Cited by 12Artificial Intelligence in EducationOnline Learning and AnalyticsEducational Technology and Pedagogy

Revolutionizing Word Clouds for Teaching and Learning With Generative Artificial Intelligence: Cases From China and Singapore

Koh, Elizabeth, Zhang, Lishan, Lee, Alwyn Vwen Yen, Wang, Hongye·2024·IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize teaching and learning applications. This paper examines the word cloud, a toolkit often used to scaffold teaching and learning for reflection, critical thinking, and content learning. Addressing the issues in traditional word clouds, semantic word clouds have been developed but they are technically challenging to develop and still problematic. However, generative AI has the potential to develop efficient, accurate, creative, and accessible word clouds. Three different methods representing three major approaches of word cloud generation were developed, implemented and user evaluated – traditional (baseline), semantic (NLP enhanced), and generative AI (GPT based), in two different language contexts – Chinese (China case) and English (Singapore case). The findings of the study show the technical robustness of the methods as well as providing key pedagogical insights from the user perspective of instructors of higher education courses in China and Singapore. Implications to the design of word clouds and their application in teaching and learning are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tlt.2024.3385009

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Writing support tools like Wordtune, Rytr, and specialized platforms assist students in improving their academic writing.

    “Furthermore, writing support tools like Wordtune, Rytr, Wordtune, and specialized platforms such as Rytr assist students in improving their academic writing (Cummings et al., 2024; Koh et al., 2024; Tsao and Nogues, 2024).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koh, E., Zhang, L., Lee, A. V. Y., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Central China Normal University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
Published
2024
Volume
17
Pages
1390-1401
ISSN
  • 1939-1382 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-0050
OpenAlex
W4394002409
Cited by
12
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62377017, 62293551)
  • Singapore Ministry of Education
  • Education Research Funding Programme
  • National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (IRB-2019-08-051)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
word clouds, generative AI, university teaching, critical thinking, user evaluation, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review