Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Retinopathy Online Challenge: Automatic Detection of Microaneurysms in Digital Color Fundus Photographs

Open access
Niemeijer, Meindert, van Ginneken, Bram, Cree, Michael J, Mizutani, Atsushi, Quellec, Gwenole, Sanchez, Clara I, Zhang, Bob, Hornero, Roberto, Lamard, Mathieu, Muramatsu, Chisako, Wu, Xiangqian, Cazuguel, Guy, You, Jane, Mayo, AgustIn, Qin Li, Hatanaka, Yuji, Cochener, Beatrice, Roux, Christian, Karray, Fakhri, Garcia, MarIa, Fujita, Hiroshi, Abramoff, Michael D·2010·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

The detection of microaneurysms in digital color fundus photographs is a critical first step in automated screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR), a common complication of diabetes. To accomplish this detection numerous methods have been published in the past but none of these was compared with each other on the same data. In this work we present the results of the first international microaneurysm detection competition, organized in the context of the Retinopathy Online Challenge (ROC), a multiyear online competition for various aspects of DR detection. For this competition, we compare the results of five different methods, produced by five different teams of researchers on the same set of data. The evaluation was performed in a uniform manner using an algorithm presented in this work. The set of data used for the competition consisted of 50 training images with available reference standard and 50 test images where the reference standard was withheld by the organizers (M. Niemeijer, B. van Ginneken, and M. D. Abràmoff). The results obtained on the test data was submitted through a website after which standardized evaluation software was used to determine the performance of each of the methods. A human expert detected microaneurysms in the test set to allow comparison with the performance of the automatic methods. The overall results show that microaneurysm detection is a challenging task for both the automatic methods as well as the human expert. There is room for improvement as the best performing system does not reach the performance of the human expert. The data associated with the ROC microaneurysm detection competition will remain publicly available and the website will continue accepting submissions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2009.2033909

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 516

Metadata

Authors
Niemeijer, M., van Ginneken, B., Cree, M. J., Mizutani, A., Quellec, G., Sanchez, C. I., Zhang, B., Hornero, R., Lamard, M., Muramatsu, C., Wu, X., Cazuguel, G., You, J., Mayo, A., Li, Q., Hatanaka, Y., Cochener, B., Roux, C., Karray, F., Garcia, M., Fujita, H., & Abramoff, M. D.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2010-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
185-195
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W2107871626
Cited by
516
References
1
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retinopathy Online Challenge: Automatic Detection of Microaneurysms in Digital Color Fundus Photographs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2009.2033909
The paper
Niemeijer, M., van Ginneken, B., Cree, M. J., Mizutani, A., Quellec, G., Sanchez, C. I., Zhang, B., Hornero, R., Lamard, M., Muramatsu, C., Wu, X., Cazuguel, G., You, J., Mayo, A., Li, Q., Hatanaka, Y., Cochener, B., Roux, C., Karray, F., . . . Abramoff, M. D. (2010). Retinopathy Online Challenge: Automatic Detection of Microaneurysms in Digital Color Fundus Photographs. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2009.2033909

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.