The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BUBBLE Rap: Social-Based Forwarding in Delay-Tolerant Networks
Abstract
The increasing penetration of smart devices with networking capability form novel networks. Such networks, also referred as pocket switched networks (PSNs), are intermittently connected and represent a paradigm shift of forwarding data in an ad hoc manner. The social structure and interaction of users of such devices dictate the performance of routing protocols in PSNs. To that end, social information is an essential metric for designing forwarding algorithms for such types of networks. Previous methods relied on building and updating routing tables to cope with dynamic network conditions. On the downside, it has been shown that such approaches end up being cost ineffective due to the partial capture of the transient network behavior. A more promising approach would be to capture the intrinsic characteristics of such networks and utilize them in the design of routing algorithms. In this paper, we exploit two social and structural metrics, namely centrality and community, using real human mobility traces. The contributions of this paper are two-fold. First, we design and evaluate BUBBLE, a novel social-based forwarding algorithm, that utilizes the aforementioned metrics to enhance delivery performance. Second, we empirically show that BUBBLE can substantially improve forwarding performance compared to a number of previously proposed algorithms including the benchmarking history-based PROPHET algorithm, and social-based forwarding SimBet algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finding and evaluating community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.026113 · Cited by 13,931
Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society
Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03607 · Cited by 5,373
Cited by
Multicasting in delay tolerant networks: a social network perspective
Gao, W., Li, Q., Zhao, B., & Cao, G. (2009) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing · doi:10.1145/1530748.1530790 · Cited by 537
Community detection in networks: A multidisciplinary review
Javed, M. A., Younis, M. S., Latif, S., Qadir, J., & Baig, A. (2018) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.02.011 · Cited by 499
MobiClique: middleware for mobile social networking
Pietiläinen, A.-K., Oliver, E., LeBrun, J., Varghese, G., & Diot, C. (2009) · Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on Online social networks · doi:10.1145/1592665.1592678 · Cited by 357
Understanding user behavior in online social networks: a survey
Jin, L., Chen, Y., Wang, T., Hui, P., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6588663 · Cited by 316
Self-citationCellular Traffic Offloading through WiFi Networks
Dimatteo, S., Hui, P., Han, B., & Li, V. O. K. (2011) · 2011 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems · doi:10.1109/mass.2011.26 · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hui, P., Crowcroft, J., & Yoneki, E.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1576-1589
- ISSN
- 1536-1233 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039157284
- Cited by
- 1,515
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 247.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.