The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensing Trending Topics in Twitter
Open accessAbstract
Online social and news media generate rich and timely information about real-world events of all kinds. However, the huge amount of data available, along with the breadth of the user base, requires a substantial effort of information filtering to successfully drill down to relevant topics and events. Trending topic detection is therefore a fundamental building block to monitor and summarize information originating from social sources. There are a wide variety of methods and variables and they greatly affect the quality of results. We compare six topic detection methods on three Twitter datasets related to major events, which differ in their time scale and topic churn rate. We observe how the nature of the event considered, the volume of activity over time, the sampling procedure and the pre-processing of the data all greatly affect the quality of detected topics, which also depends on the type of detection method used. We find that standard natural language processing techniques can perform well for social streams on very focused topics, but novel techniques designed to mine the temporal distribution of concepts are needed to handle more heterogeneous streams containing multiple stories evolving in parallel. One of the novel topic detection methods we propose, based on -grams cooccurrence and topic ranking, consistently achieves the best performance across all these conditions, thus being more reliable than other state-of-the-art techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval
Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1983) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 9,680
Introduction to modern information retrieval
Dillon, M. (1983) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(83)90062-6 · Cited by 5,909
Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors
Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., & Matsuo, Y. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772777 · Cited by 3,640
(2000) · CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · doi:10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993 · Cited by 3,024
Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling
Finkel, J. R., Grenager, T., & Manning, C. (2005) · Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '05 · doi:10.3115/1219840.1219885 · Cited by 3,008
Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2006) · Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06 · doi:10.1145/1143844.1143859 · Cited by 2,386
Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes
Teh, Y. W., Jordan, M. I., Beal, M. J., & Blei, D. M. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000302 · Cited by 2,120
Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle
Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L., & Kleinberg, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1557019.1557077 · Cited by 1,530
Structure and evolution of online social networks
Kumar, R., Novak, J., & Tomkins, A. (2006) · Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1150402.1150476 · Cited by 1,084
Cited by
True or False: Studying the Work Practices of Professional Fact-Checkers
Micallef, N., Armacost, V., Memon, N., & Patil, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3512974 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Aiello, L. M., Petkos, G., Martin, C., Corney, D., Papadopoulos, S., Skraba, R., Goker, A., Kompatsiaris, I., & Jaimes, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1268-1282
- ISSN
- 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0077
- OpenAlex
- W1982029265
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 42.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensing Trending Topics in Twitter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmm.2013.2265080
- The paper
- Aiello, L. M., Petkos, G., Martin, C., Corney, D., Papadopoulos, S., Skraba, R., Goker, A., Kompatsiaris, I., & Jaimes, A. (2013). Sensing Trending Topics in Twitter. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2013.2265080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.