The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhancing Locally Adaptive Smoothing of Graph Neural Networks Via Laplacian Node Disagreement
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are designed to perform inference on data described by graph-structured node features and topology information. From the perspective of graph signal denoising, the typical message passing schemes of GNNs act as a globally uniform smoothing that minimizes disagreements between embeddings of connected nodes. However, the level of smoothing over different regions of the graph should be different, especially for those inter-class regions. This deviation limits the expressiveness of GNNs, and then renders them fragile to over-smoothing, long-range dependencies, and non-homophily settings. In this paper, we find that the node disagreements of initial graph features can present more trustworthy constraints on node embeddings, thereby enhancing the locally adaptive smoothing of GNNs. To spread the inherent disagreements of nodes, we propose the Laplacian node disagreement to jointly measure the initial features and output embeddings. With such a measurement, we then present a new graph signal denoising objective deriving a more effective message passing scheme and further incorporate it into the GNN architecture, named Laplacian node disagreement-based GNN (LND-GNN). Learning from its output node representations, we integrate an auxiliary disagreement constraint into the overall classification loss. Experiments demonstrate the expressive ability of LND-GNN in the downstream semi-supervised node classification task.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1103/physreve.69.026113 · DOI · Paper page
- Errica, A fair comparison of graph neural networks for graph classification
- 10.1609/aimag.v29i3.2157 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18178/wcse.2019.06.016 · DOI
- Velickovic, Graph attention networks
- Zhang, Link prediction based on graph neural networks, 5171
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3080635 · DOI
- 10.1109/TKDE.2020.3014089 · DOI
- Gilmer, Neural message passing for quantum chemistry, 1263
- Wu, Simplifying graph convolutional networks, 6861
- 10.1145/3459637.3482225 · DOI
- 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11604 · DOI · Paper page
- Dai, Learning steady-states of iterative algorithms over graphs, 1106
- Gu, Implicit graph neural networks, 11 984
- Zhu, Beyond homophily in graph neural networks: Current limitations and effective designs, 7793
- Pei, Geom-GCN: Geometric graph convolutional networks
- Chien, Adaptive universal generalized pagerank graph neural network
- 10.1145/3219819.3220078 · DOI
- Zügner, Adversarial attacks on graph neural networks via meta learning
- Liu, Elastic graph neural networks, 6837
- 10.1145/3394486.3403076 · DOI
- 10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16514 · DOI
- Oono, Graph neural networks exponentially lose expressive power for node classification
- Xu, Representation learning on graphs with jumping knowledge networks, 5453
- Gasteiger, Predict then propagate: Graph neural networks meet personalized pagerank
- Chen, Simple and deep graph convolutional networks, 1725
- Hamilton, Inductive representation learning on large graphs, 1024
- Hou, Measuring and improving the use of graph information in graph neural networks
- 10.1145/3490478 · DOI
- Zhu, Semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions, 912
- Calder, Poisson learning: Graph based semi-supervised learning at very low label rates, 1306
- 10.1145/1201775.882269 · DOI
- Hu, Open graph benchmark: Datasets for machine learning on graphs, 22 118
- Yang, Revisiting semi-supervised learning with graph embeddings, 40
- 10.1145/1557019.1557108 · DOI
- Kingma, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
- 10.24963/ijcai.2019/669 · DOI
- 10.1145/3336191.3371789 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10115-013-0693-z · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, Q., Nichols, C., Welner, R. S., Chen, J. Y., Ku, W.-S., & Yue, Z. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag244
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Hu, L., Cao, X., Chang, Y., & Tsang, I. W.
- Affiliations
- Jilin University (CN)
- Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN)
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1099-1112
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2191
- 2326-3865
- OpenAlex
- W4385656722
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62206108, 61976102, U19A2065)
- Key scientific and technological R&D Plan of Jilin Province of China (20230201066GX)
- Maritime AI Research Programme (SMI-2022-MTP-06)
- AI Singapore OTTC (AISG2-TC-2022-006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Graph Theory and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- graph neural networks, graph signal denoising, message passing, over-smoothing, semi-supervised node classification, graph signal processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review