Cited by 220Academic integrity and plagiarismAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingArtificial Intelligence in Education

The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT

Dalalah, Doraid, Dalalah, Osama M.A.·2023·The International Journal of Management Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100822

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature is silent on the potential consequences, harmful or beneficial, of ChatGPT usage.

    “The literature is also silent on the potential consequences, harmful or beneficial, of ChatGPT usage (Dalalah & Dalalah, 2023; Paul et al., 2023) despite a ban in many institutions across the globe.”
  • Use of ChatGPT for academic activities is usually considered unethical.

    “Since the use of ChatGPT for academic activities is usually considered as an unethical mean (Dalalah et al., 2023; Dwivedi et al., 2023)”
  • There has been a notable upswing in discussions among scholars and academicians regarding the transformative potential of generative AI, particularly ChatGPT, in higher education and the risks associated with it.

    “there has been a notable upswing in discussions among scholars and academicians regarding the transformative potential of generative AI, particularly ChatGPT, in higher education and the risks associated with it (Dalalah & Dalalah, 2023; Meyer et al., 2023; Peters et al., 2023; Yilmaz & Yilmaz, 2023a).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalalah, D., & Dalalah, O. M. A.
Affiliations
  • Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
  • Jadara University (JO)
Corresponding author
Dalalah, Doraid
Venue
The International Journal of Management Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
100822
ISSN
1472-8117 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378448767
Cited by
218
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 16
FWCI
54.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal of Management Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
generative AI detection, ChatGPT, AI-generated text, false positives, false-negative results, type I and type II errors, academic integrity, AI detection tools, abstracts, research ethics, generative pre-trained transformer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review