The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Range Correlation and<tex>$ I/ Q$</tex>Performance Benefits in Single-Chip Silicon Doppler Radars for Noncontact Cardiopulmonary Monitoring
Abstract
Direct-conversion microwave Doppler-radar transceivers have been fully integrated in 0.25-/spl mu/m silicon CMOS and BiCMOS technologies. These chips, operating at 1.6 and 2.4 GHz, have detected movement due to heartbeat and respiration 50 cm from the subject, which may be useful in infant and adult apnea monitoring. The range-correlation effect on residual phase noise is a critical factor when detecting small phase fluctuations with a high-phase-noise on-chip oscillator. Phase-noise reduction due to range correlation was experimentally evaluated, and the measured residual phase noise was within 5 dB of predicted values on average. In a direct-conversion receiver, the phase relationship between the received signal and the local oscillator has a significant effect on the demodulation sensitivity, and the null points can be avoided with a quadrature (I/Q) receiver. In this paper, measurements that highlight the performance benefits of an I/Q receiver are presented. While the accuracy of the heart rate measured with the single-channel chip ranges from 40% to 100%, depending on positioning, the quadrature chip accuracy is always better than 80%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smart Homes that Monitor Breathing and Heart Rate
Adib, F., Mao, H., Kabelac, Z., Katabi, D., & Miller, R. C. (2015) · Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702200 · Cited by 916
Emotion recognition using wireless signals
Zhao, M., Adib, F., & Katabi, D. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking · doi:10.1145/2973750.2973762 · Cited by 461
Random Body Movement Cancellation in Doppler Radar Vital Sign Detection
Li, C., & Lin, J. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2008.2007139 · Cited by 448
Self-citationWearable Medical Systems for p-Health
Teng, X.-F., Zhang, Y.-T., Poon, C. C. Y., & Bonato, P. (2008) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2008.2008248 · Cited by 310
DoppleSleep: a contactless unobtrusive sleep sensing system using short-range Doppler radar
Rahman, T., Adams, A. T., Ravichandran, R. V., Zhang, M., Patel, S. N., Kientz, J. A., & Choudhury, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1145/2750858.2804280 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Droitcour, A. D., Boric-Lubecke, O., Lubecke, V. M., Lin, J., & Kovacs, G. T. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 838-848
- ISSN
- 0018-9480 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099743383
- Cited by
- 662
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Range Correlation and<tex>$ I/ Q$</tex>Performance Benefits in Single-Chip Silicon Doppler Radars for Noncontact Cardiopulmonary Monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmtt.2004.823552
- The paper
- Droitcour, A. D., Boric-Lubecke, O., Lubecke, V. M., Lin, J., & Kovacs, G. T. A. (2004). Range Correlation and<tex>$ I/ Q$</tex>Performance Benefits in Single-Chip Silicon Doppler Radars for Noncontact Cardiopulmonary Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmtt.2004.823552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.