, J. (2020) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3366423.3380112 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
(2022) · doi:10.1145/3485447 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Graph Self-Supervised Learning: A Survey
Liu, Y., Jin, M., Pan, S., Zhou, C. D., Zheng, Y., Xia, F., & Yu, P. S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3172903 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Self-Supervised Multi-Channel Hypergraph Convolutional Network for Social Recommendation
Yu, J., Yin, H., Li, J., Wang, Q., Nguyen, Q. V. H., & Zhang, X. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3449844 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Han, W., Chen, H., & Poria, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.723 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Unreliable Pseudo-Labels
Wang, Y., Wang, H., Shen, Y., Fei, J., Li, W., Jin, G., Wu, L., Zhao, R., & Le, X. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00421 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks via Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning
Liu, Y., Li, Z., Pan, S., Gong, C., Zhou, C. D., & Karypis, G. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3068344 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Quasi-Dense Similarity Learning for Multiple Object Tracking
Pang, J., Qiu, L., Li, X., Chen, H., Li, Q., Darrell, T., & Yu, F. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00023 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Learning Correspondence From the Cycle-Consistency of Time
Wang, X., Jabri, A., & Efros, A. A. (2019) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00267 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representations
Li, J., Zhou, P., Xiong, C., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.04966 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Contrastive Learning for Representation Degeneration Problem in Sequential Recommendation
Qiu, R., Huang, Z. H., Yin, H., & Wang, Z. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3488560.3498433 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Libri-Light: A Benchmark for ASR with Limited or No Supervision
Kahn, J., Rivière, M., Zheng, W., Kharitonov, E., Xu, Q., Mazaré, P.-E., Karadayi, J., Liptchinsky, V., Collobert, R., Fuegen, C., et al. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp40776.2020.9052942 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Putting NeRF on a Diet: Semantically Consistent Few-Shot View Synthesis
Jain, A., Tancik, M., & Abbeel, P. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00583 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised LearnersPreprint
Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Swersky, K., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.10029 · Cited by 1,480 · see citing works
Hu, Z., Dong, Y., Wang, K., Chang, K.-W., & Sun, Y. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403237 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
VideoCLIP: Contrastive Pre-training for Zero-shot Video-Text Understanding
Xu, H., Ghosh, G., Huang, P.-Y., Okhonko, D., Aghajanyan, A., Metze, F., Zettlemoyer, L., & Feichtenhofer, C. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.544 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Sample-Efficient Deep Learning for COVID-19 Diagnosis Based on CT ScansPreprint
He, X., Yang, X., Zhang, S., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Xing, E., & Xie, P. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.04.13.20063941 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on GraphsPreprint
Hassani, K., & Khasahmadi, A. H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.05582 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
InfoGCN: Representation Learning for Human Skeleton-based Action Recognition
Chi, H.-G., Ha, M. H., Chi, S.-G., Lee, S. W., Huang, Q.-X., & Ramani, K. (2022) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01955 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
COMPLETER: Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via Contrastive Prediction
Lin, Y., Gou, Y., Liu, Z., Li, B., Lv, J., & Peng, X. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01102 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Liu, J., Xie, G., Wang, J., Li, S., Wang, C., Zheng, F., & Jin, Y. (2024) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-023-1459-z · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Self-Supervised Representation Learning: Introduction, advances, and challenges
Ericsson, L., Gouk, H., Loy, C. C., & Hospedales, T. M. (2022) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2021.3134634 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
All-In-One Image Restoration for Unknown Corruption
Li, B., Liu, X., Hu, P., Wu, Z., Lv, J., & Peng, X. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01693 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
A Metric Learning Reality Check
Musgrave, K., Belongie, S., & Lim, S.-N. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58595-2_41 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Spatiotemporal Contrastive Video Representation Learning
Qian, R., Meng, T., Gong, B., Yang, M., Wang, H., Belongie, S., & Cui, Y. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00689 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Unsupervised Degradation Representation Learning for Blind Super-Resolution
Wang, L., Wang, Y., Dong, X., Xu, Q., Yang, J., An, W., & Guo, Y. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01044 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Wu, L., He, X., Wang, X., Zhang, K., & Wang, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3145690 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
vq-wav2vec: Self-Supervised Learning of Discrete Speech RepresentationsPreprint
Baevski, A., Schneider, S., & Auli, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.05453 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Local Aggregation for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Embeddings
Zhuang, C., Zhai, A., & Yamins, D. L. K. (2019) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00610 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Audiolm: A language modeling approach to audio generation
Borsos, Z., Marinier, R., Vincent, D., Kharitonov, E., Pietquin, O., Sharifi, M., Roblek, D., Teboul, O., Grangier, D., Tagliasacchi, M., et al. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3288409 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
“Positive pairs can be, for example, two segments that are close temporally [28], [29], [30] or two augmented views of the”
BackgroundMethodSelf-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture
Assran, M., Duval, Q., Misra, I., Bojanowski, P., Vincent, P., Rabbat, M., LeCun, Y., & Ballas, N. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01499 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
HERO: Hierarchical Encoder for Video+Language Omni-representation Pre-training
Li, L., Chen, Y.-C., Cheng, Y., Gan, Z., Yu, L., & Liu, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.161 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
- Authors
- Oord, A. V. D., Li, Y., & Vinyals, O.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1807.03748
- OpenAlex
- W4297808394
- Cited by
- 6,242
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 660 · 2024: 1288 · 2023: 1444 · 2022: 1043 · 2021: 1173 · 2020: 454 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Keywords
- contrastive predictive coding, unsupervised feature learning, autoregressive models, negative sampling, high-dimensional data, speech representation, image representation, text representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
