Revolutionizing Word Clouds for Teaching and Learning With Generative Artificial Intelligence: Cases From China and Singapore
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize teaching and learning applications. This paper examines the word cloud, a toolkit often used to scaffold teaching and learning for reflection, critical thinking, and content learning. Addressing the issues in traditional word clouds, semantic word clouds have been developed but they are technically challenging to develop and still problematic. However, generative AI has the potential to develop efficient, accurate, creative, and accessible word clouds. Three different methods representing three major approaches of word cloud generation were developed, implemented and user evaluated – traditional (baseline), semantic (NLP enhanced), and generative AI (GPT based), in two different language contexts – Chinese (China case) and English (Singapore case). The findings of the study show the technical robustness of the methods as well as providing key pedagogical insights from the user perspective of instructors of higher education courses in China and Singapore. Implications to the design of word clouds and their application in teaching and learning are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Writing support tools like Wordtune, Rytr, and specialized platforms assist students in improving their academic writing.
“Furthermore, writing support tools like Wordtune, Rytr, Wordtune, and specialized platforms such as Rytr assist students in improving their academic writing (Cummings et al., 2024; Koh et al., 2024; Tsao and Nogues, 2024).”
From Pedagogical Applications of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Field (2025) · cites this paper as Koh et al., 2024
Cites
Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
Zheng, L., Chiang, W.-L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., Xing, E. P., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.05685 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882231162868 · Cited by 1,371 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Kohnke et al. [31] provide examples of how ChatGPT can be used in language learning and show the capabilities of the tool in responding to different languages.”
BackgroundDesign Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models
Liu, V., & Chilton, L. B. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501825 · Cited by 639 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The key to using GPT to solve real-world problems and images is by writing good prompts [36].”
BackgroundShould ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models
Ferrara, E. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4614228 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models
Ferrara, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.03738 · Cited by 282
Dalalah, D., & Dalalah, O. M. A. (2023) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100822 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pedagogical Applications of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Field
Qian, Y. (2025) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
“…beyond text-based outputs, tools for image and video generation are emerging, expanding the scope of GenAI applications (Cummings et al., 2024; Koh et al., 2024; Netland et al., 2025; Tsao & Nogues, 2024 Furthermore, writing support tools like Wordtune, Rytr, Wordtune, and specialized…”
- Authors
- Koh, E., Zhang, L., Lee, A. V. Y., & Wang, H.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Central China Normal University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 1390-1401
- ISSN
- 1939-1382 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-0050
- OpenAlex
- W4394002409
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (publishedVersion)
- NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62377017, 62293551)
- Singapore Ministry of Education
- Education Research Funding Programme
- National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (IRB-2019-08-051)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- word clouds, generative AI, university teaching, critical thinking, user evaluation, instructional design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review