The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electromagnetic Tracking in Medicine—A Review of Technology, Validation, and Applications
Abstract
Object tracking is a key enabling technology in the context of computer-assisted medical interventions. Allowing the continuous localization of medical instruments and patient anatomy, it is a prerequisite for providing instrument guidance to subsurface anatomical structures. The only widely used technique that enables real-time tracking of small objects without line-of-sight restrictions is electromagnetic (EM) tracking. While EM tracking has been the subject of many research efforts, clinical applications have been slow to emerge. The aim of this review paper is therefore to provide insight into the future potential and limitations of EM tracking for medical use. We describe the basic working principles of EM tracking systems, list the main sources of error, and summarize the published studies on tracking accuracy, precision and robustness along with the corresponding validation protocols proposed. State-of-the-art approaches to error compensation are also reviewed in depth. Finally, an overview of the clinical applications addressed with EM tracking is given. Throughout the paper, we report not only on scientific progress, but also provide a review on commercial systems. Given the continuous debate on the applicability of EM tracking in medicine, this paper provides a timely overview of the state-of-the-art in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Publication bias in clinical research
Easterbrook, P. J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J. A., & Matthews, D. R. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · Cited by 3,109 · cited 1×
“Possibly, problematic applications already fail in a phantom state and/or are not published due to publication bias [28].”
Background
Cited by
Shape Sensing Techniques for Continuum Robots in Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Survey
Shi, C., Luo, X., Qi, P., Li, T., Song, S., Najdovski, Z., Fukuda, T., & Ren, H. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2622361 · Cited by 420
Alambeigi, F., Aghajani Pedram, S., Speyer, J. L., Rosen, J., Iordachita, I., Taylor, R. H., & Armand, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2019.2946726 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Franz, A. M., Haidegger, T., Birkfellner, W., Cleary, K., Peters, T. M., & Maier-Hein, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1702-1725
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2013681472
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electromagnetic Tracking in Medicine—A Review of Technology, Validation, and Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2014.2321777
- The paper
- Franz, A. M., Haidegger, T., Birkfellner, W., Cleary, K., Peters, T. M., & Maier-Hein, L. (2014). Electromagnetic Tracking in Medicine—A Review of Technology, Validation, and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2014.2321777
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.