The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images
Open accessAbstract
The clinical recognition of abnormal vascular tortuosity, or excessive bending, twisting, and winding, is important to the diagnosis of many diseases. Automated detection and quantitation of abnormal vascular tortuosity from three-dimensional (3-D) medical image data would, therefore, be of value. However, previous research has centered primarily upon two-dimensional (2-D) analysis of the special subset of vessels whose paths are normally close to straight. This report provides the first 3-D tortuosity analysis of clusters of vessels within the normally tortuous intracerebral circulation. We define three different clinical patterns of abnormal tortuosity. We extend into 3-D two tortuosity metrics previously reported as useful in analyzing 2-D images and describe a new metric that incorporates counts of minima of total curvature. We extract vessels from MRA data, map corresponding anatomical regions between sets of normal patients and patients with known pathology, and evaluate the three tortuosity metrics for ability to detect each type of abnormality within the region of interest. We conclude that the new tortuosity metric appears to be the most effective in detecting several types of abnormalities. However, one of the other metrics, based on a sum of curvature magnitudes, may be more effective in recognizing tightly coiled, "corkscrew" vessels associated with malignant tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast mr images
Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L. I., Hayes, C., Hill, D. L. G., Leach, M. O., & Hawkes, D. J. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.796284 · Cited by 5,265
Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: A new paradigm for combination therapy
Jain, R. K. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0901-987 · Cited by 2,184
Cited by
A Framework for Geometric Analysis of Vascular Structures: Application to Cerebral Aneurysms
Piccinelli, M., Veneziani, A., Steinman, D. A., Remuzzi, A., & Antiga, L. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2009.2021652 · Cited by 346
Bullitt, E., Rahman, F. N., Smith, J. K., Kim, E., Zeng, D., Katz, L. M., & Marks, B. L. (2009) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a1695 · Cited by 142
Self-citationThe effect of network thresholding and weighting on structural brain networks in the uk biobank
Buchanan, C. R., Bastin, M. E., Ritchie, S. J., Liewald, D. C., Madole, J. W., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Deary, I. J., & Cox, S. R. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116443 · Cited by 126
Kang, C.-K., Park, C.-A., Park, C.-W., Lee, Y.-B., Cho, Z.-H., & Kim, Y.-B. (2010) · International Journal of Stroke · doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00464.x · Cited by 64
Incorporating prior knowledge in medical image segmentation: a survey
Nosrati, M. S., & Hamarneh, G. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.01092 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Bullitt, E., Gerig, G., Pizer, S. M., Lin, W., & Aylward, S. R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1163-1171
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008150751
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2003.816964
- The paper
- Bullitt, E., Gerig, G., Pizer, S. M., Lin, W., & Aylward, S. R. (2003). Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2003.816964
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.