Cited by 162Wireless Communication Networks ResearchAdaptive Dynamic Programming ControlAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization

A Self-Learning Call Admission Control Scheme for CDMA Cellular Networks

Liu, D., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks

Abstract

In the present paper, a call admission control scheme that can learn from the network environment and user behavior is developed for code division multiple access (CDMA) cellular networks that handle both voice and data services. The idea is built upon a novel learning control architecture with only a single module instead of two or three modules in adaptive critic designs (ACDs). The use of adaptive critic approach for call admission control in wireless cellular networks is new. The call admission controller can perform learning in real-time as well as in offline environments and the controller improves its performance as it gains more experience. Another important contribution in the present work is the choice of utility function for the present self-learning control approach which makes the present learning process much more efficient than existing learning control methods. The performance of our algorithm will be shown through computer simulation and compared with existing algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnn.2005.853408

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Admission control has leveraged ML extensively in a variety of networks, including ATM networks, wireless networks, cellular networks, ad hoc networks, and next generation networks.

    “As shown in Table 14, Admission control has leveraged ML extensively in a variety of networks, including ATM networks [95,189,190], wireless networks [8,36,359], cellular networks [66,67,281,372,458], ad hoc networks [452], and next generation networks [311].”
  • Liu et al. demonstrate that their admission control mechanism outperforms non-adaptive admission control mechanisms with respect to GoS in CDMA cellular networks.

    “Through simulation of cellular networks with two classes of services, the authors demonstrate that their admission control mechanism outperforms non-adaptive admission control mechanisms, with respect to GoS, in CDMA cellular networks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, D., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Northeastern University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
Published
2005-09
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
1219-1228
ISSN
1045-9227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044922360
Cited by
162
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Communication Networks Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
Keywords
call admission control, CDMA networks, adaptive dynamic programming, self-learning control, utility functions, voice and data services, cellular networks, real-time learning
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Statistical, Information Storage and Retrieval, Internet, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review