Cited by 87Image Retrieval and Classification TechniquesRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFace and Expression Recognition

Large Margin Local Estimate With Applications to Medical Image Classification

Open access
Song, Yang, Cai, Weidong, Huang, Heng, Zhou, Yun, Feng, David Dagan, Wang, Yue, Fulham, Michael J., Chen, Mei·2015·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

Medical images usually exhibit large intra-class variation and inter-class ambiguity in the feature space, which could affect classification accuracy. To tackle this issue, we propose a new Large Margin Local Estimate (LMLE) classification model with sub-categorization based sparse representation. We first sub-categorize the reference sets of different classes into multiple clusters, to reduce feature variation within each subcategory compared to the entire reference set. Local estimates are generated for the test image using sparse representation with reference subcategories as the dictionaries. The similarity between the test image and each class is then computed by fusing the distances with the local estimates in a learning-based large margin aggregation construct to alleviate the problem of inter-class ambiguity. The derived similarities are finally used to determine the class label. We demonstrate that our LMLE model is generally applicable to different imaging modalities, and applied it to three tasks: interstitial lung disease (ILD) classification on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images, phenotype binary classification and continuous regression on brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Our experimental results show statistically significant performance improvements over existing popular classifiers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2015.2393954

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, Y., Cai, W., Huang, H., Zhou, Y., Feng, D. D., Wang, Y., Fulham, M. J., & Chen, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • State University of New York (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2015-06
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1362-1377
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W1975815454
Cited by
87
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1356628, 1302675, 1117965, 1344152)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
sparse representation, medical image classification, intra-class variation, interstitial lung disease, high-resolution computed tomography, brain MRI, phenotype classification
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Theoretical, ROC Curve, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Lung Diseases, Interstitial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review