Cited by 10Advanced Graph Neural NetworksGraph Theory and AlgorithmsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enhancing Locally Adaptive Smoothing of Graph Neural Networks Via Laplacian Node Disagreement

Wang, Yu, Hu, Liang, Cao, Xiaofeng, Chang, Yi, Tsang, Ivor W.·2024·IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are designed to perform inference on data described by graph-structured node features and topology information. From the perspective of graph signal denoising, the typical message passing schemes of GNNs act as a globally uniform smoothing that minimizes disagreements between embeddings of connected nodes. However, the level of smoothing over different regions of the graph should be different, especially for those inter-class regions. This deviation limits the expressiveness of GNNs, and then renders them fragile to over-smoothing, long-range dependencies, and non-homophily settings. In this paper, we find that the node disagreements of initial graph features can present more trustworthy constraints on node embeddings, thereby enhancing the locally adaptive smoothing of GNNs. To spread the inherent disagreements of nodes, we propose the Laplacian node disagreement to jointly measure the initial features and output embeddings. With such a measurement, we then present a new graph signal denoising objective deriving a more effective message passing scheme and further incorporate it into the GNN architecture, named Laplacian node disagreement-based GNN (LND-GNN). Learning from its output node representations, we integrate an auxiliary disagreement constraint into the overall classification loss. Experiments demonstrate the expressive ability of LND-GNN in the downstream semi-supervised node classification task.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tkde.2023.3303212

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1103/physreve.69.026113 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Errica, A fair comparison of graph neural networks for graph classification
  3. 10.1609/aimag.v29i3.2157 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.18178/wcse.2019.06.016 · DOI
  5. Velickovic, Graph attention networks
  6. Zhang, Link prediction based on graph neural networks, 5171
  7. 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3080635 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/TKDE.2020.3014089 · DOI
  9. Gilmer, Neural message passing for quantum chemistry, 1263
  10. Wu, Simplifying graph convolutional networks, 6861
  11. 10.1145/3459637.3482225 · DOI
  12. 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11604 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dai, Learning steady-states of iterative algorithms over graphs, 1106
  14. Gu, Implicit graph neural networks, 11 984
  15. Zhu, Beyond homophily in graph neural networks: Current limitations and effective designs, 7793
  16. Pei, Geom-GCN: Geometric graph convolutional networks
  17. Chien, Adaptive universal generalized pagerank graph neural network
  18. 10.1145/3219819.3220078 · DOI
  19. Zügner, Adversarial attacks on graph neural networks via meta learning
  20. Liu, Elastic graph neural networks, 6837
  21. 10.1145/3394486.3403076 · DOI
  22. 10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16514 · DOI
  23. Oono, Graph neural networks exponentially lose expressive power for node classification
  24. Xu, Representation learning on graphs with jumping knowledge networks, 5453
  25. Gasteiger, Predict then propagate: Graph neural networks meet personalized pagerank
  26. Chen, Simple and deep graph convolutional networks, 1725
  27. Hamilton, Inductive representation learning on large graphs, 1024
  28. Hou, Measuring and improving the use of graph information in graph neural networks
  29. 10.1145/3490478 · DOI
  30. Zhu, Semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions, 912
  31. Calder, Poisson learning: Graph based semi-supervised learning at very low label rates, 1306
  32. 10.1145/1201775.882269 · DOI
  33. Hu, Open graph benchmark: Datasets for machine learning on graphs, 22 118
  34. Yang, Revisiting semi-supervised learning with graph embeddings, 40
  35. 10.1145/1557019.1557108 · DOI
  36. Kingma, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
  37. 10.24963/ijcai.2019/669 · DOI
  38. 10.1145/3336191.3371789 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s10115-013-0693-z · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Hu, L., Cao, X., Chang, Y., & Tsang, I. W.
Affiliations
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Published
2024-03
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
1099-1112
ISSN
  • 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2191
  • 2326-3865
OpenAlex
W4385656722
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62206108, 61976102, U19A2065)
  • Key scientific and technological R&D Plan of Jilin Province of China (20230201066GX)
  • Maritime AI Research Programme (SMI-2022-MTP-06)
  • AI Singapore OTTC (AISG2-TC-2022-006)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Graph Theory and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
graph neural networks, graph signal denoising, message passing, over-smoothing, semi-supervised node classification, graph signal processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review