The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patch-Based Output Space Adversarial Learning for Joint Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation
Open accessAbstract
Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness. Accurate segmentation of the optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) from fundus images is beneficial to glaucoma screening and diagnosis. Recently, convolutional neural networks demonstrate promising progress in the joint OD and OC segmentation. However, affected by the domain shift among different datasets, deep networks are severely hindered in generalizing across different scanners and institutions. In this paper, we present a novel patch-based output space adversarial learning framework ( p OSAL) to jointly and robustly segment the OD and OC from different fundus image datasets. We first devise a lightweight and efficient segmentation network as a backbone. Considering the specific morphology of OD and OC, a novel morphology-aware segmentation loss is proposed to guide the network to generate accurate and smooth segmentation. Our p OSAL framework then exploits unsupervised domain adaptation to address the domain shift challenge by encouraging the segmentation in the target domain to be similar to the source ones. Since the whole-segmentation-based adversarial loss is insufficient to drive the network to capture segmentation details, we further design the p OSAL in a patch-based fashion to enable fine-grained discrimination on local segmentation details. We extensively evaluate our p OSAL framework and demonstrate its effectiveness in improving the segmentation performance on three public retinal fundus image datasets, i.e., Drishti-GS, RIM-ONE-r3, and REFUGE. Furthermore, our p OSAL framework achieved the first place in the OD and OC segmentation tasks in the MICCAI 2018 Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602
Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks
Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.632 · Cited by 22,930
Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., & Yuille, A. L. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.00915 · Cited by 22,392
Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation
Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., & Adam, H. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 · Cited by 20,054
V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation
Milletari, F., Navab, N., & Ahmadi, S.-A. (2016) · 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2016.79 · Cited by 11,931
ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design
Ma, N., Zhang, X., Zheng, H.-T., & Sun, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_8 · Cited by 7,356 · cited 1×
“More effort will be involved to extend this framework to other medical image analysis problems in the near future.”
BackgroundRandom Erasing Data Augmentation
Zhong, Z., Zheng, L., Kang, G., Li, S., & Yang, Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i07.7000 · Cited by 3,617
Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representation
Muandet, K., Balduzzi, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.2115 · Cited by 771
Cited by
Domain adaptation for medical image analysis: A survey
Guan, H., & Liu, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2021.3117407 · Cited by 1,057
Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation
Tajbakhsh, N., Jeyaseelan, L., Li, Q., Chiang, J. N., Wu, Z., & Ding, X. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101693 · Cited by 1,095
Orlando, J. I., Fu, H., Barbosa Breda, J., van Keer, K., Bathula, D. R., Diaz-Pinto, A., Fang, R., Heng, P.-A., Kim, J., Lee, J., et al. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.101570 · Cited by 855
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, S., Yu, L., Yang, X., Fu, C.-W., & Heng, P.-A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2485-2495
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2915496375
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 21.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patch-Based Output Space Adversarial Learning for Joint Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2019.2899910
- The paper
- Wang, S., Yu, L., Yang, X., Fu, C.-W., & Heng, P.-A. (2019). Patch-Based Output Space Adversarial Learning for Joint Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2019.2899910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.