Cited by 27Muscle activation and electromyography studiesEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

On the Decoding of Shoulder Joint Intent of Motion From Transient EMG: Feature Evaluation and Classification

Open access
Tigrini, Andrea, Verdini, Federica, Fioretti, Sandro, Mengarelli, Alessandro·2023·IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics

Abstract

Motion intent detection for shoulder actions may allow the early decoding of upper limb motions, thus enhancing the real-time usability of rehabilitative devices and prosthetics. In this study we faced a motion intent detection problem involving four shoulder movements by using transient epochs of surface electromyographic (EMG) signals. Reliability of time and frequency domain features was investigated through clusters separability properties and classification performances. Those features able to provide accuracy greater than 90% were selected and further investigated by a holdout scheme, i.e. decreasing the amount of data for training the learning models (60%, 50%, 40%, and 30%). Key findings of the study are as follows. Firstly, single-feature approach appeared suitable for early decoding shoulder movements, thus supporting reduced recording setup. Time domain features related to the instantaneous variations of signal amplitude produced the best results but frequency domain features showed comparable performances, suggesting no favored domain for feature extraction. Eventually, autoregressive coefficients suffered from a reduced amount of data used for training. Outcomes of this study can support the design of myoelectric control schemes, based on transient EMG data, for driving shoulder joint assistive devices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmrb.2023.3320260

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. C. Sicuri, G. Porcellini, and G. Merolla, "Robotics in shoulder rehabil- itation," Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 207, 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tigrini, A., Verdini, F., Fioretti, S., & Mengarelli, A.
Affiliations
Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
Published
2023-11
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
1037-1044
ISSN
2576-3202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387129509
Cited by
27
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
surface electromyography, myoelectric control, feature selection, time-domain features, frequency-domain features, autoregressive coefficients, classification accuracy, limited training data, assistive devices, upper limb rehabilitation, prosthetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review